AMD Athlon XP 2000+ testing with a MSI MS-6738 and NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 on Ubuntu 12.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1206162-AR-MEDIONAMD44
medion_amd+geforce
AMD Athlon XP 2000+ testing with a MSI MS-6738 and NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 on Ubuntu 12.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
amb+geforce:
Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 495MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 (249/333MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102
OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-24-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050
nvdia:
Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 748MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 128MB (324/551MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102
OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-24-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, OpenGL: 1.5 Mesa 8.0.2 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050
nvidia5600:
Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 748MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 128MB (324/551MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102
OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-24-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, OpenGL: 1.5 Mesa 8.0.2 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050
fx5600:
Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 748MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 128MB (324/551MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102
OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-25-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, OpenGL: 1.5 Mesa 8.0.2 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050
QGears2
XRender + Gears
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
amb+geforce . 32.87 |==========================================================
nvdia ....... 29.31 |====================================================
QGears2
XRender + Text
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
amb+geforce . 31.89 |==========================================================
nvdia ....... 30.80 |========================================================
QGears2
XRender + Image Scaling
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
amb+geforce . 60.97 |=======================================================
nvdia ....... 63.86 |==========================================================
QGears2
OpenGL + Image Scaling
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
amb+geforce . 94.81 |=====================
nvdia ....... 254.01 |=========================================================
QGears2
OpenGL + Gears
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvdia . 79.75 |================================================================
OpenArena 0.8.8
Resolution: 800 x 600
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
fx5600 . 25 |==================================================================
x11perf 1.5
Test: 500px PutImage Square
Operations / Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 11.50 |======================
fx5600 ..... 30.40 |===========================================================
x11perf 1.5
Test: Scrolling 500 x 500 px
Operations / Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 2198 |==============================================
fx5600 ..... 2850 |============================================================
x11perf 1.5
Test: Fill 300 x 300px AA Trapezoid
Operations / Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 1093 |==================================================
fx5600 ..... 1307 |============================================================
x11perf 1.5
Test: 500px Copy From Window To Window
Operations / Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 6863 |============================================================
fx5600 ..... 3047 |===========================
x11perf 1.5
Test: 500px Compositing From Pixmap To Window
Operations / Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 22470 |===========================================================
fx5600 ..... 3070 |========
x11perf 1.5
Test: 500px Compositing From Window To Window
Operations / Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 2663 |=====================================================
fx5600 ..... 3043 |============================================================
x11perf 1.5
Test: Copy 500x500 From Pixmap To Pixmap
Operations / Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 2673 |====================================================
fx5600 ..... 3067 |============================================================
x11perf 1.5
Test: PutImage XY 500x500 Square
Operations / Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 0.30 |============================================================
fx5600 ..... 0.10 |====================
x11perf 1.5
Test: Char in 80-char aa line
Operations / Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 144167 |=================
fx5600 ..... 500667 |==========================================================
JXRenderMark 1.0.1
Test: Rects Composition - Size: 32x32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 19519.81 |========================================================
JXRenderMark 1.0.1
Test: Rects Composition - Size: 128x128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 8776.89 |=========================================================
JXRenderMark 1.0.1
Test: Put Composition - Size: 32x32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 28320.00 |========================================================
JXRenderMark 1.0.1
Test: Put Composition - Size: 128x128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 4669.31 |=========================================================
JXRenderMark 1.0.1
Test: Simple Blit - Size: 32x32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 61653.10 |========================================================
JXRenderMark 1.0.1
Test: Simple Blit - Size: 128x128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 43297.40 |========================================================
JXRenderMark 1.0.1
Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 32x32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 141374.56 |=======================================================
JXRenderMark 1.0.1
Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 128x128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 14951.51 |========================================================
JXRenderMark 1.0.1
Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 32x32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 240.41 |==========================================================
JXRenderMark 1.0.1
Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 128x128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 17.56 |===========================================================
JXRenderMark 1.0.1
Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 32x32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 204.10 |==========================================================
JXRenderMark 1.0.1
Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 128x128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 14.61 |===========================================================
JXRenderMark 1.0.1
Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 32x32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 536.58 |==========================================================
JXRenderMark 1.0.1
Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 128x128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 67.69 |===========================================================
JXRenderMark 1.0.1
Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 32x32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 1082.99 |=========================================================
JXRenderMark 1.0.1
Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 128x128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 85.88 |===========================================================
JXRenderMark 1.0.1
Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 32x32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 6509.34 |=========================================================
JXRenderMark 1.0.1
Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 128x128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 631.51 |==========================================================
JXRenderMark 1.0.1
Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 32x32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 23286.31 |========================================================
JXRenderMark 1.0.1
Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 128x128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 10685.68 |========================================================
JXRenderMark 1.0.1
Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 32x32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 10428.40 |========================================================
JXRenderMark 1.0.1
Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 128x128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nvidia5600 . 5624.31 |=========================================================
GtkPerf 0.40
GtkComboBox
Seconds < Lower Is Better
amb+geforce . 172.15 |==================================================
nvdia ....... 194.34 |=========================================================
GtkPerf 0.40
GtkDrawingArea - Pixbufs
Seconds < Lower Is Better
amb+geforce . 45.84 |==========================================================
nvdia ....... 23.53 |==============================
GtkPerf 0.40
GtkRadioButton
Seconds < Lower Is Better
amb+geforce . 108.75 |=========================================================
nvdia ....... 91.47 |================================================