olr Intel Core i7-8565U testing with a Dell XPS 13 9380 0KTW76 (1.17.0 BIOS) and Intel UHD 620 WHL GT2 15GB on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. q: Processor: Intel Core i7-8565U @ 4.60GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell XPS 13 9380 0KTW76 (1.17.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Point-LP, Memory: 2 x 8GB LPDDR3-2133MT/s Samsung K4EBE304EC-EGCG, Disk: SK hynix PC401 NVMe 256GB, Graphics: Intel UHD 620 WHL GT2 15GB (1150MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC3271, Network: Qualcomm Atheros QCA6174 802.11ac OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.7.0-060700rc5-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.1, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 24.0~git2312240600.c05261~oibaf~m (git-c05261a 2023-12-24 mantic-oibaf-ppa), OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 b: Processor: Intel Core i7-8565U @ 4.60GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell XPS 13 9380 0KTW76 (1.17.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Point-LP, Memory: 2 x 8GB LPDDR3-2133MT/s Samsung K4EBE304EC-EGCG, Disk: SK hynix PC401 NVMe 256GB, Graphics: Intel UHD 620 WHL GT2 15GB (1150MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC3271, Network: Qualcomm Atheros QCA6174 802.11ac OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.7.0-060700rc5-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.1, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 24.0~git2312240600.c05261~oibaf~m (git-c05261a 2023-12-24 mantic-oibaf-ppa), OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 c: Processor: Intel Core i7-8565U @ 4.60GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell XPS 13 9380 0KTW76 (1.17.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Point-LP, Memory: 2 x 8GB LPDDR3-2133MT/s Samsung K4EBE304EC-EGCG, Disk: SK hynix PC401 NVMe 256GB, Graphics: Intel UHD 620 WHL GT2 15GB (1150MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC3271, Network: Qualcomm Atheros QCA6174 802.11ac OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.7.0-060700rc5-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.1, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 24.0~git2312240600.c05261~oibaf~m (git-c05261a 2023-12-24 mantic-oibaf-ppa), OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Libplacebo 6.338.2 Test: deband_heavy FPS > Higher Is Better q . 16.66 |==================================================================== b . 16.63 |==================================================================== c . 16.67 |==================================================================== Libplacebo 6.338.2 Test: polar_nocompute FPS > Higher Is Better q . 30.69 |==================================================================== b . 30.73 |==================================================================== c . 30.69 |==================================================================== Libplacebo 6.338.2 Test: hdr_peakdetect FPS > Higher Is Better q . 157.88 |=================================================================== b . 158.27 |=================================================================== c . 158.00 |=================================================================== Libplacebo 6.338.2 Test: hdr_lut FPS > Higher Is Better q . 124.29 |=================================================================== b . 124.65 |=================================================================== c . 124.97 |=================================================================== Libplacebo 6.338.2 Test: av1_grain_lap FPS > Higher Is Better q . 137.46 |=================================================================== b . 138.18 |=================================================================== c . 138.47 |=================================================================== Libplacebo 6.338.2 Test: gaussian FPS > Higher Is Better q . 152.47 |================================================================== b . 154.04 |=================================================================== c . 154.22 |=================================================================== ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2 Operation: FP64 Compute TFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better q . 0.105 |==================================================================== b . 0.105 |==================================================================== c . 0.105 |==================================================================== ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2 Operation: FP32 Compute TFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better q . 0.406 |==================================================================== b . 0.407 |==================================================================== c . 0.406 |==================================================================== ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2 Operation: FP16 Compute TFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better q . 0.746 |==================================================================== b . 0.744 |==================================================================== c . 0.744 |==================================================================== ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2 Operation: INT64 Compute TIOPs/s > Higher Is Better q . 0.015 |==================================================================== b . 0.015 |==================================================================== c . 0.015 |==================================================================== ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2 Operation: INT32 Compute TIOPs/s > Higher Is Better q . 0.14 |===================================================================== b . 0.14 |===================================================================== c . 0.14 |===================================================================== ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2 Operation: INT16 Compute TIOPs/s > Higher Is Better q . 0.818 |==================================================================== b . 0.819 |==================================================================== c . 0.818 |==================================================================== ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2 Operation: INT8 Compute TIOPs/s > Higher Is Better q . 0.141 |==================================================================== b . 0.141 |==================================================================== c . 0.141 |==================================================================== ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2 Operation: Memory Bandwidth Coalesced Read GB/s > Higher Is Better q . 22.54 |=============================================================== b . 24.46 |==================================================================== c . 24.37 |==================================================================== ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2 Operation: Memory Bandwidth Coalesced Write GB/s > Higher Is Better q . 25.34 |==================================================================== b . 25.29 |==================================================================== c . 25.12 |=================================================================== NAMD 3.0b6 Input: ATPase with 327,506 Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better q . 0.14213 |============================================================= b . 0.14672 |=============================================================== c . 0.15357 |================================================================== NAMD 3.0b6 Input: STMV with 1,066,628 Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better q . 0.04271 |============================================================== b . 0.04569 |================================================================== c . 0.04314 |============================================================== CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better q . 7844.52 |================================================================== b . 7859.27 |================================================================== c . 7860.21 |================================================================== CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better q . 59859.81 |================================================================= b . 60010.07 |================================================================= c . 59803.14 |================================================================= CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better q . 88937.36 |================================================================ b . 90359.39 |================================================================= c . 90473.86 |================================================================= LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better q . 600.77 |=================================================================== b . 604.63 |=================================================================== c . 604.92 |=================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better q . 3248.2 |=================================================================== b . 3271.0 |=================================================================== c . 3270.5 |=================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better q . 87.61 |==================================================================== b . 88.20 |==================================================================== c . 87.96 |==================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better q . 3016.8 |=================================================================== b . 3011.8 |=================================================================== c . 3009.4 |=================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better q . 31.89 |==================================================================== b . 31.91 |==================================================================== c . 31.74 |==================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better q . 3151.0 |=================================================================== b . 3149.8 |=================================================================== c . 3136.3 |=================================================================== dav1d 1.4 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better q . 255.35 |================================================================== b . 257.56 |=================================================================== c . 257.32 |=================================================================== dav1d 1.4 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better q . 71.35 |=================================================================== b . 71.90 |==================================================================== c . 71.64 |==================================================================== dav1d 1.4 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better q . 248.42 |========================================================== b . 284.62 |=================================================================== c . 277.12 |================================================================= dav1d 1.4 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better q . 202.50 |================================================================== b . 205.86 |=================================================================== c . 200.55 |================================================================= rav1e 0.7 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better q . 0.269 |=================================================================== b . 0.274 |==================================================================== c . 0.273 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.7 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better q . 1.544 |=================================================================== b . 1.567 |==================================================================== c . 1.572 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.7 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better q . 1.997 |================================================================= b . 2.068 |=================================================================== c . 2.102 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.7 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better q . 5.535 |=================================================================== b . 5.607 |==================================================================== c . 5.511 |=================================================================== VVenC 1.11 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better q . 1.162 |=================================================================== b . 1.183 |==================================================================== c . 1.174 |=================================================================== VVenC 1.11 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better q . 2.710 |==================================================================== b . 2.621 |================================================================== c . 2.677 |=================================================================== VVenC 1.11 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better q . 3.820 |=============================================================== b . 3.495 |========================================================== c . 4.094 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.11 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better q . 11.28 |==================================================================== b . 10.26 |============================================================== c . 10.06 |============================================================= Intel Open Image Denoise 2.2 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only Images / Sec > Higher Is Better q . 0.11 |===================================================================== b . 0.11 |===================================================================== c . 0.11 |===================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 2.2 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only Images / Sec > Higher Is Better q . 0.11 |=============================================================== b . 0.12 |===================================================================== c . 0.11 |=============================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 2.2 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 - Device: CPU-Only Images / Sec > Higher Is Better q . 0.06 |===================================================================== b . 0.06 |===================================================================== c . 0.06 |===================================================================== OSPRay 3.1 Benchmark: particle_volume/ao/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better q . 0.806105 |========================================================== b . 0.904186 |================================================================= c . 0.837598 |============================================================ OSPRay 3.1 Benchmark: particle_volume/scivis/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better q . 0.821240 |================================================================= b . 0.817445 |================================================================= c . 0.815739 |================================================================= OSPRay 3.1 Benchmark: particle_volume/pathtracer/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better q . 36.75 |==================================================================== b . 36.98 |==================================================================== c . 35.78 |================================================================== OSPRay 3.1 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/ao/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better q . 0.505477 |============================================================== b . 0.503723 |============================================================== c . 0.527759 |================================================================= OSPRay 3.1 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/scivis/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better q . 0.520723 |=============================================================== b . 0.541093 |================================================================= c . 0.505290 |============================================================= OSPRay 3.1 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better q . 0.785233 |============================================================ b . 0.856350 |================================================================= c . 0.828653 |=============================================================== Y-Cruncher 0.8.3 Pi Digits To Calculate: 500M Seconds < Lower Is Better q . 61.73 |================================================================ b . 64.05 |=================================================================== c . 65.44 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better q . 13858 |================================================================== b . 14247 |==================================================================== c . 13526 |================================================================= OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better q . 13267 |==================================================================== b . 12889 |================================================================== c . 13261 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better q . 15717 |================================================================== b . 16228 |==================================================================== c . 15780 |================================================================== OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better q . 210562 |=================================================================== b . 209741 |=================================================================== c . 210229 |=================================================================== OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better q . 423214 |=================================================================== b . 418379 |================================================================== c . 419296 |================================================================== OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better q . 211381 |=================================================================== b . 210474 |=================================================================== c . 209777 |================================================================== OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better q . 425232 |=================================================================== b . 422608 |=================================================================== c . 423911 |=================================================================== OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better q . 253704 |=================================================================== b . 249464 |================================================================== c . 248847 |================================================================== OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better q . 494610 |=================================================================== b . 495269 |=================================================================== c . 490887 |================================================================== GROMACS 2024 Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better q . 0.360 |=================================================================== b . 0.364 |==================================================================== c . 0.359 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better q . 1.08 |==================================================================== b . 1.09 |===================================================================== c . 1.08 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better q . 3.84 |===================================================================== b . 3.83 |===================================================================== c . 3.80 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better q . 8.74 |===================================================================== b . 8.74 |===================================================================== c . 8.80 |===================================================================== TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better q . 3.81 |===================================================================== b . 3.81 |===================================================================== c . 3.83 |===================================================================== Speedb 2.7 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better q . 283205 |=================================================================== b . 283659 |=================================================================== c . 284078 |=================================================================== Speedb 2.7 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better q . 11901676 |================================================================ b . 11963476 |================================================================= c . 12020149 |================================================================= Speedb 2.7 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better q . 142203 |================================================================ b . 143907 |================================================================= c . 147829 |=================================================================== Speedb 2.7 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better q . 364303 |================================================================== b . 367303 |================================================================== c . 371131 |=================================================================== Speedb 2.7 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better q . 2433 |===================================================================== b . 2127 |============================================================ c . 2313 |================================================================== Speedb 2.7 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better q . 816876 |================================================================= b . 841796 |=================================================================== c . 794806 |=============================================================== Speedb 2.7 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better q . 541823 |=================================================================== b . 541899 |=================================================================== c . 530015 |==================================================================