tgui Running pts/clomp-1.0.0. i5 2400: Processor: Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.30GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte H67N-USB3-B3, Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core Family, Memory: 2 x 4096 MB 1333MHz, Disk: 32GB OCZ VERTEX + 2000GB Western Digital WDC WD20EARS-00M, Graphics: Intel 2nd Generation Core Family IGP 256MB, Monitor: DELL E197FP OS: Ubuntu 11.04, Kernel: 2.6.38-12-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 3.8.16, Display Driver: intel 2.14.0, Compiler: GCC 4.5.2, File-System: ext2/ext3, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024 2011-11-04 02:14: Processor: Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.30GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte H67N-USB3-B3, Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core Family, Memory: 2 x 4096 MB 1333MHz, Disk: 32GB OCZ VERTEX + 2000GB Western Digital WDC WD20EARS-00M, Graphics: Intel 2nd Generation Core Family IGP 256MB, Monitor: DELL E197FP OS: Ubuntu 11.04, Kernel: 2.6.38-12-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 3.8.16, Display Driver: intel 2.14.0, Compiler: GCC 4.5.2, File-System: ext2/ext3, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024 phenom 2 vs i5 2400: Processor: AMD Phenom II X4 920 @ 3.31GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Award Software F8, Chipset: AMD RS780 + SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0, Memory: 4 x 2048 MB 800MHz, Disk: 60GB SSD G2 64 + 2 x 500GB Western Digital WDC WD5000AAKS-0, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE, Audio: Realtek ALC889A OS: Ubuntu 11.10, Kernel: 3.0.0-12-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 4.24.0, Display Server: X Server 1.10.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap", OpenGL: Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap", Compiler: GCC 4.6.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 i7 3820 4.3 oc: Processor: Intel Core i7-3820 @ 4.30GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte X79-UD3, Chipset: Intel Sandy DMI2, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 60GB SSD G2 64 + 2 x 500GB Western Digital WD5000AAKS-0 + 750GB Western Digital WD7500AAKS-2, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE 1024MB (648/1700MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC898, Network: Intel 82579V Gigabit Connection OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-17-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 5.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 295.20, OpenGL: 4.2.0 NVIDIA 295.20, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 CLOMP 3.3 Static OMP Speedup Speedup > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ............. 3.27 |=================================================== i5 2400 ............. 3.25 |=================================================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 0.36 |====== i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 3.28 |=================================================== Timed Apache Compilation 2.2.17 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better i5 2400 ............. 29.30 |======================================= phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 37.81 |================================================== i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 17.28 |======================= BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 LPS > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ............. 22778420.20 |================================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 17650950.77 |========================== i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 29798132.73 |============================================ 7-Zip Compression 9.13 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better 2011-11-04 02:14 .... 11795 |=========================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 8869 |==================== i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 22211 |================================================== LAME MP3 Encoding 3.98.2 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better i5 2400 ............. 21.00 |==================================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 29.07 |================================================== i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 15.96 |=========================== John The Ripper 1.7.8 Test: Traditional DES Real C/S > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ............. 4279333 |====================================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 2430333 |====================== i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 5394000 |================================================ John The Ripper 1.7.8 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ............. 13004 |====================================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 14989 |============================================ i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 17223 |================================================== John The Ripper 1.7.8 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ............. 814 |===================================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 988 |============================================= i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 1112 |=================================================== FFmpeg 0.8.2 AVI To NTSC VCD Seconds < Lower Is Better i5 2400 ............. 14.98 |================================================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 12.69 |========================================== i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 7.43 |========================= Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.0.5 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better i5 2400 ............. 11.72 |============================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 19.56 |================================================== i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 6.80 |================= FLAC Audio Encoding 1.2.1 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better i5 2400 ............. 6.80 |========================================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 8.20 |=================================================== i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 5.04 |=============================== OpenSSL 1.0.0a RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ............. 79.10 |===================================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 62.30 |============================= i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 104.73 |================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: BT.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ............. 10746.09 |===================================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 4993.07 |================= i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 13776.66 |=============================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: CG.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ............. 2264.39 |================================================ phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 1425.65 |============================== i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 2264.91 |================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: EP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ............. 126.92 |======================= phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 92.26 |================= i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 273.96 |================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: FT.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ............. 5617.62 |================================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 3888.09 |======================== i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 7898.77 |================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: IS.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ............. 167.92 |====================================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 82.99 |=================== i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 214.95 |================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: LU.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ............. 8978.98 |================================= phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 4713.26 |================== i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 12649.04 |=============================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: MG.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ............. 5583.22 |=================================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 2823.83 |================== i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 7559.17 |================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: SP.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ............. 5396.22 |====================================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 2658.21 |=================== i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 6831.91 |================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: UA.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ............. 33.66 |====================================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 21.77 |========================= i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 43.85 |================================================== Stream 2009-04-11 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ............. 12797.65 |========================= phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 8063.79 |================ i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 24207.52 |=============================================== Stream 2009-04-11 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ............. 12503.41 |========================= phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 7902.34 |================ i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 23412.23 |=============================================== Stream 2009-04-11 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ............. 13708.78 |========================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 8577.86 |================ i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 25240.06 |=============================================== Stream 2009-04-11 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better i5 2400 ............. 13930.72 |========================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 8658.77 |================ i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 25580.67 |=============================================== Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.706 Multiple Sequence Alignment Seconds < Lower Is Better i5 2400 ............. 21.54 |===================================== phenom 2 vs i5 2400 . 29.35 |================================================== i7 3820 4.3 oc ...... 16.10 |=========================== Crafty 23.3 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better i5 2400 . 362.80 |=============================================================