kvm-test KVM testing on CentOS Linux 7 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 @ 2.70GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Red Hat KVM (1.11.0-2.el7 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440FX- 82441FX PMC, Memory: 1 x 16384 MB RAM, Disk: 215GB QEMU HDD, Graphics: Cirrus Logic GD 5446, Network: Red Hat Virtio device OS: CentOS Linux 7, Kernel: 3.10.0-862.9.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: KVM RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 21112 |================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 17970 |================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 19086 |================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 19323 |================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 17526 |================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 18576 |================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 16207 |================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 13008 |================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 15988 |================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 14980 |================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 28457 |================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 23041 |================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 25725 |================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 25372 |================================== CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 2744 |=================================== CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 21597 |================================== CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 24094 |================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 464 |==================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 96.46 |================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 251 |==================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 502 |==================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 588 |==================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 882 |==================================== Stockfish 9 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 12640417 |=============================== Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 7.83 |=================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: cos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 152951 |================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffs nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 6.48 |=================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sin nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 145066 |================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sqrt nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 14.68 |================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: tanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 69.40 |================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffsll nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 6.83 |=================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: pthread_once nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 7.43 |=================================== Redis 4.0.8 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 1138835 |================================ Redis 4.0.8 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 1068386 |================================ Redis 4.0.8 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 819709 |================================= Redis 4.0.8 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 1120249 |================================ Redis 4.0.8 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 970030 |================================= Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 16384 MB RAM - Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 . 13673 |==================================