wine-1.4-rc4

wine-1.4-rc4 testing on Gentoo Base 2.0.3 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1203179-STEF-WINE14R77
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
imac-arb: wine-1.4-rc4
March 17 2012
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

imac-arb: wine-1.4-rc4

Processor: Intel Core 2 T7200 @ 2.00GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: Apple Mac-F42786A9, Memory: 3072MB, Disk: 160GB Western Digital WD1600JS-40T, Graphics: Gallium 0.4 on ATI RV530 128MB, Audio: SigmaTel STAC9221 A1, Monitor: Color LCD

OS: Gentoo Base 2.0.3, Kernel: 3.2.11-gentoo (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME 2.32.1, Display Server: X Server 1.11.2, Display Driver: radeon 6.14.3, System Layer: wine-1.4-rc4

streamsrc_d3d

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterstreamsrc_d3d 1.0No descriptionimac-arb: wine-1.4-rc4816243240SE +/- 0.47, N = 334.09

drawprim_d3d

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterdrawprim_d3d 1.0No descriptionimac-arb: wine-1.4-rc41122334455SE +/- 0.75, N = 549.79

clear_d3d

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterclear_d3d 1.0No descriptionimac-arb: wine-1.4-rc4246810SE +/- 0.04, N = 36.67

3DMark 2001

OpenBenchmarking.org3DMarks, More Is Better3DMark 2001 Build 330Resolution: 1024 x 768imac-arb: wine-1.4-rc412002400360048006000SE +/- 5.03, N = 35446

3DMark 2000

OpenBenchmarking.org3DMarks, More Is Better3DMark 2000 1.1Resolution: 1024 x 768imac-arb: wine-1.4-rc415003000450060007500SE +/- 0.88, N = 36850

Half Life 2

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterHalf Life 2 1.0Dxlevel: 95imac-arb: wine-1.4-rc41326395265SE +/- 0.07, N = 355.83

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterHalf Life 2 1.0Dxlevel: 81imac-arb: wine-1.4-rc41326395265SE +/- 0.07, N = 355.87

tmnations

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Bettertmnations 1.0Quality: Mediumimac-arb: wine-1.4-rc4714212835SE +/- 0.00, N = 330.60

Unigine Heaven

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 2.1Resolution: 1440 x 900imac-arb: wine-1.4-rc40.23850.4770.71550.9541.1925SE +/- 0.01, N = 31.06

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 2.1Resolution: 800 x 600imac-arb: wine-1.4-rc40.54231.08461.62692.16922.7115SE +/- 0.00, N = 32.41

10 Results Shown

streamsrc_d3d
drawprim_d3d
clear_d3d
3DMark 2001
3DMark 2000
Half Life 2:
  95
  81
tmnations
Unigine Heaven:
  1440 x 900
  800 x 600

imac-arb: wine-1.4-rc4

Processor: Intel Core 2 T7200 @ 2.00GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: Apple Mac-F42786A9, Memory: 3072MB, Disk: 160GB Western Digital WD1600JS-40T, Graphics: Gallium 0.4 on ATI RV530 128MB, Audio: SigmaTel STAC9221 A1, Monitor: Color LCD

OS: Gentoo Base 2.0.3, Kernel: 3.2.11-gentoo (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME 2.32.1, Display Server: X Server 1.11.2, Display Driver: radeon 6.14.3, System Layer: wine-1.4-rc4

Testing initiated at 17 March 2012 21:13 by user stefandoesinger.