OMAP4660 Ubuntu 12.04 vs. Core Duo

Phoronix benchmarks of the OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS ARMv7 hard-float snapshot from late January where cpufreq is properly supported in its Linux 3.2 kernel for maximum performance of 1.2GHz for dual-core ARM Cortex-A9 processor. Compared to some other x86 systems using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS snapshot for future article on Phoronix.com with testing and article by Michael Larabel.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1201287-BY-PANDALINU96
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Audio Encoding 2 Tests
Chess Test Suite 2 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 12 Tests
CPU Massive 12 Tests
Creator Workloads 8 Tests
Encoding 5 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 2 Tests
Common Kernel Benchmarks 2 Tests
Multi-Core 9 Tests
Renderers 2 Tests
Server 2 Tests
Server CPU Tests 5 Tests
Single-Threaded 5 Tests
Video Encoding 3 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES
January 26 2012
 
Core Duo T2400
January 28 2012
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES

Processor: ARMv7 rev 10 @ 1.20GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: OMAP4 Panda board, Memory: 912MB, Disk: 16GB SD16G, Graphics: Texas Instruments OMAP

OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-1405-omap4 (armv7l), Desktop: Unity 2D, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: fbdev 0.4.2, OpenGL: 2.1 Mesa 7.11, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768

Core Duo T2400

Processor: Intel T2400 @ 1.83GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: LENOVO 2613EJU, Chipset: Intel Mobile 945GM/PM/GMS + ICH7-M, Memory: 1024MB, Disk: 80GB Hitachi HTS541080G9SA00, Graphics: ATI Radeon Mobility X1400 128MB, Audio: Analog Devices AD1981, Network: Intel 82573L Gigabit + Intel PRO/Wireless

OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-11-generic-pae (i686), Desktop: Unity, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: radeon 6.14.99, OpenGL: 2.1 Mesa 7.11 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1400x1050

System Notes: Compiz was running on this system.

OMAP4660 Ubuntu 12.04 vs. Core DuoProcessorMotherboardMemoryDiskGraphicsChipsetAudioNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400ARMv7 rev 10 @ 1.20GHz (2 Cores)OMAP4 Panda board912MB16GB SD16GTexas Instruments OMAPUbuntu 12.043.2.0-1405-omap4 (armv7l)Unity 2DX Server 1.11.3fbdev 0.4.22.1 Mesa 7.11GCC 4.6ext41024x768Intel T2400 @ 1.83GHz (2 Cores)LENOVO 2613EJUIntel Mobile 945GM/PM/GMS + ICH7-M1024MB80GB Hitachi HTS541080G9SA00ATI Radeon Mobility X1400 128MBAnalog Devices AD1981Intel 82573L Gigabit + Intel PRO/Wireless3.2.0-11-generic-pae (i686)Unityradeon 6.14.992.1 Mesa 7.11 Gallium 0.41400x1050OpenBenchmarking.orgSystem Details- Core Duo T2400: Compiz was running on this system.

OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES vs. Core Duo T2400 ComparisonPhoronix Test SuiteBaseline+229.2%+229.2%+458.4%+458.4%+687.6%+687.6%505.9%434.5%334.7%307.9%270.6%253.1%231.7%231.5%206%186.3%178.6%162.2%160.8%155.7%140%139%136.6%129.9%129%125%123.1%102.7%100%916.7%95.6%83.6%71.7%61.6%52.2%40.7%AVI To NTSC VCDS.W.P.SBT.AvpxencR.M.WS.M.MH.2.V.ED.L.M.FG.I.R.1.SCompositeJ.S.O.RC.S.TA.C.PF.F.TL.A.TM.S.AWAV To MP3EP.BWAV To OggSharpenBlurTotal TimeResizingCG.BWriteDhrystone 2R.4.b.PMonte CarloElapsed TimeHWB Color SpaceFFmpegApache BenchmarkNAS Parallel BenchmarksVP8 libvpx EncodingCacheBenchSciMarkx264SciMarkSmallptSciMarkSciMark7-Zip CompressionTSCPSciMarkGraphicsMagickTimed MAFFT AlignmentLAME MP3 EncodingNAS Parallel BenchmarksOgg EncodingGraphicsMagickGraphicsMagickC-RayGraphicsMagickNAS Parallel BenchmarksCacheBenchBYTE Unix BenchmarkOpenSSLSciMarkN-QueensGraphicsMagickOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400

OMAP4660 Ubuntu 12.04 vs. Core Duoapache: Static Web Page Servingbyte: Dhrystone 2cachebench: Readcachebench: Writecachebench: Read / Modify / Writec-ray: Total Timeclomp: Static OMP Speedupcompress-7zip: Compress Speed Testencode-ogg: WAV To Oggencode-mp3: WAV To MP3ffmpeg: AVI To NTSC VCDgraphics-magick: HWB Color Spacegraphics-magick: Blurgraphics-magick: Local Adaptive Thresholdinggraphics-magick: Resizinggraphics-magick: Sharpenmafft: Multiple Sequence Alignmentn-queens: Elapsed Timenpb: BT.Anpb: CG.Bnpb: EP.Bopenssl: RSA 4096-bit Performancescimark2: Compositescimark2: Fast Fourier Transformscimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxationscimark2: Monte Carloscimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiplyscimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorizationsmallpt: Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samplestscp: AI Chess Performancevpxenc: vpxencx264: H.264 Video EncodingOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T24001362.553331152.201746.172342.552449.281141.852.0987174.20107.28199.7027135188149.28825.54411.0245.749.374.60101.2217.50201.1776.98100.70109.742714731751.014.047282.776116013.131733.474581.749075.99563.21228432.4045.3432.96382912361862.45542.231786.83465.0521.547.90289.8044.75560.49124.42355.56363.818871908454.1213.40OpenBenchmarking.org

Apache Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterApache Benchmark 2.2.17Static Web Page ServingOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T240016003200480064008000SE +/- 3.74, N = 3SE +/- 92.08, N = 31362.557282.77
OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterApache Benchmark 2.2.17Static Web Page ServingOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T240013002600390052006500Min: 1355.07 / Avg: 1362.55 / Max: 1366.66Min: 7098.8 / Avg: 7282.77 / Max: 7381.87

BYTE Unix Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgLPS, More Is BetterBYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6Computational Test: Dhrystone 2OMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T24001.3M2.6M3.9M5.2M6.5MSE +/- 15888.26, N = 3SE +/- 12877.96, N = 33331152.206116013.13
OpenBenchmarking.orgLPS, More Is BetterBYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6Computational Test: Dhrystone 2OMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T24001.1M2.2M3.3M4.4M5.5MMin: 3306502.3 / Avg: 3331152.2 / Max: 3360843.7Min: 6094186.4 / Avg: 6116013.13 / Max: 6138768

CacheBench

This is a performance test of CacheBench, which is part of LLCbench. CacheBench is designed to test the memory and cache bandwidth performance Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCacheBenchTest: ReadOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400400800120016002000SE +/- 1.98, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 31746.171733.47
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCacheBenchTest: ReadOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T240030060090012001500Min: 1742.22 / Avg: 1746.17 / Max: 1748.14Min: 1733.33 / Avg: 1733.47 / Max: 1733.58

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCacheBenchTest: WriteOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T240010002000300040005000SE +/- 50.10, N = 6SE +/- 6.21, N = 32342.554581.74
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCacheBenchTest: WriteOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T24008001600240032004000Min: 2178.9 / Avg: 2342.55 / Max: 2443.48Min: 4574.45 / Avg: 4581.74 / Max: 4594.09

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCacheBenchTest: Read / Modify / WriteOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T24002K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 36.77, N = 4SE +/- 9.79, N = 32449.289075.99
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCacheBenchTest: Read / Modify / WriteOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T240016003200480064008000Min: 2368.74 / Avg: 2449.28 / Max: 2541.12Min: 9065.93 / Avg: 9075.99 / Max: 9095.56

C-Ray

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterC-Ray 1.1Total TimeOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T24002004006008001000SE +/- 0.32, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 31141.85563.21
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterC-Ray 1.1Total TimeOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T24002004006008001000Min: 1141.23 / Avg: 1141.85 / Max: 1142.32Min: 563.13 / Avg: 563.21 / Max: 563.32

CLOMP

CLOMP is the C version of the Livermore OpenMP benchmark developed to measure OpenMP overheads and other performance impacts due to threading in order to influence future system designs. This particular test profile configuration is currently set to look at the OpenMP static schedule speed-up across all available CPU cores using the recommended test configuration. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSpeedup, More Is BetterCLOMP 3.3Static OMP SpeedupOMAP4660 PandaBoard ES0.47030.94061.41091.88122.3515SE +/- 0.04, N = 102.09

7-Zip Compression

OpenBenchmarking.orgMIPS, More Is Better7-Zip Compression 9.20.1Compress Speed TestOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T24005001000150020002500SE +/- 9.64, N = 3SE +/- 8.01, N = 38712284
OpenBenchmarking.orgMIPS, More Is Better7-Zip Compression 9.20.1Compress Speed TestOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400400800120016002000Min: 856 / Avg: 871 / Max: 889Min: 2272 / Avg: 2283.67 / Max: 2299

Ogg Encoding

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterOgg Encoding 1.2.0WAV To OggOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T24001632486480SE +/- 1.10, N = 10SE +/- 0.05, N = 574.2032.40
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterOgg Encoding 1.2.0WAV To OggOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T24001428425670Min: 71.47 / Avg: 74.2 / Max: 83.29Min: 32.35 / Avg: 32.4 / Max: 32.59

LAME MP3 Encoding

LAME is an MP3 encoder licensed under the LGPL. This test measures the time required to encode a WAV file to MP3 format. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterLAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3WAV To MP3OMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T240020406080100SE +/- 0.12, N = 5SE +/- 0.01, N = 5107.2845.34
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterLAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3WAV To MP3OMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T240020406080100Min: 106.88 / Avg: 107.28 / Max: 107.59Min: 45.31 / Avg: 45.34 / Max: 45.39

FFmpeg

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterFFmpeg 0.8.7AVI To NTSC VCDOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T24004080120160200SE +/- 3.40, N = 6SE +/- 0.24, N = 3199.7032.96
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterFFmpeg 0.8.7AVI To NTSC VCDOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T24004080120160200Min: 192.01 / Avg: 199.7 / Max: 215.01Min: 32.58 / Avg: 32.96 / Max: 33.4

GraphicsMagick

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.12Operation: HWB Color SpaceOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400918273645SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 32738
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.12Operation: HWB Color SpaceOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400816243240Min: 26 / Avg: 26.67 / Max: 27Min: 38 / Avg: 38 / Max: 38

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.12Operation: BlurOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400714212835SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 31329
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.12Operation: BlurOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400612182430Min: 13 / Avg: 13 / Max: 13Min: 29 / Avg: 29 / Max: 29

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.12Operation: Local Adaptive ThresholdingOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T24003691215SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3512
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.12Operation: Local Adaptive ThresholdingOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T24003691215Min: 5 / Avg: 5 / Max: 5Min: 12 / Avg: 12 / Max: 12

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.12Operation: ResizingOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400816243240SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 31836
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.12Operation: ResizingOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400816243240Min: 18 / Avg: 18 / Max: 18Min: 36 / Avg: 36 / Max: 36

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.12Operation: SharpenOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T240048121620SE +/- 0.42, N = 6SE +/- 0.00, N = 3818
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.12Operation: SharpenOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400510152025Min: 7 / Avg: 8.33 / Max: 9Min: 18 / Avg: 18 / Max: 18

Timed MAFFT Alignment

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed MAFFT Alignment 6.864Multiple Sequence AlignmentOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400306090120150SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 3149.2862.45
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed MAFFT Alignment 6.864Multiple Sequence AlignmentOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400306090120150Min: 149.02 / Avg: 149.28 / Max: 149.46Min: 62.25 / Avg: 62.45 / Max: 62.83

N-Queens

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterN-Queens 1.0Elapsed TimeOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T24002004006008001000SE +/- 0.01, N = 2SE +/- 0.27, N = 2825.54542.23
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterN-Queens 1.0Elapsed TimeOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400150300450600750Min: 825.54 / Avg: 825.54 / Max: 825.55Min: 541.96 / Avg: 542.23 / Max: 542.51

NAS Parallel Benchmarks

OpenBenchmarking.orgTotal Mop/s, More Is BetterNAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3Test / Class: BT.AOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400400800120016002000SE +/- 0.41, N = 3SE +/- 2.16, N = 3411.021786.83
OpenBenchmarking.orgTotal Mop/s, More Is BetterNAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3Test / Class: BT.AOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T240030060090012001500Min: 410.23 / Avg: 411.02 / Max: 411.6Min: 1782.74 / Avg: 1786.83 / Max: 1790.08

OpenBenchmarking.orgTotal Mop/s, More Is BetterNAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3Test / Class: CG.BOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400100200300400500SE +/- 0.68, N = 3SE +/- 11.48, N = 645.74465.05
OpenBenchmarking.orgTotal Mop/s, More Is BetterNAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3Test / Class: CG.BOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T240080160240320400Min: 44.66 / Avg: 45.74 / Max: 47Min: 438.38 / Avg: 465.05 / Max: 506.22

OpenBenchmarking.orgTotal Mop/s, More Is BetterNAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3Test / Class: EP.BOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400510152025SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 39.3721.54
OpenBenchmarking.orgTotal Mop/s, More Is BetterNAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3Test / Class: EP.BOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400510152025Min: 9.37 / Avg: 9.37 / Max: 9.37Min: 21.54 / Avg: 21.54 / Max: 21.54

OpenSSL

OpenBenchmarking.orgSigns Per Second, More Is BetterOpenSSL 1.0.0eRSA 4096-bit PerformanceOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400246810SE +/- 0.00, N = 4SE +/- 0.00, N = 44.607.90
OpenBenchmarking.orgSigns Per Second, More Is BetterOpenSSL 1.0.0eRSA 4096-bit PerformanceOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T24003691215Min: 4.6 / Avg: 4.6 / Max: 4.6Min: 7.9 / Avg: 7.9 / Max: 7.9

SciMark

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: CompositeOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T240060120180240300SE +/- 0.15, N = 4SE +/- 0.10, N = 4101.22289.80
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: CompositeOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T240050100150200250Min: 100.86 / Avg: 101.22 / Max: 101.51Min: 289.62 / Avg: 289.8 / Max: 290.04

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Fast Fourier TransformOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T24001020304050SE +/- 0.04, N = 4SE +/- 0.08, N = 417.5044.75
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Fast Fourier TransformOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400918273645Min: 17.42 / Avg: 17.5 / Max: 17.62Min: 44.56 / Avg: 44.75 / Max: 44.94

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-RelaxationOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400120240360480600SE +/- 0.37, N = 4SE +/- 0.59, N = 4201.17560.49
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-RelaxationOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400100200300400500Min: 200.12 / Avg: 201.17 / Max: 201.7Min: 559.46 / Avg: 560.49 / Max: 561.51

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Monte CarloOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400306090120150SE +/- 0.23, N = 4SE +/- 0.14, N = 476.98124.42
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Monte CarloOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T240020406080100Min: 76.48 / Avg: 76.98 / Max: 77.58Min: 124.28 / Avg: 124.42 / Max: 124.85

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Sparse Matrix MultiplyOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T240080160240320400SE +/- 0.57, N = 4SE +/- 0.00, N = 4100.70355.56
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Sparse Matrix MultiplyOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T240060120180240300Min: 99.22 / Avg: 100.7 / Max: 101.99Min: 355.56 / Avg: 355.56 / Max: 355.56

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix FactorizationOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T240080160240320400SE +/- 0.17, N = 4SE +/- 0.29, N = 4109.74363.81
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix FactorizationOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T240060120180240300Min: 109.47 / Avg: 109.74 / Max: 110.19Min: 363.31 / Avg: 363.81 / Max: 364.3

Smallpt

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSmallpt 1.0Global Illumination Renderer; 100 SamplesOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T24006001200180024003000SE +/- 12.00, N = 3SE +/- 7.67, N = 32714887
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSmallpt 1.0Global Illumination Renderer; 100 SamplesOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T24005001000150020002500Min: 2699 / Avg: 2714.33 / Max: 2738Min: 879 / Avg: 886.67 / Max: 902

TSCP

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterTSCP 1.81AI Chess PerformanceOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T240040K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 61.92, N = 5SE +/- 138.68, N = 573175190845
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterTSCP 1.81AI Chess PerformanceOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T240030K60K90K120K150KMin: 73076 / Avg: 73175.2 / Max: 73417Min: 190448 / Avg: 190844.6 / Max: 191109

VP8 libvpx Encoding

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterVP8 libvpx Encoding 0.9.7-p1vpxencOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T24000.9271.8542.7813.7084.635SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 31.014.12
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterVP8 libvpx Encoding 0.9.7-p1vpxencOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T2400246810Min: 1.01 / Avg: 1.01 / Max: 1.01Min: 4.08 / Avg: 4.12 / Max: 4.15

x264

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterx264 2011-12-06H.264 Video EncodingOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T24003691215SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 34.0413.40
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterx264 2011-12-06H.264 Video EncodingOMAP4660 PandaBoard ESCore Duo T240048121620Min: 3.97 / Avg: 4.04 / Max: 4.14Min: 13.15 / Avg: 13.4 / Max: 13.59

OMAP4660 PandaBoard ES

Processor: ARMv7 rev 10 @ 1.20GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: OMAP4 Panda board, Memory: 912MB, Disk: 16GB SD16G, Graphics: Texas Instruments OMAP

OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-1405-omap4 (armv7l), Desktop: Unity 2D, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: fbdev 0.4.2, OpenGL: 2.1 Mesa 7.11, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768

Testing initiated at 26 January 2012 21:06 by user phoronix.

Core Duo T2400

Processor: Intel T2400 @ 1.83GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: LENOVO 2613EJU, Chipset: Intel Mobile 945GM/PM/GMS + ICH7-M, Memory: 1024MB, Disk: 80GB Hitachi HTS541080G9SA00, Graphics: ATI Radeon Mobility X1400 128MB, Audio: Analog Devices AD1981, Network: Intel 82573L Gigabit + Intel PRO/Wireless

OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-11-generic-pae (i686), Desktop: Unity, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: radeon 6.14.99, OpenGL: 2.1 Mesa 7.11 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1400x1050

System Notes: Compiz was running on this system.

Testing initiated at 28 January 2012 13:07 by user phoronix.