Core 2 Duo multicore
Intel Core 2 6600 testing with a American Megatrends P2.30 and NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT 1024MB on Ubuntu 12.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Core 2 Duo multicore: 

	Processor: Intel Core 2 6600 @ 2.31GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: American Megatrends P2.30, Chipset: VIA PT880 Ultra/PT894, Memory: 2048MB, Disk: 40GB Western Digital WD400JB-00EN, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT 1024MB (550/400MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC888, Network: VIA VT6102

	OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-24-generic-pae (i686), Desktop: Unity 5.10.0, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 295.40, OpenGL: 3.3.0 NVIDIA 295.40, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768


7-Zip Compression 9.20.1
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 3186 |==================================================


Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.0.5
256MB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 47.80 |=================================================


x264 2011-12-06
H.264 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 22.79 |=================================================


OpenSSL 1.0.0e
RSA 4096-bit Performance
Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 14.70 |=================================================


John The Ripper 1.7.9
Test: Blowfish
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 1100 |==================================================


GraphicsMagick 1.3.12
Operation: Local Adaptive Thresholding
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 20 |====================================================


GraphicsMagick 1.3.12
Operation: Resizing
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 51 |====================================================


Himeno Benchmark 3.0
Poisson Pressure Solver
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 645.23 |================================================


C-Ray 1.1
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 427.25 |================================================


POV-Ray 3.6.1
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 1076 |==================================================


Smallpt 1.0
Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 702 |===================================================


Crafty 23.4
Elapsed Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 0.01 |==================================================


Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2
Pfam Database Search
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 66.44 |=================================================


Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.864
Multiple Sequence Alignment
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 29.03 |=================================================


Minion 0.12
Benchmark: Quasigroup
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 307.93 |================================================


Minion 0.12
Benchmark: Solitaire
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 216.63 |================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: EP.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 30.11 |=================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: IS.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 72.79 |=================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: LU.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 1563.40 |===============================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: UA.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 5.65 |==================================================


Timed PHP Compilation 5.2.9
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 110.20 |================================================