NVIDIA-970m
Intel Core i7-6700HQ testing with a Terrans Force X411 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M 3072MB on Ubuntu 16.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M: 

	Processor: Intel Core i7-6700HQ @ 3.50GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Terrans Force X411, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 500GB HGST HTS725050A7 + 256GB SAMSUNG MZHPU256, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M 3072MB (135/324MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel Wireless 3165

	OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.4.0-43-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Xfce 4.12, Display Driver: NVIDIA 375.26, OpenGL: 4.5.0, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609 + CUDA 8.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10
Target: CUDA - Benchmark: Triad
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M . 15.49 |==============================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10
Target: CUDA - Benchmark: FFT SP
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M . 270.09 |=============================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10
Target: CUDA - Benchmark: MD5 Hash
GHash/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M . 3.93 |===============================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10
Target: CUDA - Benchmark: Max SP Flops
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M . 2579.22 |============================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10
Target: CUDA - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M . 12.97 |==============================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10
Target: CUDA - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M . 13.02 |==============================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10
Target: CUDA - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M . 271.16 |=============================================


ASKAP tConvolveCuda 2015-11-10
Processing: Gridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M . 3415.04 |============================================


ASKAP tConvolveCuda 2015-11-10
Processing: Degridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M . 6098.18 |============================================


CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10
Test: Original
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M . 74.34 |==============================================


CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10
Test: Cache Blocking
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M . 42.58 |==============================================


CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10
Test: Loop Unrolling
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M . 41.78 |==============================================


CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10
Test: SOA Data Layout
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M . 94.09 |==============================================


CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10
Test: Flush Denormals To Zero
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M . 94.29 |==============================================