Intel Core i7 Ubuntu Linux
Intel Xeon W3680 testing with a HP 0B4Ch (786G3 v03.15 BIOS) and NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 256MB on Fedora 26 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Core i7 5775C: 

	Processor: Intel Core i7-5775C @ 3.70GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: MSI Z97-G45 GAMING (MS-7821) v1.0 (V2.9 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Broadwell-U- DMI, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB CT120BX100SSD1, Graphics: Intel Iris Pro 6200 (1150MHz), Audio: Intel Broadwell-U Audio, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Qualcomm Atheros Killer E220x Gigabit

	OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.15.0-20-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.1, Display Driver: modesetting 1.19.6, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 18.2.0-devel, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

Xeon W3680: 

	Processor: Intel Xeon W3680 @ 3.33GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: HP 0B4Ch (786G3 v03.15 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 5520/5500/X58 + ICH10R, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 4001GB TOSHIBA MD04ACA4 + 8002GB Seagate ST8000VN0022-2EL + 250GB Samsung SSD 750 + 4001GB Western Digital WD40EFRX-68N + 2 x 60GB OCZ REVODRIVE, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 256MB, Audio: Realtek ALC262, Network: Broadcom Limited NetXtreme BCM5764M Gigabit PCIe

	OS: Fedora 26, Kernel: 4.15.17-200.fc26.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Driver: modesetting 0.8.0, File-System: ext4


PolyBench-C 4.2
Test: Covariance Computation
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 3.66  |=================
Xeon W3680 .... 11.85 |========================================================


PolyBench-C 4.2
Test: Correlation Computation
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 3.64  |=================
Xeon W3680 .... 11.72 |========================================================


PolyBench-C 4.2
Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 4.43  |=============
Xeon W3680 .... 19.50 |========================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 606.54 |=======================================================
Xeon W3680 .... 395.13 |====================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 128.75 |=======================================================
Xeon W3680 .... 90.82  |=======================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 237.89 |=======================================================
Xeon W3680 .... 121.94 |============================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 635.91 |=======================================================
Xeon W3680 .... 403.11 |===================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 809.58 |=======================================================
Xeon W3680 .... 478.50 |=================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 1220.58 |======================================================
Xeon W3680 .... 881.29  |=======================================


Botan 2.6.0
Test: KASUMI  - Encrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 81.06 |========================================================
Xeon W3680 .... 39.68 |===========================


Botan 2.6.0
Test: KASUMI  - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 78.73 |========================================================


Botan 2.6.0
Test: AES-256  - Encrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 3285.97 |======================================================
Xeon W3680 .... 1792.20 |=============================


Botan 2.6.0
Test: AES-256  - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 3279.98 |======================================================


Botan 2.6.0
Test: Twofish  - Encrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 320.79 |=======================================================
Xeon W3680 .... 232.84 |========================================


Botan 2.6.0
Test: Twofish  - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 315.86 |=======================================================


Botan 2.6.0
Test: Blowfish  - Encrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 240.13 |=======================================================
Xeon W3680 .... 191.55 |============================================


Botan 2.6.0
Test: Blowfish  - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 239.38 |=======================================================


Botan 2.6.0
Test: CAST-256  - Encrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 121.74 |=======================================================
Xeon W3680 .... 101.37 |==============================================


Botan 2.6.0
Test: CAST-256  - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 121.82 |=======================================================


Stockfish 9
Total Time
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 10297964 |=========================================
Xeon W3680 .... 13157115 |=====================================================


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: cos
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 139102 |===============================
Xeon W3680 .... 246445 |=======================================================


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: ffs
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 5.43 |==========================================
Xeon W3680 .... 7.45 |=========================================================


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: sin
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 147800 |================================
Xeon W3680 .... 256534 |=======================================================


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: sqrt
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 15.32 |======================================
Xeon W3680 .... 22.79 |========================================================


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: tanh
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 43.22 |==============================
Xeon W3680 .... 79.67 |========================================================


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: ffsll
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 6.26 |================================================
Xeon W3680 .... 7.49 |=========================================================


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: pthread_once
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 6.27 |==========================================
Xeon W3680 .... 8.51 |=========================================================


PyBench 2018-02-16
Total For Average Test Times
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 1513 |======================================
Xeon W3680 .... 2262 |=========================================================


PHPBench 0.8.1
PHP Benchmark Suite
Score > Higher Is Better
Core i7 5775C . 568052 |=======================================================
Xeon W3680 .... 328885 |================================


Botan 2.6.0
Test: KASUMI  - Encrypt  - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Xeon W3680 . 39.08 |===========================================================


Botan 2.6.0
Test: AES-256  - Encrypt  - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Xeon W3680 . 1795.79 |=========================================================


Botan 2.6.0
Test: Twofish  - Encrypt  - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Xeon W3680 . 237.68 |==========================================================


Botan 2.6.0
Test: Blowfish  - Encrypt  - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Xeon W3680 . 187.71 |==========================================================


Botan 2.6.0
Test: CAST-256  - Encrypt  - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Xeon W3680 . 101.47 |==========================================================