1012310-IV-HAMMER37122
Running pts/blogbench-1.0.0, pts/compress-gzip-1.1.0, pts/compress-lzma-1.2.0, pts/postmark-1.0.0, pts/unpack-linux-1.0.0, pts/tiobench-1.1.0.


UFS On DragonflyBSD: 

	Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 (1 Core), Motherboard: Unknown, Memory: 4017MB, Disk: Unknown

	OS: DragonFly, Kernel: 2.8-RELEASE (x86_64), Display Server: Unknown, Compiler: GCC 4.1.2, File-System: ufs, Screen Resolution: Unknown


BlogBench 1.0
Test: Read
Final Score > Higher Is Better
UFS On DragonflyBSD . 163640 |=================================================


BlogBench 1.0
Test: Write
Final Score > Higher Is Better
UFS On DragonflyBSD . 65 |=====================================================


LZMA Compression
256MB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
UFS On DragonflyBSD . 226.31 |=================================================


PostMark 1.51
Disk Transaction Performance
TPS > Higher Is Better
UFS On DragonflyBSD . 76 |=====================================================


Unpacking The Linux Kernel
linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
UFS On DragonflyBSD . 50.09 |==================================================


Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 64MB - Thread Count: 4
MB/s > Higher Is Better
UFS On DragonflyBSD . 56.87 |==================================================


Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
Test: Random Write - Size Per Thread: 64MB - Thread Count: 4
MB/s > Higher Is Better
UFS On DragonflyBSD . 3.34 |===================================================


Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
Test: Read - Size Per Thread: 64MB - Thread Count: 4
MB/s > Higher Is Better
UFS On DragonflyBSD . 550.75 |=================================================


Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
Test: Random Read - Size Per Thread: 64MB - Thread Count: 4
MB/s > Higher Is Better
UFS On DragonflyBSD . 502.25 |=================================================