SkySilk EPYC Gigantic
lxc testing on Ubuntu 18.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: 

	Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core @ 2.20GHz (64 Cores), Motherboard: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10 (A40 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Family 17h, Memory: 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2400MT/s, Disk: 2 x 128GB SAMSUNG MZNLF128, Graphics: Matrox G200eH, Monitor: Smart Cable, Network: Broadcom Limited NetXtreme BCM5719 Gigabit PCIe

	OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.15.18-1-pve (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 7.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: lxc


OpenSSL 1.1.0f
RSA 4096-bit Performance
Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 2295.87 |==============================================


OpenSSL 1.1.0f
Performance / Cost - RSA 4096-bit Performance
Signs Per Second Per Dollar > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 114793.50 |============================================


Apache Benchmark 2.4.29
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 14731.47 |=============================================


Apache Benchmark 2.4.29
Performance / Cost - Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second Per Dollar > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 210449.57 |============================================


Apache Siege 2.4.29
Concurrent Users: 200
Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 3557.71 |==============================================


Apache Siege 2.4.29
Performance / Cost - Concurrent Users: 200
Transactions Per Second Per Dollar > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 6588.35 |==============================================


MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 6608.58 |==============================================


MBW 2018-09-08
Performance / Cost - Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB
MiB/s Per Dollar > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 660858.00 |============================================


Darktable 2.4.2
Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 9.17 |=================================================


Darktable 2.4.2
Performance / Cost - Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only
Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 0.09 |=================================================


Darktable 2.4.2
Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 11.29 |================================================


Darktable 2.4.2
Performance / Cost - Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only
Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 0.11 |=================================================


Darktable 2.4.2
Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 5.07 |=================================================


Darktable 2.4.2
Performance / Cost - Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only
Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 0.05 |=================================================


Darktable 2.4.2
Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 0.26 |=================================================


Blender 2.79a
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 257.42 |===============================================


Blender 2.79a
Performance / Cost - Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 20.59 |================================================


Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 94.93 |================================================


Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18
Performance / Cost - Time To Compile
Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 12.34 |================================================


Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.7
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 32.66 |================================================


Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.7
Performance / Cost - Time To Compile
Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 1.63 |=================================================


TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b
Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping
FPS > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 216.31 |===============================================


TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b
Performance / Cost - Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping
FPS Per Dollar > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 4326.20 |==============================================


SQLite 3.22
Timed SQLite Insertions
Seconds < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 63.05 |================================================


SQLite 3.22
Performance / Cost - Timed SQLite Insertions
Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 3.78 |=================================================


Radiance Benchmark 5.0
Test: SMP Parallel
Seconds < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 327.55 |===============================================


Radiance Benchmark 5.0
Performance / Cost - Test: SMP Parallel
Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 32.76 |================================================


Go Benchmarks
Test: build
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 25381396266 |==========================================


Go Benchmarks
Performance / Cost - Test: build
Nanoseconds/Operation x Dollar < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 761441887.98 |=========================================


Go Benchmarks
Test: json
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 9438146 |==============================================


Go Benchmarks
Performance / Cost - Test: json
Nanoseconds/Operation x Dollar < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 94381.46 |=============================================


Go Benchmarks
Test: garbage
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 2755386 |==============================================


Go Benchmarks
Performance / Cost - Test: garbage
Nanoseconds/Operation x Dollar < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 27553.86 |=============================================


x264 2018-07-28
H.264 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 48.93 |================================================


x264 2018-07-28
Performance / Cost - H.264 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second Per Dollar > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 4893.00 |==============================================


x265 2.8
H.265 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 8.48 |=================================================


x265 2.8
Performance / Cost - H.265 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second Per Dollar > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 121.14 |===============================================


7-Zip Compression 16.02
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 39214 |================================================


7-Zip Compression 16.02
Performance / Cost - Compress Speed Test
MIPS Per Dollar > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 140050.00 |============================================


Stockfish 9
Total Time
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 20024594 |=============================================


Stockfish 9
Performance / Cost - Total Time
Nodes Per Second Per Dollar > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 200245940.00 |=========================================


Redis 4.0.8
Test: SET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 1056984.41 |===========================================


Redis 4.0.8
Performance / Cost - Test: SET
Requests Per Second Per Dollar > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 105698441.00 |=========================================


Redis 4.0.8
Test: GET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 1206140.85 |===========================================


Redis 4.0.8
Performance / Cost - Test: GET
Requests Per Second Per Dollar > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 120614085.00 |=========================================


Sysbench 2018-07-28
Test: CPU
Events Per Second > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 22659.64 |=============================================


Sysbench 2018-07-28
Performance / Cost - Test: CPU
Events Per Second Per Dollar > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 2265964.00 |===========================================


PHPBench 0.8.1
PHP Benchmark Suite
Score > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 357260 |===============================================


PHPBench 0.8.1
Performance / Cost - PHP Benchmark Suite
Score Per Dollar > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 11908666.67 |==========================================


PyBench 2018-02-16
Total For Average Test Times
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 2542 |=================================================


PyBench 2018-02-16
Performance / Cost - Total For Average Test Times
Milliseconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 127.10 |===============================================


PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3
Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 2425.04 |==============================================


PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3
Performance / Cost - Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write
TPS Per Dollar > Higher Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 17321.71 |=============================================


Cost To Run Tests
Cost / Price Per Hour
Cost / Price Per Hour < Lower Is Better
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic . 2.00 |=================================================