znkl-desktop-gaming-monster-201709

Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 testing with a ASUS Z9PE-D8 WS and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4096MB on Ubuntu 17.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1709129-TR-ZNKLDESKT12
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Desktop Graphics 4 Tests
OpenGL Demos Test Suite 2 Tests
Unigine Test Suite 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
20170911-202729
September 11 2017
 
20170912-100958
September 12 2017
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


znkl-desktop-gaming-monster-201709ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLVulkanCompilerFile-SystemScreen Resolution20170911-20272920170912-100958Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 @ 2.80GHz (12 Cores)ASUS Z9PE-D8 WSIntel Xeon E5/Core16384MB250GB Samsung SSD 850 + 120GB OCZ AGILITY3 + 2000GB Western Digital WD20EZRX-00D + 1000GB Hitachi HDS72101NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4096MB (1151/3505MHz)Realtek ALC898Intel 82574L Gigabit ConnectionUbuntu 16.044.11.0-14-generic (x86_64)Unity 7.4.0X Server 1.19.3NVIDIA 381.224.5.01.0.54GCC 5.4.0 20160609ext42560x1440Ubuntu 17.04Unity 7.5.0NVIDIA 384.69GCC 6.3.0 20170406OpenBenchmarking.orgProcessor Details- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave

20170911-202729 vs. 20170912-100958 ComparisonPhoronix Test SuiteBaseline+13.6%+13.6%+27.2%+27.2%+40.8%+40.8%6.2%4.5%2560 x 1440 - Windowed - Extreme54.2%2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen - Extreme22.4%2560 x 1440 - No - On2560 x 14402560 x 14403.5%2560 x 1440 - Yes - Off3.1%2560 x 1440 - Yes - On2.2%Unigine SuperpositionUnigine SuperpositionNexuizOpenArenaTesseractNexuizNexuiz20170911-20272920170912-100958

znkl-desktop-gaming-monster-201709tesseract: 2560 x 1440unigine-super: 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen - Extremeopenarena: 2560 x 1440unigine-valley: 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreenunigine-super: 2560 x 1440 - Windowed - Extremenexuiz: 2560 x 1440 - Yes - Offnexuiz: 2560 x 1440 - Yes - Onunigine-valley: 2560 x 1440 - Windowednexuiz: 2560 x 1440 - No - Onnexuiz: 2560 x 1440 - No - Offxonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Ultimate20170911-20272920170912-100958196.9241.60228.6348.8242.40139.16132.7049.00180.29205.06135.46190.2334239.0049.1427.50135.03129.8249.35191.44206.04136.30OpenBenchmarking.org

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2560 x 144020170911-20272920170912-1009584080120160200SE +/- 0.32, N = 3SE +/- 2.67, N = 3196.92190.23
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2560 x 144020170911-20272920170912-1009584080120160200Min: 196.28 / Avg: 196.92 / Max: 197.28Min: 185.44 / Avg: 190.23 / Max: 194.68

Unigine Superposition

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL GL3 Core Profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Extreme20170911-20272920170912-10095891827364541.6034.00MAX: 51.7MAX: 40.4

OpenArena

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 144020170911-20272920170912-10095850100150200250SE +/- 1.13, N = 3SE +/- 1.05, N = 3228.63239.00MIN: 1MIN: 2
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 144020170911-20272920170912-1009584080120160200Min: 226.4 / Avg: 228.63 / Max: 230.1Min: 237.8 / Avg: 239 / Max: 241.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Total Frame Time20170911-20272920170912-1009581122334455Min: 1 / Avg: 4.39 / Max: 54Min: 1 / Avg: 4.18 / Max: 52

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL GL3 Core Profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen20170911-20272920170912-1009581122334455SE +/- 0.23, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 348.8249.14
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen20170911-20272920170912-1009581020304050Min: 48.37 / Avg: 48.82 / Max: 49.11Min: 49.03 / Avg: 49.14 / Max: 49.24

Unigine Superposition

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL GL3 Core Profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Windowed - Quality: Extreme20170911-20272920170912-100958102030405042.4027.50MAX: 52.9MAX: 34.7

Nexuiz

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterNexuiz 2.5.2Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - HDR: Yes - Sound: Off20170911-20272920170912-100958306090120150SE +/- 2.02, N = 3SE +/- 1.17, N = 3139.16135.03MIN: 69 / MAX: 540MIN: 68 / MAX: 537
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterNexuiz 2.5.2Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - HDR: Yes - Sound: Off20170911-20272920170912-100958306090120150Min: 135.53 / Avg: 139.16 / Max: 142.52Min: 133.08 / Avg: 135.03 / Max: 137.11

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterNexuiz 2.5.2Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - HDR: Yes - Sound: On20170911-20272920170912-100958306090120150SE +/- 1.92, N = 3SE +/- 0.91, N = 3132.70129.82MIN: 71 / MAX: 462MIN: 68 / MAX: 460
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterNexuiz 2.5.2Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - HDR: Yes - Sound: On20170911-20272920170912-10095820406080100Min: 128.99 / Avg: 132.7 / Max: 135.41Min: 128.01 / Avg: 129.82 / Max: 130.96

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL GL3 Core Profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Windowed20170911-20272920170912-1009581122334455SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 349.0049.35
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Windowed20170911-20272920170912-1009581020304050Min: 48.8 / Avg: 49 / Max: 49.18Min: 49.26 / Avg: 49.35 / Max: 49.45

Nexuiz

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterNexuiz 2.5.2Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - HDR: No - Sound: On20170911-20272920170912-1009584080120160200SE +/- 0.46, N = 3SE +/- 1.35, N = 3180.29191.44MIN: 90 / MAX: 563MIN: 105 / MAX: 568
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterNexuiz 2.5.2Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - HDR: No - Sound: On20170911-20272920170912-1009584080120160200Min: 179.48 / Avg: 180.29 / Max: 181.09Min: 188.9 / Avg: 191.44 / Max: 193.48

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterNexuiz 2.5.2Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - HDR: No - Sound: Off20170911-20272920170912-10095850100150200250SE +/- 3.91, N = 3SE +/- 0.57, N = 3205.06206.04MIN: 102 / MAX: 625MIN: 113 / MAX: 609
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterNexuiz 2.5.2Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - HDR: No - Sound: Off20170911-20272920170912-1009584080120160200Min: 198.05 / Avg: 205.06 / Max: 211.57Min: 205.1 / Avg: 206.04 / Max: 207.08

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Ultimate20170911-20272920170912-100958306090120150SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.32, N = 3135.46136.30MIN: 24 / MAX: 301MIN: 25 / MAX: 304
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Ultimate20170911-20272920170912-100958306090120150Min: 134.88 / Avg: 135.46 / Max: 136.04Min: 135.66 / Avg: 136.3 / Max: 136.65