test4
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 testing with a Huawei BC11HGSA0 and VESA VGA on Ubuntu 16.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4: 

	Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 @ 3.50GHz (56 Cores), Motherboard: Huawei BC11HGSA0, Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v4/Xeon, Memory: 7.875 x 32768 MB DRAM-2400MHz Micron, Disk: 5997GB LSI + 479GB LSI, Graphics: VESA VGA, Network: Intel 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+

	OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.4.0-87-generic (x86_64), Display Driver: modesetting 1.18.4, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609 + CUDA 8.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 640x480


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 . 443.28 |===============================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 . 86.59 |================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 . 228.80 |===============================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 . 450.93 |===============================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 . 586.29 |===============================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 . 863.79 |===============================================