Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2 testing with a Gigabyte H77M-D3H and AMD Radeon HD 6800 1024MB on archlinux rolling via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1210149-SU-HYPERTHRE70
hyperthread-test
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2 testing with a Gigabyte H77M-D3H and AMD Radeon HD 6800 1024MB on archlinux rolling via the Phoronix Test Suite.
With hyperthreading:
Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2 @ 3.70GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte H77M-D3H, Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v2/Ivy, Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 64GB M4-CT064M4SSD2 + 500GB Western Digital WD5000BPVT-0 + 1500GB Seagate ST31500541AS, Graphics: AMD Radeon HD 6800 1024MB (775/1000MHz), Audio: Intel 7 /C210, Monitor: Acer G215HV, Network: Atheros AR8151 v2.0 Gigabit
OS: archlinux rolling, Kernel: 3.6.1-cmr (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.12.4, Display Driver: radeon 6.14.6, OpenGL: 2.1 Mesa 8.0.4 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.7.2 + Clang 3.1 + LLVM 3.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
Without hyperthreading:
Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2 @ 3.70GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte H77M-D3H, Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v2/Ivy, Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 64GB M4-CT064M4SSD2 + 500GB Western Digital WD5000BPVT-0 + 1500GB Seagate ST31500541AS, Graphics: AMD Radeon HD 6800 1024MB (775/1000MHz), Audio: Intel 7 /C210, Monitor: Acer G215HV, Network: Atheros AR8151 v2.0 Gigabit
OS: archlinux rolling, Kernel: 3.6.1-cmr (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.13.0, Display Driver: radeon 6.14.6, OpenGL: 3.0 Mesa 9.0 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.7.2 + Clang 3.1 + LLVM 3.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
7-Zip Compression 9.20.1
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
With hyperthreading .... 21669 |===============================================
Without hyperthreading . 14719 |================================
AIO-Stress 0.21
Test: Random Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Without hyperthreading . 32.31 |===============================================
Apache Benchmark 2.4.3
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Without hyperthreading . 43364.92 |============================================
C-Ray 1.1
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
With hyperthreading .... 35.68 |=============================================
Without hyperthreading . 36.97 |===============================================
Crafty 23.4
Elapsed Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
With hyperthreading .... 74.69 |===============================================
Without hyperthreading . 74.70 |===============================================
FFmpeg 1.0
H.264 HD To NTSC DV
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Without hyperthreading . 15.29 |===============================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
Without hyperthreading . 11.73 |===============================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads
Files/s > Higher Is Better
Without hyperthreading . 23.20 |===============================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
Without hyperthreading . 9.97 |================================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync
Files/s > Higher Is Better
Without hyperthreading . 222.33 |==============================================
GnuPG 1.4.10
1GB File Encryption
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Without hyperthreading . 7.85 |================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.16
Operation: Resizing
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
With hyperthreading .... 157 |=================================================
Without hyperthreading . 131 |=========================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.16
Operation: Local Adaptive Thresholding
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
With hyperthreading .... 120 |=================================================
Without hyperthreading . 105 |===========================================
Himeno Benchmark 3.0
Poisson Pressure Solver
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
Without hyperthreading . 1584.60 |============================================
With hyperthreading .... 1603.33 |=============================================
Without hyperthreading . 1557.88 |============================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Without hyperthreading . 1678.70 |=============================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Without hyperthreading . 867.14 |==============================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Without hyperthreading . 1184.24 |=============================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Without hyperthreading . 1625.83 |=============================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Without hyperthreading . 3163.70 |=============================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Without hyperthreading . 1552.59 |=============================================
John The Ripper 1.7.9-jumbo-7
Test: Blowfish
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
With hyperthreading .... 5702 |================================================
Without hyperthreading . 3816 |================================
Minion 0.12
Benchmark: Solitaire
Seconds < Lower Is Better
With hyperthreading .... 114.84 |==============================================
Without hyperthreading . 114.53 |==============================================
Minion 0.12
Benchmark: Quasigroup
Seconds < Lower Is Better
With hyperthreading .... 154.78 |==============================================
Without hyperthreading . 154.89 |==============================================
N-Queens 1.0
Elapsed Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Without hyperthreading . 223.19 |==============================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: EP.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
With hyperthreading .... 266.86 |==============================================
Without hyperthreading . 206.26 |====================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: LU.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
With hyperthreading .... 9748.65 |=============================================
Without hyperthreading . 9395.46 |===========================================
Ogg Encoding 1.3.0
WAV To Ogg
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Without hyperthreading . 8.00 |================================================
OpenSSL 1.0.1c
RSA 4096-bit Performance
Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better
With hyperthreading .... 123.13 |==============================================
Without hyperthreading . 123.57 |==============================================
Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.6
256MB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
With hyperthreading .... 8.42 |=========================================
Without hyperthreading . 9.87 |================================================
Smallpt 1.0
Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples
Seconds < Lower Is Better
With hyperthreading .... 104 |===================================
Without hyperthreading . 146 |=================================================
Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2
Pfam Database Search
Seconds < Lower Is Better
With hyperthreading .... 10.87 |=======================================
Without hyperthreading . 13.13 |===============================================
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 3.1
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Without hyperthreading . 108.73 |==============================================
Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.864
Multiple Sequence Alignment
Seconds < Lower Is Better
With hyperthreading .... 5.75 |========================================
Without hyperthreading . 6.96 |================================================
Timed PHP Compilation 5.2.9
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Without hyperthreading . 33.95 |===============================================
With hyperthreading .... 28.41 |=======================================
Without hyperthreading . 33.92 |===============================================
x264 2012-10-03
H.264 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
With hyperthreading .... 152.15 |==============================================
Without hyperthreading . 118.80 |====================================