BFS Benchmark
Intel Core i3 330M testing with a Packard Bell EasyNote TJ77 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5000 512MB on Ubuntu 11.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


When we use BFS: 

	Processor: Intel Core i3 330M @ 2.13GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Packard Bell EasyNote TJ77, Chipset: Intel Core DRAM, Memory: 3072MB, Disk: 320GB Hitachi HTS54323, Graphics: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5000 512MB (750/800MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC272X, Network: Broadcom NetLink BCM57780 Gigabit PCIe + Atheros AR928X Wireless

	OS: Ubuntu 11.10, Kernel: 3.3.2-14.04.12-bfs-bfq (x86_64), Desktop: KDE 4.8.2, Display Server: X Server 1.10.4, Display Driver: fglrx 8.95.3 Catalyst 12.1, OpenGL: 4.2.11566, Compiler: GCC 4.6.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1366x768


Crafty 23.4
Elapsed Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
When we use BFS . 159.23 |=====================================================


John The Ripper 1.7.9
Test: Traditional DES
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
When we use BFS . 4626667 |====================================================


BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6
Computational Test: Dhrystone 2
LPS > Higher Is Better
When we use BFS . 13639172.97 |================================================


BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6
Computational Test: Register Arithmetic
LPS > Higher Is Better
When we use BFS . 1 |==========================================================


BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6
Computational Test: Integer Arithmetic
LPS > Higher Is Better
When we use BFS . 1 |==========================================================


BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6
Computational Test: Floating-Point Arithmetic
LPS > Higher Is Better
When we use BFS . 1 |==========================================================


7-Zip Compression 9.20.1
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
When we use BFS . 4358 |=======================================================


dcraw
RAW To PPM Image Conversion
Seconds < Lower Is Better
When we use BFS . 149.48 |=====================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: BT.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
When we use BFS . 2189.20 |====================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
When we use BFS . 476.30 |=====================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
When we use BFS . 116.19 |=====================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
When we use BFS . 587.34 |=====================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
When we use BFS . 247.03 |=====================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
When we use BFS . 689.10 |=====================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
When we use BFS . 741.85 |=====================================================