Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1108308-ASVA-RAIDTES36
raid_test_2
RAid setup testing
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies:
Processor: AMD E-350 @ 1.60GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS E35M1-I DELUXE, Chipset: AMD Device 1510, Memory: 3584MB, Disk: 4 x 2000GB Western Digital WDC WD20EARS-00M, Graphics: ATI Device 9802, Audio: ATI R6xx HDMI
OS: Linux, Kernel: 2.6.32-5-amd64 (x86_64), Display Driver: ati, Compiler: GCC 4.4.5, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD:
Processor: AMD E-350 @ 1.60GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS E35M1-I DELUXE, Chipset: AMD Device 1510, Memory: 3584MB, Disk: 4 x 2000GB Western Digital WDC WD20EARS-00M, Graphics: ATI Device 9802, Audio: ATI R6xx HDMI
OS: Linux, Kernel: 2.6.32-5-amd64 (x86_64), Display Driver: ati, Compiler: GCC 4.4.5, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
Test: Read - Size Per Thread: 256MB - Thread Count: 4
MB/s > Higher Is Better
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies ............. 2199.08 |=========================
level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD . 1871.33 |=====================
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
Test: Random Read - Size Per Thread: 256MB - Thread Count: 4
MB/s > Higher Is Better
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies ............. 1768.00 |=========================
level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD . 1616.25 |=======================
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 256MB - Thread Count: 4
MB/s > Higher Is Better
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies ............. 142.17 |==========================
level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD . 19.14 |====
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
Test: Random Write - Size Per Thread: 256MB - Thread Count: 4
MB/s > Higher Is Better
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies ............. 1.00 |============================
level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD . 0.65 |==================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies ............. 38.37 |===========================
level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD . 16.73 |============
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync
Files/s > Higher Is Better
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies ............. 280.23 |==========================
level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD . 78.17 |=======
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads
Files/s > Higher Is Better
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies ............. 68.83 |===========================
level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD . 24.57 |==========
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies ............. 33.13 |===========================
level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD . 17.00 |==============
IOzone 3.347
Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies ............. 210.60 |==========================
level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD . 55.52 |=======
IOzone 3.347
Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies ............. 184.69 |=======================
level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD . 209.19 |==========================
AIO-Stress 0.21
Test: Random Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies ............. 18.48 |===========================
level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD . 11.92 |=================