computing_science
Competition between my computers.


2nd_desktop: 

	Processor: Intel Celeron 2.40GHz @ 2.39GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: American Megatrends P1.30, Chipset: VIA PT880, Memory: 1536MB, Disk: 80GB SAMSUNG SP0842N, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 128MB (250/400MHz)

	OS: Ubuntu 11.04, Kernel: 2.6.38-10-generic (i686), Desktop: GNOME 2.32.1, Display Server: X Server 1.10.1, Display Driver: NVIDIA 173.14.30, OpenGL: 2.1.2 NVIDIA 173.14.30, Compiler: GCC 4.5.2, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050

3rd_desktop: 

	Processor: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.33GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte EP45T-UD3R, Chipset: Intel 4 + ICH10R, Memory: 4096MB, Disk: 500GB Hitachi HDP72505, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT 1024MB (650/400MHz)

	OS: LinuxMint 11, Kernel: 2.6.38-8-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME 2.32.1, Display Server: X Server 1.10.1, Display Driver: NVIDIA 270.41.06, OpenGL: 3.3.0 NVIDIA 270.41.06, Compiler: GCC 4.5.2, File-System: ext2/ext3, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050


Himeno Benchmark 3.0
Poisson Pressure Solver
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
2nd_desktop . 90.37  |=================================
3rd_desktop . 156.60 |=========================================================


Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.706
Multiple Sequence Alignment
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2nd_desktop . 112.61 |=========================================================
3rd_desktop . 38.76  |====================


Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2
Pfam Database Search
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2nd_desktop . 225.46 |=========================================================
3rd_desktop . 25.61  |======


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: BT.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2nd_desktop . 709.97  |=======
3rd_desktop . 5648.04 |========================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: CG.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2nd_desktop . 34.78   |=
3rd_desktop . 1320.58 |========================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: EP.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2nd_desktop . 7.20  |=====
3rd_desktop . 81.65 |==========================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: FT.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2nd_desktop . 162.19  |===
3rd_desktop . 2614.07 |========================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: IS.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2nd_desktop . 21.26 |=================
3rd_desktop . 73.29 |==========================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: LU.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2nd_desktop . 436.85  |======
3rd_desktop . 3831.25 |========================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: MG.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2nd_desktop . 417.05  |==========
3rd_desktop . 2342.31 |========================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: SP.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2nd_desktop . 274.52  |======
3rd_desktop . 2384.35 |========================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: UA.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2nd_desktop . 2.05  |=========
3rd_desktop . 13.64 |==========================================================