Windows 10 AMD Ryzen Radeon
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core testing with a MSI B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34) and AMD Radeon RX 480 4095MB on Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Build 16299 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO: 

	Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core @ 3.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: MSI B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34), Memory: 2 x 8192 MB 1467MHz Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15, Disk: 112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO 120GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 480 4095MB, Network: Realtek PCIe GBE Family

	OS: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Build 16299, Kernel: 10.0 (x86_64), Display Driver: 23.20.15033.5003, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (2527.10), Compiler: GCC 7.1.0, File-System: NTFS, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160


Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 10 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 334.64 |===========================================


Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 10 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
IOPS > Higher Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 85668.12 |=========================================


Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 20 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 358.30 |===========================================


Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 20 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
IOPS > Higher Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 91724.47 |=========================================


Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 40 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 298.93 |===========================================


Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 40 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
IOPS > Higher Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 76525.55 |=========================================


Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 266.46 |===========================================


Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
IOPS > Higher Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 68213.72 |=========================================


Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 60 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 240.64 |===========================================


Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 60 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
IOPS > Higher Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 61602.77 |=========================================


Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 80 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 183.19 |===========================================


Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 80 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
IOPS > Higher Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 46896.76 |=========================================


Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 350.54 |===========================================


Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
IOPS > Higher Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 89736.87 |=========================================


Y-Cruncher 0.7.5.9481
Calculating 500M Pi Digits
Seconds < Lower Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 44.12 |============================================


Euler3D
CFD Cycle Frequency
Hz > Higher Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 7.60 |=============================================


Darktable 2.4.1
Test: Boat - Acceleration: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 0.46 |=============================================


Darktable 2.4.1
Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 0.67 |=============================================


Darktable 2.4.1
Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 0.50 |=============================================


Darktable 2.4.1
Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 0.81 |=============================================


Darktable 2.4.1
Test: Server Room - Acceleration: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 0.50 |=============================================


Darktable 2.4.1
Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 0.81 |=============================================


GIMP 2.9.8
Test: resize
Seconds < Lower Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 20.40 |============================================


GIMP 2.9.8
Test: auto-levels
Seconds < Lower Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 20.27 |============================================


GIMP 2.9.8
Test: unsharp-mask
Seconds < Lower Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 24.79 |============================================


WinSAT
Test: Disk
MB/s > Higher Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 185.99 |===========================================


WinSAT
Test: Memory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 32027.11 |=========================================


Maxon Cinebench 15.038
Test: OpenGL Test
fps > Higher Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 91.09 |============================================


Maxon Cinebench 15.038
Test: Multi-Core Test
pts > Higher Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 1434.87 |==========================================


Maxon Cinebench 15.038
Test: Single-Core Test
pts > Higher Is Better
112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO . 145.62 |===========================================