hyperthread-test

Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2 testing with a Gigabyte H77M-D3H and AMD Radeon HD 6800 1024MB on archlinux rolling via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1210149-SU-HYPERTHRE70
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Bioinformatics 3 Tests
Chess Test Suite 2 Tests
Timed Code Compilation 2 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 11 Tests
Compression Tests 2 Tests
CPU Massive 17 Tests
Creator Workloads 6 Tests
Cryptography 3 Tests
Encoding 3 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 4 Tests
Common Kernel Benchmarks 2 Tests
Multi-Core 12 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 2 Tests
Renderers 2 Tests
Scientific Computing 3 Tests
Server 2 Tests
Server CPU Tests 9 Tests
Single-Threaded 4 Tests
Video Encoding 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Core/Thread Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
With hyperthreading
October 14 2012
 
Without hyperthreading
October 14 2012
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

hyperthread-test Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2 testing with a Gigabyte H77M-D3H and AMD Radeon HD 6800 1024MB on archlinux rolling via the Phoronix Test Suite. With hyperthreading: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2 @ 3.70GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte H77M-D3H, Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v2/Ivy, Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 64GB M4-CT064M4SSD2 + 500GB Western Digital WD5000BPVT-0 + 1500GB Seagate ST31500541AS, Graphics: AMD Radeon HD 6800 1024MB (775/1000MHz), Audio: Intel 7 /C210, Monitor: Acer G215HV, Network: Atheros AR8151 v2.0 Gigabit OS: archlinux rolling, Kernel: 3.6.1-cmr (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.12.4, Display Driver: radeon 6.14.6, OpenGL: 2.1 Mesa 8.0.4 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.7.2 + Clang 3.1 + LLVM 3.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Without hyperthreading: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2 @ 3.70GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte H77M-D3H, Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v2/Ivy, Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 64GB M4-CT064M4SSD2 + 500GB Western Digital WD5000BPVT-0 + 1500GB Seagate ST31500541AS, Graphics: AMD Radeon HD 6800 1024MB (775/1000MHz), Audio: Intel 7 /C210, Monitor: Acer G215HV, Network: Atheros AR8151 v2.0 Gigabit OS: archlinux rolling, Kernel: 3.6.1-cmr (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.13.0, Display Driver: radeon 6.14.6, OpenGL: 3.0 Mesa 9.0 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.7.2 + Clang 3.1 + LLVM 3.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 N-Queens 1.0 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Without hyperthreading . 223.19 |============================================== GnuPG 1.4.10 1GB File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better Without hyperthreading . 7.85 |================================================ FFmpeg 1.0 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better Without hyperthreading . 15.29 |=============================================== Ogg Encoding 1.3.0 WAV To Ogg Seconds < Lower Is Better Without hyperthreading . 8.00 |================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Without hyperthreading . 1552.59 |============================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Without hyperthreading . 3163.70 |============================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Without hyperthreading . 1625.83 |============================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Without hyperthreading . 1184.24 |============================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Without hyperthreading . 867.14 |============================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Without hyperthreading . 1678.70 |============================================= FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync Files/s > Higher Is Better Without hyperthreading . 222.33 |============================================== FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better Without hyperthreading . 9.97 |================================================ FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads Files/s > Higher Is Better Without hyperthreading . 23.20 |=============================================== FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better Without hyperthreading . 11.73 |=============================================== AIO-Stress 0.21 Test: Random Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Without hyperthreading . 32.31 |=============================================== Apache Benchmark 2.4.3 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Without hyperthreading . 43364.92 |============================================ Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 3.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Without hyperthreading . 108.73 |============================================== OpenSSL 1.0.1c RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better With hyperthreading .... 123.13 |============================================== Without hyperthreading . 123.57 |============================================== Minion 0.12 Benchmark: Quasigroup Seconds < Lower Is Better With hyperthreading .... 154.78 |============================================== Without hyperthreading . 154.89 |============================================== Minion 0.12 Benchmark: Solitaire Seconds < Lower Is Better With hyperthreading .... 114.84 |============================================== Without hyperthreading . 114.53 |============================================== Crafty 23.4 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better With hyperthreading .... 74.69 |=============================================== Without hyperthreading . 74.70 |=============================================== Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better With hyperthreading .... 104 |=================================== Without hyperthreading . 146 |================================================= Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.6 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better With hyperthreading .... 8.42 |========================================= Without hyperthreading . 9.87 |================================================ C-Ray 1.1 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better With hyperthreading .... 35.68 |============================================= Without hyperthreading . 36.97 |=============================================== Timed PHP Compilation 5.2.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Without hyperthreading . 33.95 |=============================================== With hyperthreading .... 28.41 |======================================= Without hyperthreading . 33.92 |=============================================== 7-Zip Compression 9.20.1 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better With hyperthreading .... 21669 |=============================================== Without hyperthreading . 14719 |================================ Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better Without hyperthreading . 1584.60 |============================================ With hyperthreading .... 1603.33 |============================================= Without hyperthreading . 1557.88 |============================================ GraphicsMagick 1.3.16 Operation: Local Adaptive Thresholding Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better With hyperthreading .... 120 |================================================= Without hyperthreading . 105 |=========================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.16 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better With hyperthreading .... 157 |================================================= Without hyperthreading . 131 |========================================= x264 2012-10-03 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better With hyperthreading .... 152.15 |============================================== Without hyperthreading . 118.80 |==================================== John The Ripper 1.7.9-jumbo-7 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better With hyperthreading .... 5702 |================================================ Without hyperthreading . 3816 |================================ Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.864 Multiple Sequence Alignment Seconds < Lower Is Better With hyperthreading .... 5.75 |======================================== Without hyperthreading . 6.96 |================================================ Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better With hyperthreading .... 10.87 |======================================= Without hyperthreading . 13.13 |=============================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: LU.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better With hyperthreading .... 9748.65 |============================================= Without hyperthreading . 9395.46 |=========================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: EP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better With hyperthreading .... 266.86 |============================================== Without hyperthreading . 206.26 |====================================