Competition between my computers.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1108195-GR-COMPUTING32
computing_science
Competition between my computers.
2nd_desktop:
Processor: Intel Celeron 2.40GHz @ 2.39GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: American Megatrends P1.30, Chipset: VIA PT880, Memory: 1536MB, Disk: 80GB SAMSUNG SP0842N, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 128MB (250/400MHz)
OS: Ubuntu 11.04, Kernel: 2.6.38-10-generic (i686), Desktop: GNOME 2.32.1, Display Server: X Server 1.10.1, Display Driver: NVIDIA 173.14.30, OpenGL: 2.1.2 NVIDIA 173.14.30, Compiler: GCC 4.5.2, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050
3rd_desktop:
Processor: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.33GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte EP45T-UD3R, Chipset: Intel 4 + ICH10R, Memory: 4096MB, Disk: 500GB Hitachi HDP72505, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT 1024MB (650/400MHz)
OS: LinuxMint 11, Kernel: 2.6.38-8-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME 2.32.1, Display Server: X Server 1.10.1, Display Driver: NVIDIA 270.41.06, OpenGL: 3.3.0 NVIDIA 270.41.06, Compiler: GCC 4.5.2, File-System: ext2/ext3, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050
Himeno Benchmark 3.0
Poisson Pressure Solver
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
2nd_desktop . 90.37 |=================================
3rd_desktop . 156.60 |=========================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: BT.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2nd_desktop . 709.97 |=======
3rd_desktop . 5648.04 |========================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: CG.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2nd_desktop . 34.78 |=
3rd_desktop . 1320.58 |========================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: EP.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2nd_desktop . 7.20 |=====
3rd_desktop . 81.65 |==========================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: FT.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2nd_desktop . 162.19 |===
3rd_desktop . 2614.07 |========================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: IS.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2nd_desktop . 21.26 |=================
3rd_desktop . 73.29 |==========================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: LU.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2nd_desktop . 436.85 |======
3rd_desktop . 3831.25 |========================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: MG.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2nd_desktop . 417.05 |==========
3rd_desktop . 2342.31 |========================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: SP.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2nd_desktop . 274.52 |======
3rd_desktop . 2384.35 |========================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: UA.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2nd_desktop . 2.05 |=========
3rd_desktop . 13.64 |==========================================================
Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2
Pfam Database Search
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2nd_desktop . 225.46 |=========================================================
3rd_desktop . 25.61 |======
Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.706
Multiple Sequence Alignment
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2nd_desktop . 112.61 |=========================================================
3rd_desktop . 38.76 |====================