pts-java

Intel Core 2 Duo testing with a Apple MacBook Pro and NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT 256MB on Mac OS X 10.7.1 (11B26) via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1109250-LI-PTSJAVA0289
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
DLH
September 25 2011
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


pts-javaOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Core 2 Duo @ 2.40GHz (2 Cores)Apple MacBook ProIntel ICH8-M2 GB + 4 GB DDR2-667MHz500GB WDC WD5000BEVT-22A0RT0NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT 256MBColor LCDMac OS X 10.7.1 (11B26)11.1.0 (x86_64)X Server 1.10.2NVIDIA2.1GCC 4.2.1 + Clang 4.2.1Journaled HFS+1440x900ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsMonitorOSKernelDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionPts-java BenchmarksSystem Logs- Java SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_26-b03-383-11A511).

pts-javajava-scimark2: Compositejava-scimark2: Fast Fourier Transformjava-scimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxationjava-scimark2: Monte Carlojava-scimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiplyjava-scimark2: Dense LU Matrix FactorizationDLH804.50468.71944.50402.74777.241429.33OpenBenchmarking.org

Java SciMark

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: CompositeDLH2004006008001000SE +/- 2.38, N = 4804.50

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Fast Fourier TransformDLH100200300400500SE +/- 2.67, N = 4468.71

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-RelaxationDLH2004006008001000SE +/- 2.88, N = 4944.50

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Monte CarloDLH90180270360450SE +/- 1.74, N = 4402.74

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Sparse Matrix MultiplyDLH2004006008001000SE +/- 0.50, N = 4777.24

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix FactorizationDLH30060090012001500SE +/- 15.32, N = 41429.33