sim206 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 testing with a HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9 (P89 BIOS) and Matrox s MGA G200EH on RedHatEnterpriseServer 6.6 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz (24 Cores), Motherboard: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9 (P89 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 259072MB, Disk: 300GB LOGICAL VOLUME, Graphics: Matrox s MGA G200EH, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5719 Gigabit PCIe OS: RedHatEnterpriseServer 6.6, Kernel: 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.15.0, Display Driver: modesetting 0.8.0, Compiler: GCC 4.4.7 20120313 + PGI Compiler + PGI C-C++ Workstation, File-System: nfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 2: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz (24 Cores), Motherboard: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9 (P89 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 259072MB, Disk: 300GB LOGICAL VOLUME, Graphics: Matrox s MGA G200EH, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5719 Gigabit PCIe OS: RedHatEnterpriseServer 6.6, Kernel: 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.15.0, Display Driver: modesetting 0.8.0, Compiler: GCC 4.4.7 20120313 + PGI Compiler + PGI C-C++ Workstation, File-System: nfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 3: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz (24 Cores), Motherboard: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9 (P89 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 259072MB, Disk: 300GB LOGICAL VOLUME, Graphics: Matrox s MGA G200EH, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5719 Gigabit PCIe OS: RedHatEnterpriseServer 6.6, Kernel: 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.15.0, Display Driver: modesetting 0.8.0, Compiler: GCC 4.4.7 20120313 + PGI Compiler + PGI C-C++ Workstation, File-System: nfs Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 71815.48 |============================================ 2 . 71836.62 |============================================ 3 . 103876.75 |================================================================ Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 71233.48 |============================================== 2 . 71237.90 |============================================== 3 . 100059.22 |================================================================ Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 81221.10 |============================================== 2 . 81045.66 |============================================== 3 . 113639.26 |================================================================ Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 80910.68 |========================================== 2 . 80954.70 |========================================== 3 . 122393.52 |================================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better 1 . 535.33 |=========================================================== 2 . 534.15 |=========================================================== 3 . 606.15 |=================================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better 1 . 109.57 |=========================================================== 2 . 109.57 |=========================================================== 3 . 125.05 |=================================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better 1 . 276.01 |=================================================================== 2 . 276.31 |=================================================================== 3 . 269.10 |================================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better 1 . 561.10 |======================================================== 2 . 560.07 |======================================================== 3 . 673.68 |=================================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better 1 . 744.19 |====================================================== 2 . 744.19 |====================================================== 3 . 915.33 |=================================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better 1 . 985.81 |============================================================== 2 . 980.61 |============================================================== 3 . 1047.56 |================================================================== Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 6378055 |======================================================= 2 . 6368651 |======================================================= 3 . 7637423 |==================================================================