testesuitecompletaifspxenserver 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 testing with a (4.13 BIOS) and Microsoft Basic Display on Microsoft Windows Server 2019 Standard Evaluation Build 17763 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620: Processor: 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 @ 2.40GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: (4.13 BIOS), Memory: 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz, Disk: 80GB XENSRC PVDISK Disk, Graphics: Microsoft Basic Display, Network: Intel PRO/1000 MT Connection OS: Microsoft Windows Server 2019 Standard Evaluation Build 17763, Kernel: 10.0.17763.5576 (x86_64), Display Driver: 10.0.17763.1, File-System: NTFS, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 75.80 |============================= t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 67.84 |============================= LeelaChessZero 0.30 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 34 |================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 18 |================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 62 |================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 213 |=============================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 571 |=============================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 34 |================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 611 |=============================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 38 |================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 232 |=============================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 201 |=============================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 276 |=============================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 79 |================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 333 |=============================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 103 |=============================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 583 |=============================== Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 998.72 |============================ Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.471 Seconds < Lower Is Better BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 6.40 |============================== CacheBench Read Cache MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 6411.47 |=========================== CacheBench Write Cache MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 18625.77 |========================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 327.89 |============================ LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 1818.3 |============================ LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 45.63 |============================= LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 1689.7 |============================ LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 17.50 |============================= LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 1770.6 |============================ Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 3884169 |=========================== TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 521595 |============================ 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 14726 |============================= 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 13389 |============================= Stockfish 16.1 Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 5883941 |=========================== Gzip Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 93.93 |============================= FLAC Audio Encoding 1.4 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 71.12 |============================= LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 20.90 |============================= m-queens 1.2 Time To Solve Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 375.02 |============================ N-Queens 1.0 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 69.91 |============================= Aircrack-ng 1.7 k/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 23.5 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 23.5 Algorithm: scrypt kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 23.5 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 23.5 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 23.5 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 23.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 23.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 23.5 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 23.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 23.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 23.5 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better WinSAT Test: Disk MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 5704.59 |=========================== WinSAT Test: Memory MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 14261.82 |========================== WinSAT Test: CPU Encryption MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 1146.70 |=========================== WinSAT Test: CPU Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 8184 MB 48MHz - 4 x Intel Xeon E5620 . 914.74 |============================ RAR Compression 6.0.2 Seconds < Lower Is Better WavPack Audio Encoding 5.7 Seconds < Lower Is Better