Kernel Linux Scheduler Benchmarks Intel Atom C3950 testing on Ubuntu 17.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Intel Atom C3950: Processor: Intel Atom C3950 @ 1.70GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: TYAN \z (V1.00 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 1980, Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 240GB OCZ ARC100, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 17.10, Kernel: 4.15.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20180206, Compiler: GCC 7.2.0, File-System: ext4 Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 10.19 |===================================================== Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 17.88 |===================================================== Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 32.81 |===================================================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 63.14 |===================================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 9.60 |====================================================== Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 124.67 |==================================================== Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 16.20 |===================================================== Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 30.41 |===================================================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 57.79 |===================================================== Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 116.98 |==================================================== Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 233.01 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 88 |======================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 87 |======================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 92 |======================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 562 |======================================================= Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 70 |======================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 4309 |====================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 21909 |===================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 30048 |===================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 70 |======================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 18613 |===================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 31371 |===================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 38037 |===================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 4918 |====================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 28021 |===================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 37397 |===================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 45717 |===================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 24309 |===================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 43499 |===================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 63253 |===================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 109013 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 35051 |===================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 42432 |===================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 54933 |===================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 41579 |===================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 107392 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 152576 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 149419 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 49771 |===================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 85632 |===================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 110037 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 84181 |===================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 113963 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 134229 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 105344 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 124288 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 141056 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 131243 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 188672 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 256597 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 258133 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 427861 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better Intel Atom C3950 . 584704 |====================================================