SuperTuxKart

This is a test of SuperTuxKart, an open-source racing game. The engine, Antarctica, is a highly modified version of Irrlicht and uses OpenGL 3.1+. Bullet is used for physics. Sound is provided by OpenAL.

To run this test with the Phoronix Test Suite, the basic command is: phoronix-test-suite benchmark supertuxkart.

Project Site

supertuxkart.net

Test Created

6 December 2010

Last Updated

20 May 2020

Test Maintainer

Matthew Trescott 

Test Type

Graphics

Average Install Time

15 Seconds

Average Run Time

8 Minutes, 19 Seconds

Accolades

150k+ Downloads

Supported Platforms

Supported Architectures

x86_64

Public Result Uploads *Reported Test Completions **Reported Installs **Test Profile Page Views ***OpenBenchmarking.orgEventsSuperTuxKart Popularity Statisticspts/supertuxkart2010.122011.052011.102012.032012.082013.012013.062013.112014.042014.092015.022015.072015.122016.052016.102017.032017.082018.012018.062018.112019.042019.092020.022020.072020.122021.052021.102022.032022.082023.012023.062023.1115K30K45K60K75K
* Uploading of benchmark result data to OpenBenchmarking.org is always optional (opt-in) via the Phoronix Test Suite for users wishing to share their results publicly.
** Data based on those opting to upload their test results to OpenBenchmarking.org and users enabling the opt-in anonymous statistics reporting while running benchmarks from an Internet-connected platform.
*** Test profile page view reporting began March 2021.
Data updated weekly as of 18 March 2024.
1920 x 108063.3%800 x 60036.7%Resolution Option PopularityOpenBenchmarking.org
Fullscreen85.0%Windowed15.0%Mode Option PopularityOpenBenchmarking.org
Ultimate46.8%High22.5%Low30.7%Graphics Effects Option PopularityOpenBenchmarking.org
847.2%419.2%133.5%Karts Option PopularityOpenBenchmarking.org
Candela City73.3%Gran Paradiso Island11.1%Cocoa Temple10.1%Around the Lighthouse5.5%Scene Option PopularityOpenBenchmarking.org

Revision History

pts/supertuxkart-1.6.0   [View Source]   Wed, 20 May 2020 10:38:25 GMT
Update against STK 1.1.

pts/supertuxkart-1.5.2   [View Source]   Wed, 17 Jan 2018 20:48:42 GMT
Import latest eliasvan/supertuxkart test to pts/ mainline

pts/supertuxkart-1.4.0   [View Source]   Sat, 25 Nov 2017 12:40:10 GMT
Update against SuperTuxKart 0.9.3, changes by matthewtrescott

pts/supertuxkart-1.3.0   [View Source]   Tue, 21 Apr 2015 11:01:27 GMT
Update against upstream SuperTuxKart 0.9.

pts/supertuxkart-1.2.1   [View Source]   Sun, 16 Feb 2014 14:45:04 GMT
Update description string.

pts/supertuxkart-1.2.0   [View Source]   Thu, 06 Feb 2014 11:45:43 GMT
Update against upstream SuperTuxKart 0.8.1 release and making necessary changes due to game/engine changes. Also few test profile enhancements.

pts/supertuxkart-1.1.0   [View Source]   Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:43:47 GMT
Update against upstream SuperTuxKart 0.8.0.

pts/supertuxkart-1.0.0   [View Source]   Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:23:16 GMT
Initial import into OpenBenchmarking.org


Performance Metrics

Analyze Test Configuration:

SuperTuxKart 1.1

Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City

OpenBenchmarking.org metrics for this test profile configuration based on 77 public results since 17 June 2020 with the latest data as of 13 March 2024.

Below is an overview of the generalized performance for components where there is sufficient statistically significant data based upon user-uploaded results. It is important to keep in mind particularly in the Linux/open-source space there can be vastly different OS configurations, with this overview intended to offer just general guidance as to the performance expectations.

Component
Percentile Rank
# Compatible Public Results
Frames Per Second (Average)
Median
50th
119
Low-Tier
25th
< 118
OpenBenchmarking.orgDistribution Of Public Results - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City77 Results Range From 86 To 120 Frames Per Second8689929598101104107110113116119122918273645

Based on OpenBenchmarking.org data, the selected test / test configuration (SuperTuxKart 1.1 - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City) has an average run-time of 4 minutes. By default this test profile is set to run at least 3 times but may increase if the standard deviation exceeds pre-defined defaults or other calculations deem additional runs necessary for greater statistical accuracy of the result.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMinutesTime Required To Complete BenchmarkResolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela CityRun-Time3691215Min: 3 / Avg: 3.43 / Max: 7

Based on public OpenBenchmarking.org results, the selected test / test configuration has an average standard deviation of 0.2%.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterAverage Deviation Between RunsResolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela CityDeviation246810Min: 0 / Avg: 0.21 / Max: 2

Tested CPU Architectures

This benchmark has been successfully tested on the below mentioned architectures. The CPU architectures listed is where successful OpenBenchmarking.org result uploads occurred, namely for helping to determine if a given test is compatible with various alternative CPU architectures.

CPU Architecture
Kernel Identifier
Verified On
Intel / AMD x86 64-bit
x86_64
(Many Processors)

Recent Test Results

OpenBenchmarking.org Results Compare

1 System - 3 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core - ASUS ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI - AMD Device 14d8

Pop 22.04 - 6.6.10-76060610-generic - GNOME Shell 42.5

1 System - 8 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core - ASUS ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI - AMD Device 14d8

Pop 22.04 - 6.6.10-76060610-generic - GNOME Shell 42.5

1 System - 4 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core - ASUS ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI - AMD Device 14d8

Pop 22.04 - 6.6.10-76060610-generic - GNOME Shell 42.5

1 System - 5 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core - ASUS ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI - AMD Device 14d8

Pop 22.04 - 6.6.10-76060610-generic - GNOME Shell 42.5

1 System - 2 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core - ASUS ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI - AMD Device 14d8

Pop 22.04 - 6.6.10-76060610-generic - GNOME Shell 42.5

1 System - 5 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core - ASUS ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI - AMD Device 14d8

Pop 22.04 - 6.6.10-76060610-generic - GNOME Shell 42.5

1 System - 8 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-6700HQ - ASUS GL752VW v1.0 - Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5

Ubuntu 22.04 - 6.2.0-26-generic - GNOME Shell 42.9

1 System - 2 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-6700HQ - ASUS GL752VW v1.0 - Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5

Ubuntu 22.04 - 6.2.0-26-generic - GNOME Shell 42.9

1 System - 5 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-6700HQ - ASUS GL752VW v1.0 - Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5

Ubuntu 22.04 - 6.2.0-26-generic - GNOME Shell 42.9

1 System - 4 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-6700HQ - ASUS GL752VW v1.0 - Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5

Ubuntu 22.04 - 6.2.0-26-generic - GNOME Shell 42.9

1 System - 9 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-6700HQ - ASUS GL752VW v1.0 - Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5

Ubuntu 22.04 - 6.2.0-26-generic - GNOME Shell 42.9

1 System - 3 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-6700HQ - ASUS GL752VW v1.0 - Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5

Ubuntu 22.04 - 6.2.0-26-generic - GNOME Shell 42.9

1 System - 1 Benchmark Result

Intel Core i5-4300M - Dell 0VWNW8 - Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3

cachyos rolling - 6.6.3-2-cachyos-lto - GNOME Shell 45.1

1 System - 1 Benchmark Result

Intel Core i5-4300M - Dell 0VWNW8 - Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3

cachyos rolling - 6.6.3-2-cachyos-lto - GNOME Shell 45.1

Most Popular Test Results

OpenBenchmarking.org Results Compare

1 System - 2 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i3-2100 - HP 1495 - Intel 2nd Generation Core DRAM

Ubuntu 18.04 - 5.4.0-58-generic - GNOME Shell 3.28.4

1 System - 2 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i3-2100 - HP 1495 - Intel 2nd Generation Core DRAM

Ubuntu 18.04 - 5.4.0-58-generic - GNOME Shell 3.28.4

1 System - 2 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i3-2100 - HP 1495 - Intel 2nd Generation Core DRAM

Ubuntu 18.04 - 5.4.0-58-generic - GNOME Shell 3.28.4

1 System - 6 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i3-2100 - HP 1495 - Intel 2nd Generation Core DRAM

Ubuntu 18.04 - 5.4.0-58-generic - GNOME Shell 3.28.4

1 System - 2 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i3-2100 - HP 1495 - Intel 2nd Generation Core DRAM

Ubuntu 18.04 - 5.4.0-58-generic - GNOME Shell 3.28.4

1 System - 2 Benchmark Results

Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 - ASUS P5K3 Deluxe - Intel 82G33

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.4.0-37-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.1

1 System - 2 Benchmark Results

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 - Dell 0Y958C - Intel 4 DRAM + ICH10DO

Debian 10 - 4.19.0-13-amd64 - GNOME Shell 3.30.2

2 Systems - 45 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core - ASRock X570 Taichi - AMD Starship

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.4.0-54-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.4

1 System - 7 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-4700HQ - ASUS G750JX v1.0 - Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3

Arch rolling - 5.9.6-arch1-1 - X Server 1.20.9

1 System - 55 Benchmark Results

1 System - 16 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-4700HQ - ASUS G750JX v1.0 - Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3

Arch rolling - 5.9.8-arch1-1 - X Server 1.20.9

1 System - 4 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i3-2100 - HP 1495 - Intel 2nd Generation Core DRAM

Ubuntu 18.04 - 5.4.0-58-generic - GNOME Shell 3.28.4

1 System - 45 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core - ASRock X570 Taichi - AMD Starship

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.4.0-53-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.4

Find More Test Results