Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1108300-ASVA-RAIDTES84
raid_test_2
RAid setup testing
512K chunks 2 near-copies:
Processor: AMD E-350 @ 1.60GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS E35M1-I DELUXE, Chipset: AMD Device 1510, Memory: 3584MB, Disk: 4 x 2000GB Western Digital WDC WD20EARS-00M, Graphics: ATI Device 9802, Audio: ATI R6xx HDMI
OS: Linux, Kernel: 2.6.32-5-amd64 (x86_64), Display Driver: ati, Compiler: GCC 4.4.5, File-System: ext4
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies:
Processor: AMD E-350 @ 1.60GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS E35M1-I DELUXE, Chipset: AMD Device 1510, Memory: 3584MB, Disk: 4 x 2000GB Western Digital WDC WD20EARS-00M, Graphics: ATI Device 9802, Audio: ATI R6xx HDMI
OS: Linux, Kernel: 2.6.32-5-amd64 (x86_64), Display Driver: ati, Compiler: GCC 4.4.5, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
Test: Random Read - Size Per Thread: 256MB - Thread Count: 4
MB/s > Higher Is Better
512K chunks 2 near-copies ...... 1700.44 |====================================
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies . 1768.00 |=====================================
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
Test: Read - Size Per Thread: 256MB - Thread Count: 4
MB/s > Higher Is Better
512K chunks 2 near-copies ...... 2133.89 |====================================
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies . 2199.08 |=====================================
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
Test: Random Write - Size Per Thread: 256MB - Thread Count: 4
MB/s > Higher Is Better
512K chunks 2 near-copies ...... 0.93 |=====================================
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies . 1.00 |========================================
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 256MB - Thread Count: 4
MB/s > Higher Is Better
512K chunks 2 near-copies ...... 141.15 |======================================
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies . 142.17 |======================================
IOzone 3.347
Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
512K chunks 2 near-copies ...... 166.88 |==================================
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies . 184.69 |======================================
IOzone 3.347
Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
512K chunks 2 near-copies ...... 187.01 |==================================
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies . 210.60 |======================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
512K chunks 2 near-copies ...... 30.23 |====================================
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies . 33.13 |=======================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads
Files/s > Higher Is Better
512K chunks 2 near-copies ...... 63.37 |====================================
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies . 68.83 |=======================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync
Files/s > Higher Is Better
512K chunks 2 near-copies ...... 271.60 |=====================================
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies . 280.23 |======================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
512K chunks 2 near-copies ...... 32.07 |=================================
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies . 38.37 |=======================================
Flexible IO Tester 1.57
Test: Example Network Job
Seconds (Run Time) < Lower Is Better
512K chunks 2 near-copies . 26.32 |============================================
Flexible IO Tester 1.57
Test: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern
Seconds (Run Time) < Lower Is Better
512K chunks 2 near-copies . 3702.76 |==========================================
AIO-Stress 0.21
Test: Random Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
512K chunks 2 near-copies ...... 17.16 |====================================
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies . 18.48 |=======================================