medion_amd+geforce

AMD Athlon XP 2000+ testing with a MSI MS-6738 and NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 on Ubuntu 12.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1206203-AR-MEDIONAMD89
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
amb+geforce
May 21 2012
 
nvdia
June 15 2012
 
nvidia5600
June 15 2012
 
fx5600
June 16 2012
 
geforce3-ti200
June 18 2012
 
geforce33-ti200
June 18 2012
 
ti200-overclock
June 19 2012
 
geforce4
June 20 2012
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

medion_amd+geforce AMD Athlon XP 2000+ testing with a MSI MS-6738 and NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 on Ubuntu 12.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. amb+geforce: Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 495MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 (249/333MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-24-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 nvdia: Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 748MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 128MB (324/551MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-24-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, OpenGL: 1.5 Mesa 8.0.2 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 nvidia5600: Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 748MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 128MB (324/551MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-24-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, OpenGL: 1.5 Mesa 8.0.2 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 fx5600: Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 748MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 128MB (324/551MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-25-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, OpenGL: 1.5 Mesa 8.0.2 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 geforce3-ti200: Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 748MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 200 (174/400MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-25-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, OpenGL: 1.2 Mesa 8.0.2, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 geforce33-ti200: Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 748MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 200 (174/400MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-25-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, OpenGL: 1.2 Mesa 8.0.2, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 ti200-overclock: Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 748MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 200 (248/400MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-25-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, OpenGL: 1.2 Mesa 8.0.2, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 geforce4: Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 748MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 (251/351MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-25-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, OpenGL: 1.2 Mesa 8.0.2, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 GtkPerf 0.40 GtkComboBox Seconds < Lower Is Better amb+geforce . 172.15 |================================================== nvdia ....... 194.34 |========================================================= GtkPerf 0.40 GtkDrawingArea - Pixbufs Seconds < Lower Is Better amb+geforce . 45.84 |========================================================== nvdia ....... 23.53 |============================== GtkPerf 0.40 GtkRadioButton Seconds < Lower Is Better amb+geforce . 108.75 |========================================================= nvdia ....... 91.47 |================================================ GtkPerf 0.40 GTK Widget: GtkComboBox Seconds < Lower Is Better ti200-overclock . 182.97 |===================================================== GtkPerf 0.40 GTK Widget: GtkComboBoxEntry Seconds < Lower Is Better ti200-overclock . 126.01 |===================================================== GtkPerf 0.40 GTK Widget: GtkToggleButton Seconds < Lower Is Better ti200-overclock . 71.93 |====================================================== GtkPerf 0.40 GTK Widget: GtkCheckButton Seconds < Lower Is Better ti200-overclock . 42.00 |====================================================== GtkPerf 0.40 GTK Widget: GtkRadioButton Seconds < Lower Is Better ti200-overclock . 87.74 |====================================================== GtkPerf 0.40 GTK Widget: GtkTextView - Scroll Seconds < Lower Is Better ti200-overclock . 0.65 |======================================================= GtkPerf 0.40 GTK Widget: GtkDrawingArea - Circles Seconds < Lower Is Better ti200-overclock . 146.87 |===================================================== GtkPerf 0.40 GTK Widget: GtkDrawingArea - Pixbufs Seconds < Lower Is Better ti200-overclock . 46.03 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 19519.81 |=========================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 22641.75 |================================================== ti200-overclock . 23277.12 |=================================================== geforce4 ........ 22776.63 |================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 8776.89 |======================================= geforce3-ti200 .. 8826.20 |======================================= ti200-overclock . 11556.92 |=================================================== geforce4 ........ 5448.03 |======================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 28320.00 |=================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 26875.16 |================================================ ti200-overclock . 28166.87 |=================================================== geforce4 ........ 21376.71 |====================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 4669.31 |========================================= geforce3-ti200 .. 5335.89 |=============================================== ti200-overclock . 5936.43 |==================================================== geforce4 ........ 3679.84 |================================ JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 61653.10 |============================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 67644.31 |=================================================== ti200-overclock . 67884.92 |=================================================== geforce4 ........ 63521.88 |================================================ JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 43297.40 |=================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 18088.21 |===================== ti200-overclock . 23406.37 |============================ geforce4 ........ 14836.22 |================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 141374.56 |================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 98967.22 |=================================== ti200-overclock . 130460.40 |============================================== geforce4 ........ 80475.43 |============================ JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 14951.51 |=================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 9350.10 |================================ ti200-overclock . 11963.13 |========================================= geforce4 ........ 7824.71 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 240.41 |============================================ geforce3-ti200 .. 263.36 |================================================ ti200-overclock . 287.92 |===================================================== geforce4 ........ 274.95 |=================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 17.56 |================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 16.90 |================================================ ti200-overclock . 18.86 |====================================================== geforce4 ........ 18.81 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 204.10 |=============================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 196.98 |============================================= ti200-overclock . 223.16 |=================================================== geforce4 ........ 231.10 |===================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 14.61 |===================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 13.24 |================================================ ti200-overclock . 15.00 |====================================================== geforce4 ........ 14.93 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 536.58 |================================================= geforce3-ti200 .. 494.64 |============================================= ti200-overclock . 559.07 |=================================================== geforce4 ........ 577.12 |===================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 67.69 |====================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 56.76 |============================================= ti200-overclock . 62.96 |================================================== geforce4 ........ 62.15 |================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 1082.99 |=============================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 1089.06 |=============================================== ti200-overclock . 1208.75 |==================================================== geforce4 ........ 1192.27 |=================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 85.88 |====================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 70.16 |============================================ ti200-overclock . 79.99 |================================================== geforce4 ........ 74.13 |=============================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 6509.34 |================================================ geforce3-ti200 .. 6508.64 |================================================ ti200-overclock . 6998.44 |==================================================== geforce4 ........ 5857.17 |============================================ JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 631.51 |==================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 593.64 |================================================= ti200-overclock . 641.38 |===================================================== geforce4 ........ 629.07 |==================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 23286.31 |=================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 22572.60 |================================================= ti200-overclock . 21966.52 |================================================ geforce4 ........ 12185.12 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 10685.68 |=================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 9132.99 |============================================ ti200-overclock . 8878.20 |========================================== geforce4 ........ 6148.75 |============================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 10428.40 |======================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 13139.12 |=================================================== ti200-overclock . 12839.91 |================================================== geforce4 ........ 10977.22 |=========================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 5624.31 |================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 5825.48 |==================================================== ti200-overclock . 5410.25 |================================================ geforce4 ........ 5329.15 |================================================ OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 800 x 600 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better fx5600 . 25 |================================================================== QGears2 XRender + Gears Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better amb+geforce . 32.87 |========================================================== nvdia ....... 29.31 |==================================================== QGears2 XRender + Text Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better amb+geforce . 31.89 |========================================================== nvdia ....... 30.80 |======================================================== QGears2 XRender + Image Scaling Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better amb+geforce . 60.97 |======================================================= nvdia ....... 63.86 |========================================================== QGears2 OpenGL + Image Scaling Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better amb+geforce . 94.81 |===================== nvdia ....... 254.01 |========================================================= QGears2 OpenGL + Gears Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better nvdia . 79.75 |================================================================ x11perf 1.5 Test: 500px PutImage Square Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 11.50 |=============== fx5600 .......... 30.40 |======================================= geforce33-ti200 . 40.20 |==================================================== ti200-overclock . 41.70 |====================================================== x11perf 1.5 Test: Scrolling 500 x 500 px Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 2198 |========================================== fx5600 .......... 2850 |======================================================= geforce33-ti200 . 1167 |======================= ti200-overclock . 1530 |============================== x11perf 1.5 Test: Fill 300 x 300px AA Trapezoid Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 1093 |============================================== fx5600 .......... 1307 |======================================================= geforce33-ti200 . 487 |==================== ti200-overclock . 486 |==================== x11perf 1.5 Test: 500px Copy From Window To Window Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 6863 |======================================================= fx5600 .......... 3047 |======================== geforce33-ti200 . 1150 |========= ti200-overclock . 1473 |============ x11perf 1.5 Test: 500px Compositing From Pixmap To Window Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 22470 |====================================================== fx5600 .......... 3070 |======= geforce33-ti200 . 1153 |=== ti200-overclock . 1540 |==== x11perf 1.5 Test: 500px Compositing From Window To Window Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 2663 |================================================ fx5600 .......... 3043 |======================================================= geforce33-ti200 . 1160 |===================== ti200-overclock . 1520 |=========================== x11perf 1.5 Test: Copy 500x500 From Pixmap To Pixmap Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 2673 |================================================ fx5600 .......... 3067 |======================================================= geforce33-ti200 . 1157 |===================== ti200-overclock . 1490 |=========================== x11perf 1.5 Test: PutImage XY 500x500 Square Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 0.30 |======================================================= fx5600 .......... 0.10 |================== geforce33-ti200 . 0.10 |================== ti200-overclock . 0.10 |================== x11perf 1.5 Test: Char in 80-char aa line Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 144167 |=============== fx5600 .......... 500667 |===================================================== geforce33-ti200 . 425667 |============================================= ti200-overclock . 445000 |===============================================