OMAP4660 Ubuntu 12.04 vs. Core Duo Phoronix benchmarks of the OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS ARMv7 hard-float snapshot from late January where cpufreq is properly supported in its Linux 3.2 kernel for maximum performance of 1.2GHz for dual-core ARM Cortex-A9 processor. Compared to some other x86 systems using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS snapshot for future article on Phoronix.com with testing and article by Michael Larabel. OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES: Processor: ARMv7 rev 10 @ 1.20GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: OMAP4 Panda board, Memory: 912MB, Disk: 16GB SD16G, Graphics: Texas Instruments OMAP OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-1405-omap4 (armv7l), Desktop: Unity 2D, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: fbdev 0.4.2, OpenGL: 2.1 Mesa 7.11, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 Core Duo T2400: Processor: Intel T2400 @ 1.83GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: LENOVO 2613EJU, Chipset: Intel Mobile 945GM/PM/GMS + ICH7-M, Memory: 1024MB, Disk: 80GB Hitachi HTS541080G9SA00, Graphics: ATI Radeon Mobility X1400 128MB, Audio: Analog Devices AD1981, Network: Intel 82573L Gigabit + Intel PRO/Wireless OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-11-generic-pae (i686), Desktop: Unity, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: radeon 6.14.99, OpenGL: 2.1 Mesa 7.11 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1400x1050 Apache Benchmark 2.2.17 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 1362.55 |======== Core Duo T2400 ......... 7282.77 |============================================= BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 LPS > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 3331152.20 |======================= Core Duo T2400 ......... 6116013.13 |========================================== CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 1746.17 |============================================= Core Duo T2400 ......... 1733.47 |============================================= CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 2342.55 |======================= Core Duo T2400 ......... 4581.74 |============================================= CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 2449.28 |============ Core Duo T2400 ......... 9075.99 |============================================= C-Ray 1.1 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 1141.85 |============================================= Core Duo T2400 ......... 563.21 |====================== CLOMP 3.3 Static OMP Speedup Speedup > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 2.09 |================================================ 7-Zip Compression 9.20.1 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 871 |================== Core Duo T2400 ......... 2284 |================================================ Ogg Encoding 1.2.0 WAV To Ogg Seconds < Lower Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 74.20 |=============================================== Core Duo T2400 ......... 32.40 |===================== LAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 107.28 |============================================== Core Duo T2400 ......... 45.34 |=================== FFmpeg 0.8.7 AVI To NTSC VCD Seconds < Lower Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 199.70 |============================================== Core Duo T2400 ......... 32.96 |======== GraphicsMagick 1.3.12 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 27 |==================================== Core Duo T2400 ......... 38 |================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.12 Operation: Blur Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 13 |====================== Core Duo T2400 ......... 29 |================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.12 Operation: Local Adaptive Thresholding Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 5 |===================== Core Duo T2400 ......... 12 |================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.12 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 18 |========================= Core Duo T2400 ......... 36 |================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.12 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 8 |====================== Core Duo T2400 ......... 18 |================================================== Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.864 Multiple Sequence Alignment Seconds < Lower Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 149.28 |============================================== Core Duo T2400 ......... 62.45 |=================== N-Queens 1.0 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 825.54 |============================================== Core Duo T2400 ......... 542.23 |============================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: BT.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 411.02 |========== Core Duo T2400 ......... 1786.83 |============================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: CG.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 45.74 |===== Core Duo T2400 ......... 465.05 |============================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: EP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 9.37 |==================== Core Duo T2400 ......... 21.54 |=============================================== OpenSSL 1.0.0e RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 4.60 |============================ Core Duo T2400 ......... 7.90 |================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 101.22 |================ Core Duo T2400 ......... 289.80 |============================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 17.50 |================== Core Duo T2400 ......... 44.75 |=============================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 201.17 |================= Core Duo T2400 ......... 560.49 |============================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 76.98 |============================ Core Duo T2400 ......... 124.42 |============================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 100.70 |============= Core Duo T2400 ......... 355.56 |============================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 109.74 |============== Core Duo T2400 ......... 363.81 |============================================== Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 2714 |================================================ Core Duo T2400 ......... 887 |================ TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 73175 |================== Core Duo T2400 ......... 190845 |============================================== VP8 libvpx Encoding 0.9.7-p1 vpxenc Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 1.01 |============ Core Duo T2400 ......... 4.12 |================================================ x264 2011-12-06 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES . 4.04 |============== Core Duo T2400 ......... 13.40 |===============================================