EL7_1.8.0_171-b10
KVM testing on CentOS 7.5.1804 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4: 

	Processor: 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 @ 2.19GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Fedora OpenStack Nova (1.9.1-5.el7_3.3 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440FX- 82441FX PMC, Memory: 1 x 8192 MB RAM, Disk: 100GB, Graphics: Cirrus Logic GD 5446, Network: Red Hat Virtio device

	OS: CentOS 7.5.1804, Kernel: 3.10.0-862.9.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: KVM


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 . 1041.74 |==============================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 . 3555.76 |==============================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 . 1318.57 |==============================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 . 834.51 |===============================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 . 721.73 |===============================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 . 1494.46 |==============================================