Ubuntu 12.04 LTS ReiserFS Ubuntu 12.04 LTS bencharks with a stock/clean install but with the ReiserFS file-system on Linux 3.2 kernel as found in Precise pangolin. ReiserFS: Processor: Intel Core i5-2520M @ 2.50GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: HP 161C, Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core Family DRAM, Memory: 4096MB, Disk: 160GB INTEL SSDSA2M160, Graphics: Intel Sandybridge Mobile (GT2+), Audio: IDT 92HD81B1X5, Network: Intel 82579LM Gigabit Connection + Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-18-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 5.6.0, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: intel 2.17.0, OpenGL: 3.0 Mesa 8.0.1, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: reiserfs, Screen Resolution: 1600x900 Apache Benchmark 2.2.21 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 19235.34 |========================================================== NGINX Benchmark 1.0.11 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 26120.73 |========================================================== PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 1770 |============================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 3.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better ReiserFS . 206.08 |============================================================ Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 1 MB/s > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 111.23 |============================================================ Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 6 MB/s > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 230.75 |============================================================ Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 12 MB/s > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 297.20 |============================================================ FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 56.80 |============================================================= FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync Files/s > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 122.37 |============================================================ FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads Files/s > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 82.63 |============================================================= FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 57.37 |============================================================= IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 102.12 |============================================================ IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 213.35 |============================================================ IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 102.37 |============================================================ IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 213.20 |============================================================ IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 101.90 |============================================================ IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 213.13 |============================================================ Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 8 MB/s > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 97.84 |============================================================= Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 16 MB/s > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 98.40 |============================================================= Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Random Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 8 MB/s > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 80.14 |============================================================= Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Random Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 16 MB/s > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 84.77 |============================================================= Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Initial Create MB/s > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 85.96 |============================================================= Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Compile MB/s > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 103.77 |============================================================ Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Read Compiled Tree MB/s > Higher Is Better ReiserFS . 161.43 |============================================================ Flexible IO Tester 1.57 Test: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern Seconds (Run Time) < Lower Is Better ReiserFS . 147.65 |============================================================