Running pts/clomp-1.0.0.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1203041-AR-1202264AR77
tgui
Running pts/clomp-1.0.0.
i5 2400:
Processor: Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.30GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte H67N-USB3-B3, Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core Family, Memory: 2 x 4096 MB 1333MHz, Disk: 32GB OCZ VERTEX + 2000GB Western Digital WDC WD20EARS-00M, Graphics: Intel 2nd Generation Core Family IGP 256MB, Monitor: DELL E197FP
OS: Ubuntu 11.04, Kernel: 2.6.38-12-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 3.8.16, Display Driver: intel 2.14.0, Compiler: GCC 4.5.2, File-System: ext2/ext3, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024
2011-11-04 02:14:
Processor: Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.30GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte H67N-USB3-B3, Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core Family, Memory: 2 x 4096 MB 1333MHz, Disk: 32GB OCZ VERTEX + 2000GB Western Digital WDC WD20EARS-00M, Graphics: Intel 2nd Generation Core Family IGP 256MB, Monitor: DELL E197FP
OS: Ubuntu 11.04, Kernel: 2.6.38-12-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 3.8.16, Display Driver: intel 2.14.0, Compiler: GCC 4.5.2, File-System: ext2/ext3, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024
phenom 2 vs i5 2400:
Processor: AMD Phenom II X4 920 @ 3.31GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Award Software F8, Chipset: AMD RS780 + SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0, Memory: 4 x 2048 MB 800MHz, Disk: 60GB SSD G2 64 + 2 x 500GB Western Digital WDC WD5000AAKS-0, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE, Audio: Realtek ALC889A
OS: Ubuntu 11.10, Kernel: 3.0.0-12-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 4.24.0, Display Server: X Server 1.10.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap", OpenGL: Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap", Compiler: GCC 4.6.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
i7 3820 4.3 oc:
Processor: Intel Core i7-3820 @ 4.30GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte X79-UD3, Chipset: Intel Sandy DMI2, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 60GB SSD G2 64 + 2 x 500GB Western Digital WD5000AAKS-0 + 750GB Western Digital WD7500AAKS-2, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE 1024MB (648/1700MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC898, Network: Intel 82579V Gigabit Connection
OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-17-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 5.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 295.20, OpenGL: 4.2.0 NVIDIA 295.20, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1:
Processor: Intel Core i7-3820 @ 5.90GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte X79-UD3, Chipset: Intel Sandy DMI2, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 60GB SSD G2 64 + 2 x 500GB Western Digital WD5000AAKS-0 + 750GB Western Digital WD7500AAKS-2, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE 1024MB (648/1700MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC898, Network: Intel 82579V Gigabit Connection
OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-17-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 2D 5.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 295.20, OpenGL: 4.2.0 NVIDIA 295.20, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
Crafty 23.3
Elapsed Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
i5 2400 . 362.80 |=============================================================
CLOMP 3.3
Static OMP Speedup
Speedup > Higher Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 3.27 |===========================
i5 2400 ..................... 3.25 |===========================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 0.36 |===
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 3.28 |===========================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 5.18 |===========================================
Stream 2009-04-11
Type: Copy
MB/s > Higher Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 12797.65 |=================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 8063.79 |===========
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 24207.52 |=================================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 28969.38 |=======================================
Stream 2009-04-11
Type: Scale
MB/s > Higher Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 12503.41 |==================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 7902.34 |===========
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 23412.23 |=================================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 27790.98 |=======================================
Stream 2009-04-11
Type: Add
MB/s > Higher Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 13708.78 |==================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 8577.86 |===========
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 25240.06 |================================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 30388.49 |=======================================
Stream 2009-04-11
Type: Triad
MB/s > Higher Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 13930.72 |=================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 8658.77 |===========
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 25580.67 |================================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 31390.06 |=======================================
FLAC Audio Encoding 1.2.1
WAV To FLAC
Seconds < Lower Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 6.80 |====================================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 8.20 |===========================================
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 5.04 |==========================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 5.51 |=============================
LAME MP3 Encoding 3.98.2
WAV To MP3
Seconds < Lower Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 21.00 |==============================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 29.07 |==========================================
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 15.96 |=======================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 15.97 |=======================
Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.706
Multiple Sequence Alignment
Seconds < Lower Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 21.54 |===============================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 29.35 |==========================================
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 16.10 |=======================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 15.98 |=======================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: BT.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 10746.09 |========================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 4993.07 |===========
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 13776.66 |===============================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 17362.02 |=======================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: CG.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 2264.39 |==============================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 1425.65 |===================
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 2264.91 |==============================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 2988.45 |========================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: EP.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 126.92 |==================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 92.26 |=============
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 273.96 |======================================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 291.85 |=========================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: FT.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 5617.62 |=========================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 3888.09 |=================
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 7898.77 |===================================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 9081.84 |========================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: IS.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 167.92 |================================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 82.99 |================
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 214.95 |========================================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 218.40 |=========================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: LU.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 8978.98 |=====================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 4713.26 |===========
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 12649.04 |==============================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 16608.23 |=======================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: MG.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 5583.22 |=====================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 2823.83 |===========
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 7559.17 |============================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 10436.72 |=======================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: SP.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 5396.22 |======================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 2658.21 |===========
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 6831.91 |============================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 9594.82 |========================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: UA.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 33.66 |=====================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 21.77 |=============
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 43.85 |===========================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 67.91 |==========================================
Timed Apache Compilation 2.2.17
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 29.30 |=================================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 37.81 |==========================================
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 17.28 |===================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 17.05 |===================
7-Zip Compression 9.13
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
2011-11-04 02:14 ............ 11795 |=====================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 8869 |================
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 22211 |=======================================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 23783 |==========================================
John The Ripper 1.7.8
Test: Traditional DES
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 4279333 |================================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 2430333 |==================
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 5394000 |========================================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 5076833 |======================================
John The Ripper 1.7.8
Test: MD5
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 13004 |===============================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 14989 |====================================
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 17223 |==========================================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 17369 |==========================================
John The Ripper 1.7.8
Test: Blowfish
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 814 |===============================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 988 |======================================
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 1112 |===========================================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 1116 |===========================================
Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.0.5
256MB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 11.72 |=========================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 19.56 |==========================================
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 6.80 |===============
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 6.41 |==============
FFmpeg 0.8.2
AVI To NTSC VCD
Seconds < Lower Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 14.98 |==========================================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 12.69 |====================================
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 7.43 |=====================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 6.56 |==================
OpenSSL 1.0.0a
RSA 4096-bit Performance
Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 79.10 |===============================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 62.30 |========================
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 104.73 |=========================================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 103.25 |========================================
BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6
Computational Test: Dhrystone 2
LPS > Higher Is Better
i5 2400 ..................... 22778420.20 |============================
phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 17650950.77 |=====================
i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 29798132.73 |====================================
Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 29186384.07 |===================================