AMD EPYC + NVIDIA GPU Tests AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core testing with a GIGABYTE MZ31-AR0-00 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8192MB on Microsoft Windows Server 2016 Essentials Build 14393 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1803084-PTS-AMDEPYCN59 .
AMD EPYC + NVIDIA GPU Tests Processor Motherboard Memory Disk Graphics Network OS Kernel Display Driver Vulkan Compiler File-System Screen Resolution Windows Server 2016 AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core @ 2.00GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads) GIGABYTE MZ31-AR0-00 8 x 4096 MB 2666MHz 9ASF51272PZ-2G6E1 466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO 500GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8192MB (1911/4004MHz) Realtek PCIe GBE Family + Microsoft ISATAP Microsoft Windows Server 2016 Essentials Build 14393 10.0 (x86_64) 391.01 (23.21.13.9101) 1.0.65 GCC 7.1.0 NTFS 2560x1440 OpenBenchmarking.org - python is not recognized as an internal or external command operable program or batch file.
AMD EPYC + NVIDIA GPU Tests unigine-heaven: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen unigine-heaven: 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen xonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Low xonotic: 2560 x 1440 - High xonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Ultra xonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Ultimate darktable: Boat - OpenCL darktable: Masskrug - OpenCL darktable: Server Room - OpenCL fahbench: luxmark: GPU - Hotel luxmark: GPU - Microphone luxmark: GPU - Luxball HDR openarena: 1920 x 1080 openarena: 2560 x 1440 j2dbench: Text Rendering j2dbench: Image Rendering j2dbench: All Rendering Tests j2dbench: Vector Graphics Rendering gputest: GiMark - 1920 x 1080 - Windowed gputest: GiMark - 2560 x 1440 - Windowed gputest: Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Windowed gputest: Plot3D - 2560 x 1440 - Windowed gputest: Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - Windowed gputest: Furmark - 2560 x 1440 - Windowed gputest: GiMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen gputest: GiMark - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen gputest: Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen gputest: Plot3D - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen gputest: TessMark - 1920 x 1080 - Windowed gputest: TessMark - 2560 x 1440 - Windowed gputest: Triangle - 1920 x 1080 - Windowed gputest: Triangle - 2560 x 1440 - Windowed gputest: Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen gputest: Furmark - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen gputest: TessMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen gputest: TessMark - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen gputest: Triangle - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen gputest: Triangle - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen gputest: Pixmark Piano - 1920 x 1080 - Windowed gputest: Pixmark Piano - 2560 x 1440 - Windowed gputest: Pixmark Piano - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen gputest: Pixmark Piano - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen gputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 1920 x 1080 - Windowed gputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 2560 x 1440 - Windowed gputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen gputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen paraview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Many Spheres - 2560 x 1440 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 2560 x 1440 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 2560 x 1440 Windows Server 2016 106.04 79.83 214.44 169.21 142.00 102.73 5.80 5.15 5.19 62.05 4450 10077 16522 134.83 161.80 4747.80 13488473.04 8616129.50 8561555.78 8506 7808 132020 107811 8119 5902 8505 7992 104547 93864 24897 19317 150668 196191 7178 5006 25114 20395 156580 167867 2383 1396 2441 1402 8017 4639 8341 4818 50.07 35.71 62.35 57.13 64.02 53.57 OpenBenchmarking.org
Unigine Heaven Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen Windows Server 2016 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.08, N = 3 106.04
Unigine Heaven Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen Windows Server 2016 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.10, N = 3 79.83
Xonotic Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Low OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Low Windows Server 2016 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.65, N = 3 214.44 MIN: 106 / MAX: 431
Xonotic Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: High Windows Server 2016 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.77, N = 3 169.21 MIN: 61 / MAX: 385
Xonotic Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Ultra Windows Server 2016 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.01, N = 6 142.00 MIN: 47 / MAX: 380
Xonotic Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Ultimate OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Windows Server 2016 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.45, N = 3 102.73 MIN: 9 / MAX: 287
Darktable Test: Boat - Acceleration: OpenCL OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.1 Test: Boat - Acceleration: OpenCL Windows Server 2016 1.305 2.61 3.915 5.22 6.525 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 5.80
Darktable Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: OpenCL OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.1 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: OpenCL Windows Server 2016 1.1588 2.3176 3.4764 4.6352 5.794 SE +/- 0.26, N = 6 5.15
Darktable Test: Server Room - Acceleration: OpenCL OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.1 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: OpenCL Windows Server 2016 1.1678 2.3356 3.5034 4.6712 5.839 SE +/- 0.10, N = 6 5.19
FAHBench OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Day, More Is Better FAHBench 2.3.2 Windows Server 2016 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 62.05
LuxMark OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Hotel OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Hotel Windows Server 2016 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 12.50, N = 3 4450
LuxMark OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Microphone OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Microphone Windows Server 2016 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 44.96, N = 3 10077
LuxMark OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR Windows Server 2016 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 16.29, N = 3 16522
OpenArena Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Windows Server 2016 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 12.11, N = 6 134.83 MIN: 2
OpenArena Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame Time OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame Time Windows Server 2016 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 2 / Avg: 9.11 / Max: 92
OpenArena Resolution: 2560 x 1440 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Windows Server 2016 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.70, N = 3 161.80 MIN: 2 / MAX: 221
OpenArena Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Total Frame Time OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Total Frame Time Windows Server 2016 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 2 / Avg: 5.96 / Max: 28
Java 2D Microbenchmark Rendering Test: Text Rendering OpenBenchmarking.org Units Per Second, More Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: Text Rendering Windows Server 2016 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 6.31, N = 4 4747.80
Java 2D Microbenchmark Rendering Test: Image Rendering OpenBenchmarking.org Units Per Second, More Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: Image Rendering Windows Server 2016 3M 6M 9M 12M 15M SE +/- 113314.24, N = 4 13488473.04
Java 2D Microbenchmark Rendering Test: All Rendering Tests OpenBenchmarking.org Units Per Second, More Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: All Rendering Tests Windows Server 2016 2M 4M 6M 8M 10M SE +/- 134270.60, N = 5 8616129.50
Java 2D Microbenchmark Rendering Test: Vector Graphics Rendering OpenBenchmarking.org Units Per Second, More Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: Vector Graphics Rendering Windows Server 2016 2M 4M 6M 8M 10M SE +/- 134969.73, N = 4 8561555.78
GpuTest Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed Windows Server 2016 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 30.02, N = 3 8506
GpuTest Test: GiMark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Windowed OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Windowed Windows Server 2016 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 12.55, N = 3 7808
GpuTest Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed Windows Server 2016 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 108.37, N = 3 132020
GpuTest Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Windowed OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Windowed Windows Server 2016 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 67.22, N = 3 107811
GpuTest Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed Windows Server 2016 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 3.76, N = 3 8119
GpuTest Test: Furmark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Windowed OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Windowed Windows Server 2016 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 10.35, N = 3 5902
GpuTest Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen Windows Server 2016 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 62.00, N = 3 8505
GpuTest Test: GiMark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen Windows Server 2016 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 5.51, N = 3 7992
GpuTest Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen Windows Server 2016 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 113.49, N = 3 104547
GpuTest Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen Windows Server 2016 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 27.85, N = 3 93864
GpuTest Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed Windows Server 2016 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 87.61, N = 3 24897
GpuTest Test: TessMark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Windowed OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Windowed Windows Server 2016 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 34.95, N = 3 19317
GpuTest Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed Windows Server 2016 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 208.39, N = 3 150668
GpuTest Test: Triangle - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Windowed OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Windowed Windows Server 2016 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 6811.15, N = 6 196191
GpuTest Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen Windows Server 2016 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 3.28, N = 3 7178
GpuTest Test: Furmark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen Windows Server 2016 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 5006
GpuTest Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen Windows Server 2016 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 34.71, N = 3 25114
GpuTest Test: TessMark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen Windows Server 2016 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 26.43, N = 3 20395
GpuTest Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen Windows Server 2016 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 488.88, N = 3 156580
GpuTest Test: Triangle - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen Windows Server 2016 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 386.11, N = 3 167867
GpuTest Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed Windows Server 2016 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 7.75, N = 3 2383
GpuTest Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Windowed OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Windowed Windows Server 2016 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 3.18, N = 3 1396
GpuTest Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen Windows Server 2016 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 2.40, N = 3 2441
GpuTest Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen Windows Server 2016 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 1402
GpuTest Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed Windows Server 2016 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 25.63, N = 3 8017
GpuTest Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Windowed OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Windowed Windows Server 2016 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 9.56, N = 3 4639
GpuTest Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen Windows Server 2016 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 13.20, N = 3 8341
GpuTest Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen Windows Server 2016 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 11.70, N = 3 4818
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Windows Server 2016 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 1.82, N = 6 50.07
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Windows Server 2016 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 182.37, N = 6 5019.27
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Windows Server 2016 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.40, N = 3 35.71
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Windows Server 2016 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 39.43, N = 3 3579.93
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Windows Server 2016 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 1.28, N = 6 62.35
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Windows Server 2016 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 20.49, N = 6 997.62
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Windows Server 2016 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 3.16, N = 6 57.13
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Windows Server 2016 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 50.56, N = 6 914.09
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Windows Server 2016 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 64.02
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Windows Server 2016 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 667.14
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Windows Server 2016 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.99, N = 3 53.57
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Windows Server 2016 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 10.29, N = 3 558.32
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4