test007

Intel Core i7-2720QM testing with a LENOVO 4270CTO and NVIDIA Quadro 1000M 2048MB on Gentoo 2.1 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1206199-BY-TEST0079753
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
2012-06-19 22:31
June 19 2012
 
performance
June 19 2012
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


test007OpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Core i7-2720QM @ 2.20GHz (8 Cores)LENOVO 4270CTO32768MB120GB OCZ VERTEX3 + 500GB Seagate ST95005620AS + 80GB INTEL SSDMAEMC08NVIDIA Quadro 1000M 2048MB (700/900MHz)Gentoo 2.13.2.12-gentoo (x86_64)KDE 4.8.3X Server 1.11.4NVIDIA 295.494.2.0 NVIDIA 295.49GCC 4.6.3 + LLVM 2.9 + CUDA 4.1ext41920x1080ProcessorMotherboardMemoryDiskGraphicsOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionTest007 BenchmarksSystem Logs- --bindir=/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.6.3 --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --datadir=/usr/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.3 --disable-altivec --disable-fixed-point --disable-libgcj --disable-libssp --disable-werror --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-libgomp --enable-libmudflap --enable-lto --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-obsolete --enable-secureplt --enable-shared --enable-targets=all --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --includedir=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.3/include --mandir=/usr/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.3/man --with-python-dir=/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.3/python --without-cloog --without-ppl

2012-06-19 22:31 vs. performance ComparisonPhoronix Test SuiteBaseline+5.2%+5.2%+10.4%+10.4%+15.6%+15.6%20.6%14.6%11.9%11.1%10.9%9.7%J.S.O.RF.F.TCompositeMonte CarloD.L.M.FS.M.MSciMarkSciMarkSciMarkSciMarkSciMarkSciMark2012-06-19 22:31performance

test007scimark2: Compositescimark2: Fast Fourier Transformscimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxationscimark2: Monte Carloscimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiplyscimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorization2012-06-19 22:31performance867.14167.45796.96402.311343.601605.26969.96191.86961.12446.971473.511779.79OpenBenchmarking.org

SciMark

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Composite2012-06-19 22:31performance2004006008001000SE +/- 86.94, N = 8SE +/- 3.39, N = 4867.14969.96
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Composite2012-06-19 22:31performance2004006008001000Min: 270.83 / Avg: 867.14 / Max: 983.96Min: 963.42 / Avg: 969.96 / Max: 979.07

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform2012-06-19 22:31performance4080120160200SE +/- 16.94, N = 8SE +/- 0.99, N = 4167.45191.86
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform2012-06-19 22:31performance4080120160200Min: 89.88 / Avg: 167.45 / Max: 195.35Min: 190.14 / Avg: 191.86 / Max: 193.58

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation2012-06-19 22:31performance2004006008001000SE +/- 108.21, N = 8SE +/- 3.24, N = 4796.96961.12
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation2012-06-19 22:31performance2004006008001000Min: 240.27 / Avg: 796.96 / Max: 973.29Min: 952.13 / Avg: 961.12 / Max: 967.15

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Monte Carlo2012-06-19 22:31performance100200300400500SE +/- 41.72, N = 8SE +/- 2.33, N = 4402.31446.97
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Monte Carlo2012-06-19 22:31performance80160240320400Min: 110.47 / Avg: 402.31 / Max: 451.15Min: 441.87 / Avg: 446.97 / Max: 453.06

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply2012-06-19 22:31performance30060090012001500SE +/- 130.09, N = 8SE +/- 7.84, N = 41343.601473.51
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply2012-06-19 22:31performance30060090012001500Min: 433.9 / Avg: 1343.6 / Max: 1494.89Min: 1457.65 / Avg: 1473.51 / Max: 1494.89

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization2012-06-19 22:31performance400800120016002000SE +/- 187.70, N = 7SE +/- 5.25, N = 31605.261779.79
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization2012-06-19 22:31performance30060090012001500Min: 479.62 / Avg: 1605.26 / Max: 1807.91Min: 1771.87 / Avg: 1779.79 / Max: 1789.71