medion_amd+geforce AMD Athlon XP 2000+ testing with a MSI MS-6738 and NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 on Ubuntu 12.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. amb+geforce: Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 495MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 (249/333MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-24-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 nvdia: Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 748MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 128MB (324/551MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-24-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, OpenGL: 1.5 Mesa 8.0.2 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 nvidia5600: Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 748MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 128MB (324/551MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-24-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, OpenGL: 1.5 Mesa 8.0.2 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 fx5600: Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 748MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 128MB (324/551MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-25-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, OpenGL: 1.5 Mesa 8.0.2 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 geforce3-ti200: Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 748MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 200 (174/400MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-25-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, OpenGL: 1.2 Mesa 8.0.2, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 geforce33-ti200: Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 748MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 200 (174/400MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-25-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, OpenGL: 1.2 Mesa 8.0.2, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 ti200-overclock: Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 748MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 200 (248/400MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-25-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, OpenGL: 1.2 Mesa 8.0.2, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 GtkPerf 0.40 GtkComboBox Seconds < Lower Is Better amb+geforce . 172.15 |================================================== nvdia ....... 194.34 |========================================================= GtkPerf 0.40 GtkDrawingArea - Pixbufs Seconds < Lower Is Better amb+geforce . 45.84 |========================================================== nvdia ....... 23.53 |============================== GtkPerf 0.40 GtkRadioButton Seconds < Lower Is Better amb+geforce . 108.75 |========================================================= nvdia ....... 91.47 |================================================ QGears2 XRender + Gears Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better amb+geforce . 32.87 |========================================================== nvdia ....... 29.31 |==================================================== QGears2 XRender + Text Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better amb+geforce . 31.89 |========================================================== nvdia ....... 30.80 |======================================================== QGears2 XRender + Image Scaling Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better amb+geforce . 60.97 |======================================================= nvdia ....... 63.86 |========================================================== QGears2 OpenGL + Image Scaling Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better amb+geforce . 94.81 |===================== nvdia ....... 254.01 |========================================================= QGears2 OpenGL + Gears Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better nvdia . 79.75 |================================================================ JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 19519.81 |=========================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 22641.75 |================================================== ti200-overclock . 23277.12 |=================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 8776.89 |======================================= geforce3-ti200 .. 8826.20 |======================================= ti200-overclock . 11556.92 |=================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 28320.00 |=================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 26875.16 |================================================ ti200-overclock . 28166.87 |=================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 4669.31 |========================================= geforce3-ti200 .. 5335.89 |=============================================== ti200-overclock . 5936.43 |==================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 61653.10 |============================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 67644.31 |=================================================== ti200-overclock . 67884.92 |=================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 43297.40 |=================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 18088.21 |===================== ti200-overclock . 23406.37 |============================ JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 141374.56 |================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 98967.22 |=================================== ti200-overclock . 130460.40 |============================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 14951.51 |=================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 9350.10 |================================ ti200-overclock . 11963.13 |========================================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 240.41 |============================================ geforce3-ti200 .. 263.36 |================================================ ti200-overclock . 287.92 |===================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 17.56 |================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 16.90 |================================================ ti200-overclock . 18.86 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 204.10 |================================================ geforce3-ti200 .. 196.98 |=============================================== ti200-overclock . 223.16 |===================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 14.61 |===================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 13.24 |================================================ ti200-overclock . 15.00 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 536.58 |=================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 494.64 |=============================================== ti200-overclock . 559.07 |===================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 67.69 |====================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 56.76 |============================================= ti200-overclock . 62.96 |================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 1082.99 |=============================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 1089.06 |=============================================== ti200-overclock . 1208.75 |==================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 85.88 |====================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 70.16 |============================================ ti200-overclock . 79.99 |================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 6509.34 |================================================ geforce3-ti200 .. 6508.64 |================================================ ti200-overclock . 6998.44 |==================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 631.51 |==================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 593.64 |================================================= ti200-overclock . 641.38 |===================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 23286.31 |=================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 22572.60 |================================================= ti200-overclock . 21966.52 |================================================ JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 10685.68 |=================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 9132.99 |============================================ ti200-overclock . 8878.20 |========================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 10428.40 |======================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 13139.12 |=================================================== ti200-overclock . 12839.91 |================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 5624.31 |================================================== geforce3-ti200 .. 5825.48 |==================================================== ti200-overclock . 5410.25 |================================================ x11perf 1.5 Test: 500px PutImage Square Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 11.50 |=============== fx5600 .......... 30.40 |======================================= geforce33-ti200 . 40.20 |==================================================== ti200-overclock . 41.70 |====================================================== x11perf 1.5 Test: Scrolling 500 x 500 px Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 2198 |========================================== fx5600 .......... 2850 |======================================================= geforce33-ti200 . 1167 |======================= ti200-overclock . 1530 |============================== x11perf 1.5 Test: Fill 300 x 300px AA Trapezoid Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 1093 |============================================== fx5600 .......... 1307 |======================================================= geforce33-ti200 . 487 |==================== ti200-overclock . 486 |==================== x11perf 1.5 Test: 500px Copy From Window To Window Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 6863 |======================================================= fx5600 .......... 3047 |======================== geforce33-ti200 . 1150 |========= ti200-overclock . 1473 |============ x11perf 1.5 Test: 500px Compositing From Pixmap To Window Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 22470 |====================================================== fx5600 .......... 3070 |======= geforce33-ti200 . 1153 |=== ti200-overclock . 1540 |==== x11perf 1.5 Test: 500px Compositing From Window To Window Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 2663 |================================================ fx5600 .......... 3043 |======================================================= geforce33-ti200 . 1160 |===================== ti200-overclock . 1520 |=========================== x11perf 1.5 Test: Copy 500x500 From Pixmap To Pixmap Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 2673 |================================================ fx5600 .......... 3067 |======================================================= geforce33-ti200 . 1157 |===================== ti200-overclock . 1490 |=========================== x11perf 1.5 Test: PutImage XY 500x500 Square Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 0.30 |======================================================= fx5600 .......... 0.10 |================== geforce33-ti200 . 0.10 |================== ti200-overclock . 0.10 |================== x11perf 1.5 Test: Char in 80-char aa line Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 144167 |=============== fx5600 .......... 500667 |===================================================== geforce33-ti200 . 425667 |============================================= ti200-overclock . 445000 |=============================================== OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 800 x 600 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better fx5600 . 25 |================================================================== GtkPerf 0.40 GTK Widget: GtkComboBox Seconds < Lower Is Better ti200-overclock . 182.97 |===================================================== GtkPerf 0.40 GTK Widget: GtkComboBoxEntry Seconds < Lower Is Better ti200-overclock . 126.01 |===================================================== GtkPerf 0.40 GTK Widget: GtkToggleButton Seconds < Lower Is Better ti200-overclock . 71.93 |====================================================== GtkPerf 0.40 GTK Widget: GtkCheckButton Seconds < Lower Is Better ti200-overclock . 42.00 |====================================================== GtkPerf 0.40 GTK Widget: GtkRadioButton Seconds < Lower Is Better ti200-overclock . 87.74 |====================================================== GtkPerf 0.40 GTK Widget: GtkTextView - Scroll Seconds < Lower Is Better ti200-overclock . 0.65 |======================================================= GtkPerf 0.40 GTK Widget: GtkDrawingArea - Circles Seconds < Lower Is Better ti200-overclock . 146.87 |===================================================== GtkPerf 0.40 GTK Widget: GtkDrawingArea - Pixbufs Seconds < Lower Is Better ti200-overclock . 46.03 |======================================================