test1 Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0 testing with a HP 158A (J61 v03.96 BIOS) and NVIDIA Quadro 4000 on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. first test: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0 @ 3.80GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: HP 158A (J61 v03.96 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E5/Core, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 500GB Seagate FireCuda SE SSD ZP500GM30033 + 2 x 1000GB Hitachi HDS72101 + 0GB Compact Flash + 0GB SM/xD-Picture + 0GB SD/MMC + 0GB MS/MS-Pro/HG + 0GB SD/MMC/MS/MSPRO + 4GB USB DISK 2.0 + 1000GB Western Digital WD10EZEX-75Z, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro 4000, Audio: Realtek ALC262, Network: Intel 82579LM + Intel 82574L OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-71-generic (x86_64), Display Driver: nouveau, Vulkan: 1.3.224, Compiler: GCC 11.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better first test . 9.675 |=========================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync MB/s > Higher Is Better first test . 1 |=============================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better first test . 1599.20 |========================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better first test . 18.1 |============================================================ LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better first test . 97.48 |=========================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better first test . 17.0 |============================================================ LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better first test . 103.68 |========================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better first test . 9.665 |=========================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better first test . 13.30 |=========================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better first test . 83.16 |=========================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better first test . 17.2 |============================================================ LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better first test . 102.94 |========================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 13.77 |=========================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better first test . 2523975 |========================================================= BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better first test . 14106 |=========================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better first test . 1.46 |============================================================ simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet GB/s > Higher Is Better first test . 2 |=============================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better first test . 0.63 |============================================================ simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better first test . 1.84 |============================================================ simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better first test . 1.97 |============================================================ Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 2896 |============================================================ ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better first test . 206678 |========================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 0.20360552 |====================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 0.00196531 |====================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better first test . 1735994717 |====================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA512 byte/s > Higher Is Better first test . 1934630220 |====================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better first test . 1030.8 |========================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better first test . 67524.4 |========================================================= OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20 byte/s > Higher Is Better first test . 11382583570 |===================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better first test . 12349900663 |===================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better first test . 10591813447 |===================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 byte/s > Higher Is Better first test . 7807816043 |====================================================== Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better first test . 5.61 |============================================================ ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better first test . 101.53 |========================================================== ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Second Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better first test . 105.89 |========================================================== ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better first test . 105.85 |========================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 36108.39 |======================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 2.9 |============================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 39911.28 |======================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 2.5 |============================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 52166.00 |======================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 19.1 |============================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 40886.60 |======================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 2.4 |============================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 50943.88 |======================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 19.6 |============================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 46730.42 |======================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 21.1 |============================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 43309.84 |======================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 2.3 |============================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 40690.78 |======================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 2.4 |============================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 52109.06 |======================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 19.1 |============================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 40917.10 |======================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 2.4 |============================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 51125.87 |======================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 19.5 |============================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 46688.47 |======================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 21.1 |============================================================ Apache CouchDB 3.2.2 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 153.12 |========================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.2.2 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 553.08 |========================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.2.2 Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 307.25 |========================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.2.2 Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 1051.28 |========================================================= Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 5.50 |============================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 315.75 |========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 17.57 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 5.94 |============================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 4.23 |============================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 3.07 |============================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 2.88 |============================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 5.72 |============================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 314.68 |========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 17.51 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 6.58 |============================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 4.29 |============================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 3.35 |============================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 3.11 |============================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 6.28 |============================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 316.46 |========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 17.49 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 7.08 |============================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 4.65 |============================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 3.87 |============================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 3.38 |============================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 6.97 |============================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 315.51 |========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 17.38 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 7.88 |============================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 5.22 |============================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 5.02 |============================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 4.15 |============================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 26.04 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 313.66 |========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 17.59 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 13.78 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 17.65 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 20.98 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 22.70 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 25.26 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 315.19 |========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 17.43 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 13.95 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 17.95 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 20.29 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 20.26 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 47.87 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 313.71 |========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 17.45 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 22.15 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 34.79 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 42.12 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 42.35 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 43.21 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 313.16 |========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 17.41 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 20.86 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 32.80 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 36.80 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 38.66 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 83.01 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 311.11 |========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 17.41 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 53.39 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 62.86 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 73.51 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 74.83 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 83.45 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 315.86 |========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 17.47 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 46.44 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 61.17 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 74.20 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 74.83 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 24.73 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 314.48 |========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 17.51 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 13.98 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 17.69 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 20.46 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 19.75 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 25.37 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 314.83 |========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 17.44 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 14.60 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 18.17 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 21.01 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 20.05 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 43.94 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 316.53 |========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 17.49 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 21.32 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 31.91 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 38.57 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 38.20 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 44.18 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 315.86 |========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 17.51 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 21.36 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 31.70 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 38.23 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 37.75 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 83.97 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 317.02 |========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 17.50 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 45.47 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 59.91 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 73.77 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 74.55 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 84.67 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 313.87 |========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 17.49 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 45.69 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 61.69 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 72.90 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 77.28 |=========================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better first test . 222.3 |=========================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better first test . 222.3 |=========================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better first test . 222.4 |=========================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better first test . 221.9 |=========================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better first test . 20381.8 |========================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better first test . 20551.9 |========================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better first test . 20507.5 |========================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better first test . 23607.7 |========================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better first test . 23615.8 |========================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better first test . 23129.7 |========================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better first test . 24503.7 |========================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better first test . 24501.9 |========================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better first test . 23851.5 |========================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better first test . 28483.4 |========================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better first test . 27734.9 |========================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better first test . 26998.9 |========================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better first test . 19503.8 |========================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better first test . 21683.5 |========================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better first test . 22337.8 |========================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better first test . 25176.6 |========================================================= Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 1631362.41 |====================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 1776973.31 |====================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 1481465.77 |====================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 1522099.10 |====================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 1614367.64 |====================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 1451171.92 |====================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 1057792.69 |====================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 846003.13 |======================================================= Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 1217382.94 |====================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 828721.26 |======================================================= Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 812848.49 |======================================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 1946029.57 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 1359544.04 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 1787013.88 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 2045504.99 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 1550769.62 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 1352814.85 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 1651781.71 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 1996977.37 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 944905.89 |======================================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 1551051.31 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 1326122.03 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 1072509.42 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 1071480.50 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 1492782.57 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 1043912.29 |====================================================== KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: HMSET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: HMSET - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: HMSET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: HMSET - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 2549 |============================================================ MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 944 |============================================================= MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 463 |============================================================= MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 395 |============================================================= MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 412 |============================================================= MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 1024 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 415 |============================================================= MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 2048 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 401 |============================================================= MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 4096 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 353 |============================================================= MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 8192 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 359 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 24187 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 0.042 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 1449 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 0.690 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 231037 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 0.217 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 234837 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 0.426 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 235190 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 1.063 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 1179 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 42.40 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 229198 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 2.181 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 228839 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 3.497 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 22707 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 0.044 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 1006 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 99.39 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 219055 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 4.566 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 635 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 393.49 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 370 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 1373.61 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 262 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 3140.02 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 1388 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 0.721 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 219753 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 0.227 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 21023 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 0.048 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 227 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 4617.89 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 224188 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 0.446 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 221759 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 1.127 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 22403 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 2.235 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 221257 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 2.260 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 211061 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 3.791 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 1324 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 0.755 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 187059 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 0.267 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 25751 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 3.884 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 192562 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 5.206 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 22109 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 11.31 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 17207 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 29.06 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 13806 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 57.94 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 189972 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 0.527 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 185797 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 1.345 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 8236 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 6.085 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 175629 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 2.847 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 152611 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 5.245 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 11201 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 89.48 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 10198 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 9.863 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 143546 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 6.969 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 12970 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 19.28 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 10564 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 47.64 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 10050 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 79.99 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better first test . 10009 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better first test . 99.91 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better first test . 95.56 |=========================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 1149781.62 |====================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 1211011.46 |====================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 1020230.35 |====================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 1044301.76 |====================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 1134006.80 |====================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 990773.91 |======================================================= memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 1017334.25 |====================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 1126537.90 |====================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 1053730.57 |====================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 1139301.72 |====================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 994801.73 |======================================================= memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 965268.45 |======================================================= memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 1094712.35 |====================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 948097.39 |======================================================= memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better first test . 1116053.52 |====================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Reads Op/s > Higher Is Better first test . 41200 |=========================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better first test . 49799 |=========================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better first test . 40304 |=========================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better first test . 39579 |=========================================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better first test . 359219 |========================================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better first test . 21643621 |======================================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better first test . 214340 |========================================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better first test . 437598 |========================================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better first test . 8175 |============================================================ RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better first test . 1403795 |========================================================= RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better first test . 769149 |========================================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 15779.6 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 16581.1 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 55918.1 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 60136.9 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 16630.5 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 15947.2 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 16245.0 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 16283.9 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 16520.6 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 60166.4 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 63039.0 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 64432.7 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 17005.5 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 16907.9 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 16781.0 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 16497.6 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 16330.0 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 64574.5 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 63686.1 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 16265.5 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 16518.8 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 17324.4 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 17755.0 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 56086.3 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 59130.2 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 17801.1 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 17435.7 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 17484.9 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 63781.1 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 63930.5 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 63758.6 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 16713.6 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 17242.1 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 17224.0 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 17909.4 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 17684.7 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 17774.0 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 63626.3 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 63780.5 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 17705.2 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 17583.6 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 17594.4 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 17597.6 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 17422.9 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 17544.7 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 17666.5 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 18219.6 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 18383.7 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 17660.5 |========================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 19938.75 |======================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 21607.32 |======================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 21432.79 |======================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 21083.84 |======================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 20757.50 |======================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 4000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 1538 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 646 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 6665 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 591 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 26187354 |======================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 2 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 1415132115 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 3 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 25022 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 631 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 29314 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 1077 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 32662 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 1933 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 32315 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 3927 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 40796 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 4727 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 1989 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 495 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 12383 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 318 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 1368 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 738 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 4781 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 835 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 1288 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 777 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 4857 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 822 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 32781 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 483 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 37756 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 839 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 43564 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 1447 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 14889 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 62 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 66687 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 56 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 30375 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 525 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 32230 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 990 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 32783 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 1948 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 1401 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 720 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 4850 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 823 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 29484 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 541 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 31415 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 1017 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 31861 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 2006 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 37397 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 3388 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 47539 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 3883 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 144198 |========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 105 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 165339 |========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 184 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 187136 |========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 312 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 31203 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 4097 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 32316 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 7900 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 1741 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 572 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 6754 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 591 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 29615 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 538 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 31475 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 1016 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 32422 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 1973 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 31857 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 4015 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 30521 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 8376 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 1704 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 586 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 6711 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 594 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 162832 |========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 749 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 257025 |========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 2113 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 50136 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 318 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 56090 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 568 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 66383 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 961 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 48703 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 20 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 107991 |========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 46 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 26951 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 4756 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 31029 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 8247 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 1484 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 673 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 8047 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 496 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 49447 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 323 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 55613 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 574 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 69617 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 918 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 52121 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 18 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 48838 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 68 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 2758 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 371 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 10041 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 391 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 74465 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 1716 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 75571 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 3368 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 95867 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 157 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 47471 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 336 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 58527 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 546 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 70604 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 906 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better first test . 42623 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better first test . 21 |==============================================================