Intel Sandy Bridge Mobile GT2 Thread Count Quick tests of Mesa from this weekend by Michael Larabel for Phoronix.com testing with regard to the Counter-Strike: Source performance boost from correcting the max WM thread count for Intel Gen6 Sandy Bridge GT2.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1207291-SU-INTELSAND75&sor&grs .
Intel Sandy Bridge Mobile GT2 Thread Count Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server Display Driver OpenGL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution 40 WM Threads 80 WM Threads Intel Core i5-2520M @ 2.50GHz (4 Cores) HP 161C Intel 2nd Generation Core Family DRAM 4096MB 160GB INTEL SSDSA2M160 Intel 2nd Generation Core Family IGP IDT 92HD81B1X5 Intel 82579LM Gigabit Connection + Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205 Ubuntu 12.10 3.5.0-6-generic (x86_64) Unity 2D 6.0.0 X Server 1.12.1.902 (1.12.2 RC 2) intel 2.20.2 2.1 Mesa 8.1-devel (git-fdd8df2) GCC 4.7 + LLVM 3.0 ext4 1600x900 2.1 Mesa 8.1-devel (git-dcf8754) OpenBenchmarking.org Graphics Details - SNA
Intel Sandy Bridge Mobile GT2 Thread Count xonotic: 1600 x 900 - High xonotic: 1600 x 900 - Low xonotic: 1440 x 900 - High xonotic: 1440 x 900 - Low openarena: 1440 x 900 openarena: 1600 x 900 lightsmark: 1440 x 900 doom3: 1600 x 900 - Low lightsmark: 1600 x 900 prey: 1600 x 900 40 WM Threads 80 WM Threads 41.19 76.86 44.65 81.94 25.70 96.37 54.46 30.03 50.46 22.30 42.69 74.30 46.00 80.11 25.90 96.10 54.31 29.97 50.40 22.30 OpenBenchmarking.org
Xonotic Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.6 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Effects Quality: High 80 WM Threads 40 WM Threads 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 42.69 41.19
Xonotic Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Effects Quality: Low OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.6 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Effects Quality: Low 40 WM Threads 80 WM Threads 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 1.10, N = 3 76.86 74.30
Xonotic Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.6 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Effects Quality: High 80 WM Threads 40 WM Threads 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 46.00 44.65
Xonotic Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Effects Quality: Low OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.6 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Effects Quality: Low 40 WM Threads 80 WM Threads 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 81.94 80.11
OpenArena Resolution: 1440 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 1440 x 900 80 WM Threads 40 WM Threads 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 25.90 25.70
OpenArena Resolution: 1600 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better OpenArena 0.8.5 Resolution: 1600 x 900 40 WM Threads 80 WM Threads 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 96.37 96.10
Lightsmark Resolution: 1440 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Lightsmark 2008 Resolution: 1440 x 900 40 WM Threads 80 WM Threads 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 54.46 54.31
Doom 3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Quality: Low OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Doom 3 1.3.1 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Quality: Low 40 WM Threads 80 WM Threads 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 30.03 29.97
Lightsmark Resolution: 1600 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Lightsmark 2008 Resolution: 1600 x 900 40 WM Threads 80 WM Threads 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 50.46 50.40
Prey Resolution: 1600 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Prey 1.4.119 Resolution: 1600 x 900 80 WM Threads 40 WM Threads 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 22.30 22.30
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4