test_pc VMware testing on Debian 12 via the Phoronix Test Suite. first_kernel_bmark: Processor: Intel Core i5-6500 (2 Cores), Motherboard: Intel 440BX (VMW201.00V.20829224.B64.2211211842 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440BX/ZX/DX, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 107GB Virtual disk + 10001GB 721010ALN600, Graphics: llvmpipe, Network: VMware VMXNET3 OS: Debian 12, Kernel: 6.1.0-11-amd64 (x86_64), Desktop: LXQt 1.2.0, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 22.3.6 (LLVM 15.0.6 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1009, System Layer: VMware LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 2640 |==================================================== Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 7536.7 |================================================== Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 14726.8 |================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 6843.50 |================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 6799.94 |================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 7098.22 |================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 6344.29 |================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 6328.97 |================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 6332.61 |================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 43.45 |=================================================== t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 13.96 |=================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 0.0842 |================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 0.0879 |================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 0.0429 |================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 0.0433 |================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 0.0709 |================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 0.0715 |================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 0.1067 |================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 0.1092 |================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 us < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 47.35 |=================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 us < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 47.80 |=================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 us < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 46.96 |=================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 us < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 46.69 |=================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 16.56 |=================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 18.36 |=================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 141009 |================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 251407 |================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 19.57 |=================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 20.25 |=================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 398263 |================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 430941 |================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 498 |===================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 498 |===================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 497 |===================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 497 |===================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 100 |===================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 1000 |==================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 3200 |==================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 6400 |==================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 23763 |=================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 19297 |=================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 35702 |=================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 1.05 |==================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 27592 |=================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 24042 |=================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 33.6 |==================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 67.1 |==================================================== WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test Seconds < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 583.52 |================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Epoll Wait ops/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 354149 |================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Futex Hash ops/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 941181 |================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Memcpy 1MB GB/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 26.40 |=================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Memset 1MB GB/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 45.15 |=================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Sched Pipe ops/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 40465 |=================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Futex Lock-Pi ops/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 6801 |==================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Syscall Basic ops/sec > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 1030501 |================================================= OSBench Test: Create Files us Per Event < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 38.43 |=================================================== OSBench Test: Create Threads us Per Event < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 36.20 |=================================================== OSBench Test: Launch Programs us Per Event < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 320.47 |================================================== OSBench Test: Create Processes us Per Event < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 90.92 |=================================================== OSBench Test: Memory Allocations Ns Per Event < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 123.86 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 675253 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 664958 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 643166 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 595140 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 502816 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 392696 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 804174 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 800298 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 791065 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 758929 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 697297 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 605382 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 791642 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 782177 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 764119 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 737200 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 673289 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 588570 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 519204 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 500762 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 499022 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 466132 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 447460 |================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 342820 |================================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 43.67 |=================================================== Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 84.14 |=================================================== Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 170.69 |================================================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 342.99 |================================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 43.20 |=================================================== Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 695.71 |================================================== Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 84.20 |=================================================== Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 168.70 |================================================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 336.94 |================================================== Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 671.37 |================================================== Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 1357.12 |================================================= OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 563553873 |=============================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA512 byte/s > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 630162753 |=============================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 472.6 |=================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 31091.5 |================================================= OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20 byte/s > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 5624144147 |============================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 9900190923 |============================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 7271720640 |============================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 byte/s > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 3902182960 |============================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 18374 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 0.054 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 1980 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 0.505 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 43574 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 1.166 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 45119 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 2.216 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 38381 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 6.547 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 1402 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 35.66 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 28894 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 18.35 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 28888 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 27.93 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 28094 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 0.036 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 1153 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 87.23 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 635 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 395.84 |================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 241 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 2129.76 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 154 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 5209.33 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 1421 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 0.720 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 45585 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 1.097 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 2450 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 0.411 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 31197 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 3.327 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 29321 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 9.265 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 1407 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 37.48 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 27779 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 18.06 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 23570 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 36.18 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 343 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 3.381 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 8339 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first_kernel_bmark . 6.037 |===================================================