Mesa 8.1-devel On Intel Sandy Bridge Intel Core i5-2520M testing with a HP 161C and Intel Sandybridge Mobile (GT2+) on Ubuntu 12.04 using Linux 3.4 DRM development code from -next tree as of 6 March. This comparison is for a future article on Phoronix.com comparing Mesa 8.0 branched Git and Mesa git master (Mesa 8.1-devel) as of today on a Sandy Bridge graphics HP EliteBook notebook.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1203068-BY-MESA81DEV13 .
Mesa 8.1-devel On Intel Sandy Bridge Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server Display Driver OpenGL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution Mesa 8.0.1 Mesa 8.1-devel git-ef3e26c Intel Core i5-2520M @ 2.50GHz (4 Cores) HP 161C Intel 2nd Generation Core Family DRAM 4096MB 160GB INTEL SSDSA2M160 Intel Sandybridge Mobile (GT2+) IDT 92HD81B1X5 Intel 82579LM Gigabit Connection + Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205 Ubuntu 12.04 3.3.0-996-generic (x86_64) Unity 5.4.0 X Server 1.11.3 intel 2.18.0 2.1 Mesa 8.0.1 (git-a308098) GCC 4.6 ext4 1600x900 2.1 Mesa 8.1-devel (git-ef3e26c) OpenBenchmarking.org System Details - Compiz was running on this system.
Mesa 8.1-devel On Intel Sandy Bridge nexuiz: 1024 x 768 - No - Off nexuiz: 1600 x 900 - No - Off xonotic: 800 x 600 lightsmark: 1600 x 900 vdrift: 1600 x 900 warsow: 1440 x 900 openarena: 1600 x 900 padman: 1600 x 900 Mesa 8.0.1 Mesa 8.1-devel git-ef3e26c 33.57 23.77 33.43 31.75 49.60 33.03 80.23 77.30 29.39 24.94 33.45 32.12 49.51 33.40 79.60 76.83 OpenBenchmarking.org
Nexuiz Resolution: 1024 x 768 - HDR: No - Sound: Off OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Nexuiz 2.5.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - HDR: No - Sound: Off Mesa 8.0.1 Mesa 8.1-devel git-ef3e26c 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 1.41, N = 6 SE +/- 0.97, N = 6 33.57 29.39
Nexuiz Resolution: 1600 x 900 - HDR: No - Sound: Off OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Nexuiz 2.5.2 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - HDR: No - Sound: Off Mesa 8.0.1 Mesa 8.1-devel git-ef3e26c 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.73, N = 6 SE +/- 0.45, N = 6 23.77 24.94
Xonotic Resolution: 800 x 600 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.5 Resolution: 800 x 600 Mesa 8.0.1 Mesa 8.1-devel git-ef3e26c 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 33.43 33.45
Lightsmark Resolution: 1600 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Lightsmark 2008 Resolution: 1600 x 900 Mesa 8.0.1 Mesa 8.1-devel git-ef3e26c 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 31.75 32.12
VDrift Resolution: 1600 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better VDrift 2010-06-30 Resolution: 1600 x 900 Mesa 8.0.1 Mesa 8.1-devel git-ef3e26c 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 49.60 49.51
Warsow Resolution: 1440 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Warsow 0.61 Resolution: 1440 x 900 Mesa 8.0.1 Mesa 8.1-devel git-ef3e26c 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 33.03 33.40
OpenArena Resolution: 1600 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better OpenArena 0.8.5 Resolution: 1600 x 900 Mesa 8.0.1 Mesa 8.1-devel git-ef3e26c 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 80.23 79.60
World of Padman Resolution: 1600 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better World of Padman 1.2 Resolution: 1600 x 900 Mesa 8.0.1 Mesa 8.1-devel git-ef3e26c 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 77.30 76.83
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4