Radeon RX 550 Monitoring Intel Core i7-7700K testing with a MSI Z270-A PRO (MS-7A71) v1.0 and eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4096MB on Ubuntu 16.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1705070-TR-MONITOR8689 .
Radeon RX 550 Monitoring Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Monitor Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server OpenGL Vulkan Compiler File-System Screen Resolution Display Driver AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 DRM-Next 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.50GHz (8 Cores) MSI Z270-A PRO (MS-7A71) v1.0 Intel Device 591f + Z270 16384MB 525GB Crucial_CT525MX3 + Samsung SSD 950 PRO 256GB Gigabyte AMD Radeon 500 2048MB Realtek ALC892 Acer B286HK Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 Ubuntu 16.04 4.8.0-51-generic (x86_64) Unity 7.4.0 X Server 1.18.4 4.5.13474 1.0.21 GCC 5.4.0 20160609 ext4 1920x1080 Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 550 2048MB 4.11.0-996-generic (x86_64) 20170504 modesetting 1.18.4 4.5 Mesa 17.2.0-devel (git-69e6eab) Gallium 0.4 (LLVM 5.0.0) OpenBenchmarking.org Processor Details - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave Graphics Details - AMDGPU-PRO 17.10: GLAMOR
Radeon RX 550 Monitoring csgo: 1920 x 1080 dota2: 1920 x 1080 - OpenGL unigine-super: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Low AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 DRM-Next 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev 59.96 31.83 16.40 118.05 62.50 29.60 OpenBenchmarking.org
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive Resolution: 1920 x 1080 AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 DRM-Next 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 59.96 118.05
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 DRM-Next 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev 0.2993 0.5986 0.8979 1.1972 1.4965 0.67 1.33 1. $89 reported cost.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive Resolution: 1920 x 1080 AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 DRM-Next 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev 0.324 0.648 0.972 1.296 1.62 0.75 1.44
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive GPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 33.0 36.7 39.0 DRM-Next 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev 29.0 38.5 46.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive GPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 45.3 80.2 92.5 DRM-Next 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev 32.5 81.8 123.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive System Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Dota 2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGL OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Dota 2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGL AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 DRM-Next 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 31.83 62.50
Dota 2 Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGL OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is Better Dota 2 Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGL AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 DRM-Next 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev 0.1575 0.315 0.4725 0.63 0.7875 0.36 0.70 1. $89 reported cost.
Dota 2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGL OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Dota 2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGL AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 DRM-Next 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev 0.1238 0.2476 0.3714 0.4952 0.619 0.36 0.55
Dota 2 GPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 36.0 38.3 40.0 DRM-Next 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev 34.0 46.3 51.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Dota 2 GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Dota 2 System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 45.1 87.8 97.1 DRM-Next 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev 32.7 112.8 134.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Dota 2 System Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Unigine Superposition Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 DRM-Next 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev 7 14 21 28 35 16.40 29.60 MAX: 20.9 MAX: 38.3
Unigine Superposition Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 DRM-Next 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev 0.0743 0.1486 0.2229 0.2972 0.3715 0.18 0.33 1. $89 reported cost.
Unigine Superposition Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 DRM-Next 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev 0.081 0.162 0.243 0.324 0.405 0.28 0.36
Unigine Superposition GPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 37.0 39.2 40.0 DRM-Next 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev 36.0 48.9 54.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Unigine Superposition System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 44.3 57.8 75.2 DRM-Next 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev 65.0 81.5 83.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Meta Performance Per Dollar Performance Per Dollar OpenBenchmarking.org Performance Per Dollar, More Is Better Meta Performance Per Dollar Performance Per Dollar AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 DRM-Next 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev 0.1778 0.3556 0.5334 0.7112 0.889 0.41 0.79 1. AMDGPU-PRO 17.10: $89 reported value. Average result: 36.06. 2. DRM-Next 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev: $89 reported value. Average result: 70.05.
Meta Performance Per Watt Performance Per Watt OpenBenchmarking.org Performance Per Watt, More Is Better Meta Performance Per Watt Performance Per Watt AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 DRM-Next 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev 16 32 48 64 80 36.06 70.05
GPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Min Avg Max AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 33.0 37.8 40.0 DRM-Next 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev 29.0 43.9 54.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius GPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring 15 30 45 60 75
System Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Min Avg Max AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 44.2 72.7 97.1 DRM-Next 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev 32.5 86.3 134.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts System Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring 40 80 120 160 200
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4