Test throughput. All cores are at 100% or almost
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1205212-SU-1107228IV84
1090T_throughput
Test throughput. All cores are at 100% or almost
1090T @ 3.2GHz:
Processor: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T @ 3.20GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770-DS3, Chipset: ATI RX780/RX790 + SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0, Memory: 7680MB, Disk: 500GB SAMSUNG HD501LJ + 1000GB Seagate ST31000520AS, Graphics: ATI Radeon HD 4800 512MB (575/900MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC888, Monitor: CMC 22 W
OS: Ubuntu 11.04, Kernel: 2.6.38-10-generic (x86_64), Desktop: KDE 4.6.5, Display Server: X Server 1.10.1, Display Driver: fglrx 8.84.60 Catalyst 11.5, OpenGL: 3.3.10665, Compiler: GCC 4.5.2 + Open64 4.2.5.1, File-System: ext2/ext3, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050
1090T @ 3.7GHz:
Processor: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T @ 3.70GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770-DS3, Chipset: ATI RX780/RX790 + SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0, Memory: 7680MB, Disk: 500GB SAMSUNG HD501LJ + 1000GB Seagate ST31000520AS, Graphics: ATI Radeon HD 4800 512MB (575/900MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC888, Monitor: CMC 22 W
OS: Ubuntu 11.04, Kernel: 2.6.38-10-generic (x86_64), Desktop: KDE 4.6.5, Display Server: X Server 1.10.1, Display Driver: fglrx 8.84.60 Catalyst 11.5, OpenGL: 3.3.10665, Compiler: GCC 4.5.2 + Open64 4.2.5.1, File-System: ext2/ext3, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050
1090T @ 3.4GHz GCC-4.7:
Processor: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T @ 3.40GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770-DS3, Chipset: AMD ATI RX780/RX790 + SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0, Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 500GB SAMSUNG HD501LJ + 1000GB Seagate ST31000520AS, Graphics: AMD Radeon HD 6800 1024MB, Audio: Realtek ALC888, Monitor: CMC 22 W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168B
OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-24-generic (x86_64), Desktop: KDE 4.8.3, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: fglrx 8.96.4 Catalyst 12.4, Compiler: GCC 4.7.0 + Open64 4.2.5.2, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1400x1050
Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2
Global Illumination + Image Synthesis
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1090T @ 3.2GHz ......... 4.49 |================================================
1090T @ 3.7GHz ......... 4.27 |==============================================
1090T @ 3.4GHz GCC-4.7 . 4.47 |================================================
Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.0-rc3
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1090T @ 3.2GHz ......... 60.49 |=========================================
1090T @ 3.7GHz ......... 55.49 |======================================
1090T @ 3.4GHz GCC-4.7 . 69.29 |===============================================
Timed Apache Compilation 2.2.17
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1090T @ 3.2GHz ......... 7.46 |===============================================
1090T @ 3.7GHz ......... 7.37 |===============================================
1090T @ 3.4GHz GCC-4.7 . 7.58 |================================================
Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2
Pfam Database Search
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1090T @ 3.2GHz ......... 14.30 |===============================================
1090T @ 3.7GHz ......... 13.48 |============================================
1090T @ 3.4GHz GCC-4.7 . 13.85 |==============================================
Smallpt 1.0
Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1090T @ 3.2GHz ......... 130 |=================================================
1090T @ 3.7GHz ......... 112 |==========================================
1090T @ 3.4GHz GCC-4.7 . 39 |===============
x264 2010-11-22
H.264 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1090T @ 3.2GHz ......... 96.72 |=========================================
1090T @ 3.7GHz ......... 109.43 |==============================================
1090T @ 3.4GHz GCC-4.7 . 103.98 |============================================
Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.0.5
256MB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1090T @ 3.2GHz ......... 10.10 |===============================================
1090T @ 3.7GHz ......... 9.49 |============================================
1090T @ 3.4GHz GCC-4.7 . 9.90 |==============================================
7-Zip Compression 9.13
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
1090T @ 3.2GHz ......... 14754 |=============================================
1090T @ 3.7GHz ......... 15286 |===============================================
1090T @ 3.4GHz GCC-4.7 . 15410 |===============================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: LU.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1090T @ 3.2GHz ......... 8798.89 |=========================================
1090T @ 3.7GHz ......... 8966.32 |==========================================
1090T @ 3.4GHz GCC-4.7 . 9566.45 |=============================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: EP.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1090T @ 3.2GHz ......... 150.57 |========================================
1090T @ 3.7GHz ......... 173.23 |==============================================
1090T @ 3.4GHz GCC-4.7 . 167.02 |============================================
C-Ray 1.1
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1090T @ 3.2GHz ......... 67.84 |===============================================
1090T @ 3.7GHz ......... 58.80 |=========================================
1090T @ 3.4GHz GCC-4.7 . 36.14 |=========================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.12
Operation: Local Adaptive Thresholding
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
1090T @ 3.2GHz ......... 64 |==============================================
1090T @ 3.7GHz ......... 70 |==================================================
1090T @ 3.4GHz GCC-4.7 . 67 |================================================