ibm-java
VMware testing on CentOS 6.1 (Final) via the Phoronix Test Suite.


IBM X-Series Blade Java Suite: 

	Processor: Intel Xeon X5670 @ 2.93GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: Intel 440BX, Chipset: Intel 440BX/ZX/DX, Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 21GB Virtual disk, Graphics: VMware SVGA II, Network: Intel 82545EM Gigabit

	OS: CentOS 6.1 (Final), Kernel: 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.4.5 20110214, File-System: ext4, System Layer: VMware

2012-04-26 12:37: 

	Processor: Intel Xeon X5670 @ 2.93GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: Intel 440BX, Chipset: Intel 440BX/ZX/DX, Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 21GB Virtual disk, Graphics: VMware SVGA II, Network: Intel 82545EM Gigabit

	OS: CentOS 6.1 (Final), Kernel: 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.4.5 20110214, File-System: ext4, System Layer: VMware


Bork File Encrypter 1.4
File Encryption Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
IBM X-Series Blade Java Suite . 21.63 |========================================
2012-04-26 12:37 .............. 20.88 |=======================================


Java SciMark 2.0
FFT Performance
Mflops > Higher Is Better
IBM X-Series Blade Java Suite . 636.58 |=======================================
2012-04-26 12:37 .............. 636.53 |=======================================


Java SciMark 2.0
SOR Performance
Mflops > Higher Is Better
IBM X-Series Blade Java Suite . 1167.14 |======================================
2012-04-26 12:37 .............. 1167.32 |======================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Monte Carlo Performance
Mflops > Higher Is Better
IBM X-Series Blade Java Suite . 552.81 |=======================================
2012-04-26 12:37 .............. 556.24 |=======================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Composite Performance
Mflops > Higher Is Better
IBM X-Series Blade Java Suite . 1062.64 |======================================
2012-04-26 12:37 .............. 1051.52 |======================================