tgui Running pts/clomp-1.0.0. i5 2400: Processor: Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.30GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte H67N-USB3-B3, Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core Family, Memory: 2 x 4096 MB 1333MHz, Disk: 32GB OCZ VERTEX + 2000GB Western Digital WDC WD20EARS-00M, Graphics: Intel 2nd Generation Core Family IGP 256MB, Monitor: DELL E197FP OS: Ubuntu 11.04, Kernel: 2.6.38-12-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 3.8.16, Display Driver: intel 2.14.0, Compiler: GCC 4.5.2, File-System: ext2/ext3, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024 2011-11-04 02:14: Processor: Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.30GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte H67N-USB3-B3, Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core Family, Memory: 2 x 4096 MB 1333MHz, Disk: 32GB OCZ VERTEX + 2000GB Western Digital WDC WD20EARS-00M, Graphics: Intel 2nd Generation Core Family IGP 256MB, Monitor: DELL E197FP OS: Ubuntu 11.04, Kernel: 2.6.38-12-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 3.8.16, Display Driver: intel 2.14.0, Compiler: GCC 4.5.2, File-System: ext2/ext3, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024 phenom 2 vs i5 2400: Processor: AMD Phenom II X4 920 @ 3.31GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Award Software F8, Chipset: AMD RS780 + SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0, Memory: 4 x 2048 MB 800MHz, Disk: 60GB SSD G2 64 + 2 x 500GB Western Digital WDC WD5000AAKS-0, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE, Audio: Realtek ALC889A OS: Ubuntu 11.10, Kernel: 3.0.0-12-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 4.24.0, Display Server: X Server 1.10.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap", OpenGL: Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap", Compiler: GCC 4.6.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 i7 3820 4.3 oc: Processor: Intel Core i7-3820 @ 4.30GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte X79-UD3, Chipset: Intel Sandy DMI2, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 60GB SSD G2 64 + 2 x 500GB Western Digital WD5000AAKS-0 + 750GB Western Digital WD7500AAKS-2, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE 1024MB (648/1700MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC898, Network: Intel 82579V Gigabit Connection OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-17-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 5.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 295.20, OpenGL: 4.2.0 NVIDIA 295.20, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1: Processor: Intel Core i7-3820 @ 5.90GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte X79-UD3, Chipset: Intel Sandy DMI2, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 60GB SSD G2 64 + 2 x 500GB Western Digital WD5000AAKS-0 + 750GB Western Digital WD7500AAKS-2, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE 1024MB (648/1700MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC898, Network: Intel 82579V Gigabit Connection OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-17-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 2D 5.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 295.20, OpenGL: 4.2.0 NVIDIA 295.20, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 CLOMP 3.3 Static OMP Speedup Speedup > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 3.27 |=========================== i5 2400 ..................... 3.25 |=========================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 0.36 |=== i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 3.28 |=========================== Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 5.18 |=========================================== Timed Apache Compilation 2.2.17 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 29.30 |================================= phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 37.81 |========================================== i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 17.28 |=================== Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 17.05 |=================== BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 LPS > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 22778420.20 |============================ phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 17650950.77 |===================== i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 29798132.73 |==================================== Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 29186384.07 |=================================== 7-Zip Compression 9.13 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better 2011-11-04 02:14 ............ 11795 |===================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 8869 |================ i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 22211 |======================================= Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 23783 |========================================== LAME MP3 Encoding 3.98.2 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 21.00 |============================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 29.07 |========================================== i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 15.96 |======================= Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 15.97 |======================= John The Ripper 1.7.8 Test: Traditional DES Real C/S > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 4279333 |================================ phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 2430333 |================== i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 5394000 |======================================== Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 5076833 |====================================== John The Ripper 1.7.8 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 13004 |=============================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 14989 |==================================== i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 17223 |========================================== Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 17369 |========================================== John The Ripper 1.7.8 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 814 |=============================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 988 |====================================== i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 1112 |=========================================== Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 1116 |=========================================== FFmpeg 0.8.2 AVI To NTSC VCD Seconds < Lower Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 14.98 |========================================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 12.69 |==================================== i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 7.43 |===================== Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 6.56 |================== Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.0.5 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 11.72 |========================= phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 19.56 |========================================== i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 6.80 |=============== Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 6.41 |============== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.2.1 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 6.80 |==================================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 8.20 |=========================================== i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 5.04 |========================== Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 5.51 |============================= OpenSSL 1.0.0a RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 79.10 |=============================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 62.30 |======================== i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 104.73 |========================================= Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 103.25 |======================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: BT.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 10746.09 |======================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 4993.07 |=========== i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 13776.66 |=============================== Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 17362.02 |======================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: CG.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 2264.39 |============================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 1425.65 |=================== i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 2264.91 |============================== Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 2988.45 |======================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: EP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 126.92 |================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 92.26 |============= i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 273.96 |====================================== Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 291.85 |========================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: FT.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 5617.62 |========================= phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 3888.09 |================= i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 7898.77 |=================================== Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 9081.84 |======================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: IS.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 167.92 |================================ phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 82.99 |================ i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 214.95 |======================================== Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 218.40 |========================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: LU.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 8978.98 |===================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 4713.26 |=========== i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 12649.04 |============================== Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 16608.23 |======================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: MG.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 5583.22 |===================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 2823.83 |=========== i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 7559.17 |============================ Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 10436.72 |======================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: SP.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 5396.22 |====================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 2658.21 |=========== i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 6831.91 |============================ Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 9594.82 |======================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: UA.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 33.66 |===================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 21.77 |============= i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 43.85 |=========================== Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 67.91 |========================================== Stream 2009-04-11 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 12797.65 |================= phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 8063.79 |=========== i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 24207.52 |================================= Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 28969.38 |======================================= Stream 2009-04-11 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 12503.41 |================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 7902.34 |=========== i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 23412.23 |================================= Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 27790.98 |======================================= Stream 2009-04-11 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 13708.78 |================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 8577.86 |=========== i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 25240.06 |================================ Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 30388.49 |======================================= Stream 2009-04-11 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 13930.72 |================= phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 8658.77 |=========== i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 25580.67 |================================ Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 31390.06 |======================================= Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.706 Multiple Sequence Alignment Seconds < Lower Is Better i5 2400 ..................... 21.54 |=============================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 ......... 29.35 |========================================== i7 3820 4.3 oc .............. 16.10 |======================= Core i7 3820 @ 4.5GHz DRAM1 . 15.98 |======================= Crafty 23.3 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better i5 2400 . 362.80 |=============================================================