AMD Bulldozer Core Scaling Seeing how well the AMD Bulldozer FX-8150 scales under Linux when controlling the core count from the BIOS/UEFI of the ASUS Crosshair V Formula motherboard. Using Linux 3.1 kernel and multi-threaded tests. To be compared to other Intel CPUs for a future article on Phoronix.com.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1110198-AR-AMDBULLDO28 .
Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server Display Driver OpenGL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution AMD FX-8150 1 Core 2 Cores 4 Cores 6 Cores 8 Cores AMD FX-8150 Eight-Core @ 3.61GHz (1 Core) ASUS Crosshair V Formula ATI RD890 PCI to PCI bridge 8192MB 60GB OCZ VERTEX2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB (675/1800MHz) Realtek ALC889 Intel 82583V Gigabit Connection Ubuntu 11.10 3.1.0-rc10-ic-aliasing-patch+ (x86_64) Unity 4.22.0 X Server 1.10.4 NVIDIA 285.05.09 4.2.0 NVIDIA 285.05.09 GCC 4.6.1 ext4 1920x1080 AMD FX-8150 Eight-Core @ 3.61GHz (2 Cores) AMD FX-8150 Eight-Core @ 3.61GHz (4 Cores) AMD FX-8150 Eight-Core @ 3.61GHz (6 Cores) AMD FX-8150 Eight-Core @ 3.61GHz (8 Cores) OpenBenchmarking.org System Details - Compiz was running on this system.
c-ray: Total Time smallpt: Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples graphics-magick: Local Adaptive Thresholding graphics-magick: Sharpen compress-7zip: Compress Speed Test x264: H.264 Video Encoding npb: BT.A npb: EP.B npb: FT.B npb: LU.A npb: UA.A clomp: Static OMP Speedup AMD FX-8150 1 Core 2 Cores 4 Cores 6 Cores 8 Cores 307.23 774 16 13 3299 21.02 2168.80 23.14 1474.15 2241.16 7.62 0.98 188.20 389 29 23 4896 27.93 3558.54 43.61 2110.58 3512.92 12.71 1.57 94.13 191 47 40 9378 54.26 6647.93 87.17 4126.73 6969.12 23.33 2.53 63.08 128 61 55 14272 81.87 9305.96 130.96 5629.39 9626.71 32.50 2.58 51.34 104 68 65 17963 102.25 11208.12 162.66 6573.27 11702.03 38.56 2.46 OpenBenchmarking.org
C-Ray Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better C-Ray 1.1 Total Time 1 Core 2 Cores 4 Cores 6 Cores 8 Cores 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.61, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 307.23 188.20 94.13 63.08 51.34
Smallpt Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples 1 Core 2 Cores 4 Cores 6 Cores 8 Cores 170 340 510 680 850 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 6.59, N = 4 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 774 389 191 128 104
GraphicsMagick Operation: Local Adaptive Thresholding OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.12 Operation: Local Adaptive Thresholding 1 Core 2 Cores 4 Cores 6 Cores 8 Cores 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 16 29 47 61 68
GraphicsMagick Operation: Sharpen OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.12 Operation: Sharpen 1 Core 2 Cores 4 Cores 6 Cores 8 Cores 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 13 23 40 55 65
7-Zip Compression Compress Speed Test OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 9.13 Compress Speed Test 1 Core 2 Cores 4 Cores 6 Cores 8 Cores 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 4.10, N = 3 SE +/- 26.74, N = 3 SE +/- 29.08, N = 3 SE +/- 132.87, N = 3 SE +/- 81.72, N = 3 3299 4896 9378 14272 17963
x264 H.264 Video Encoding OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better x264 2010-11-22 H.264 Video Encoding 1 Core 2 Cores 4 Cores 6 Cores 8 Cores 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 SE +/- 0.69, N = 3 21.02 27.93 54.26 81.87 102.25
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: BT.A OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: BT.A 1 Core 2 Cores 4 Cores 6 Cores 8 Cores 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 1.51, N = 3 SE +/- 2.96, N = 3 SE +/- 10.33, N = 3 SE +/- 18.45, N = 3 SE +/- 11.62, N = 3 2168.80 3558.54 6647.93 9305.96 11208.12
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.B OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: EP.B 1 Core 2 Cores 4 Cores 6 Cores 8 Cores 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.60, N = 3 23.14 43.61 87.17 130.96 162.66
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: FT.B OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: FT.B 1 Core 2 Cores 4 Cores 6 Cores 8 Cores 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 2.87, N = 3 SE +/- 24.68, N = 3 SE +/- 23.06, N = 3 SE +/- 41.04, N = 3 SE +/- 36.57, N = 3 1474.15 2110.58 4126.73 5629.39 6573.27
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: LU.A OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: LU.A 1 Core 2 Cores 4 Cores 6 Cores 8 Cores 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 4.51, N = 3 SE +/- 15.32, N = 3 SE +/- 22.67, N = 3 SE +/- 45.57, N = 3 SE +/- 30.06, N = 3 2241.16 3512.92 6969.12 9626.71 11702.03
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: UA.A OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: UA.A 1 Core 2 Cores 4 Cores 6 Cores 8 Cores 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 7.62 12.71 23.33 32.50 38.56
CLOMP Static OMP Speedup OpenBenchmarking.org Speedup, More Is Better CLOMP 3.3 Static OMP Speedup 1 Core 2 Cores 4 Cores 6 Cores 8 Cores 0.5805 1.161 1.7415 2.322 2.9025 SE +/- 0.00, N = 5 SE +/- 0.00, N = 5 SE +/- 0.02, N = 5 SE +/- 0.02, N = 5 SE +/- 0.02, N = 5 0.98 1.57 2.53 2.58 2.46
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4