Ubuntu-1604PC

Comparison between Nvidia 367 vs 375 drivers. Running pts/openarena-1.5.3, pts/tesseract-1.1.0, pts/unigine-valley-1.1.4, pts/xonotic-1.4.0, pts/gputest-1.3.1 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1702198-KH-1702198KH66
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Feb18-2017-409pm
February 18 2017
 
Ubuntu-1604PC-367vs375
February 19 2017
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Ubuntu-1604PCOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteAMD FX-6100 Six-Core @ 3.30GHz (6 Cores)ASUS M5A97 EVOAMD RD890 bridge16384MB240GB OCZ TRION100 + 3001GB Seagate ST3000DM001-1ER1 + 2016GB Western Digital WD20E12X-00M + 1000GB Seagate ST31000524ASGigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2048MB (721/810MHz)Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2048MB (1215/3505MHz)Realtek ALC892Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411Ubuntu 16.044.4.0-62-generic (x86_64)Unity 7.4.0X Server 1.18.4NVIDIA 367.57NVIDIA 375.39GCC 5.4.0 20160609ext41920x1080ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriversCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionUbuntu-1604PC BenchmarksSystem Logs- Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand

Feb18-2017-409pm vs. Ubuntu-1604PC-367vs375 ComparisonPhoronix Test SuiteBaseline+8.5%+8.5%+17%+17%+25.5%+25.5%33.9%10.2%9.6%8.1%7.3%4.7%1920 x 1080 - FullscreenPlot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Windowed1920 x 1080 - Ultimate1920 x 10801920 x 1080 - WindowedPlot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen1920 x 10802.5%Unigine ValleyGpuTestXonoticOpenArenaUnigine ValleyGpuTestTesseractFeb18-2017-409pmUbuntu-1604PC-367vs375

Ubuntu-1604PCopenarena: 1920 x 1080tesseract: 1920 x 1080unigine-valley: 1920 x 1080 - Windowedunigine-valley: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreenxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultimategputest: Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Windowedgputest: Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - FullscreenFeb18-2017-409pmUbuntu-1604PC-367vs375207.30186.6441.3735.33122.005788761783224.00182.1244.3747.29133.666381064658OpenBenchmarking.org

OpenArena

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080Feb18-2017-409pmUbuntu-1604PC-367vs37550100150200250SE +/- 0.47, N = 3SE +/- 1.65, N = 3207.30224.00MIN: 1MIN: 1
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080Feb18-2017-409pmUbuntu-1604PC-367vs3754080120160200Min: 206.4 / Avg: 207.3 / Max: 208Min: 221.3 / Avg: 224 / Max: 227

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame TimeFeb18-2017-409pmUbuntu-1604PC-367vs3751632486480Min: 1 / Avg: 4.78 / Max: 86Min: 1 / Avg: 4.48 / Max: 22

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080Feb18-2017-409pmUbuntu-1604PC-367vs3754080120160200SE +/- 1.36, N = 3SE +/- 1.73, N = 3186.64182.12
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080Feb18-2017-409pmUbuntu-1604PC-367vs375306090120150Min: 184.92 / Avg: 186.64 / Max: 189.32Min: 179.97 / Avg: 182.12 / Max: 185.53

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL GL3 Core Profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: WindowedFeb18-2017-409pmUbuntu-1604PC-367vs3751020304050SE +/- 0.29, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 341.3744.37
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: WindowedFeb18-2017-409pmUbuntu-1604PC-367vs375918273645Min: 40.89 / Avg: 41.37 / Max: 41.9Min: 44.28 / Avg: 44.37 / Max: 44.42

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenFeb18-2017-409pmUbuntu-1604PC-367vs3751122334455SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 335.3347.29
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenFeb18-2017-409pmUbuntu-1604PC-367vs3751020304050Min: 35.18 / Avg: 35.33 / Max: 35.45Min: 47.12 / Avg: 47.29 / Max: 47.44

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateFeb18-2017-409pmUbuntu-1604PC-367vs375306090120150SE +/- 0.32, N = 3SE +/- 0.64, N = 3122.00133.66MIN: 21 / MAX: 300MIN: 29 / MAX: 322
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateFeb18-2017-409pmUbuntu-1604PC-367vs375306090120150Min: 121.55 / Avg: 122 / Max: 122.62Min: 132.38 / Avg: 133.66 / Max: 134.35

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: WindowedFeb18-2017-409pmUbuntu-1604PC-367vs37514K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 81.25, N = 3SE +/- 224.57, N = 35788763810
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: WindowedFeb18-2017-409pmUbuntu-1604PC-367vs37511K22K33K44K55KMin: 57795 / Avg: 57887 / Max: 58049Min: 63442 / Avg: 63810 / Max: 64217

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenFeb18-2017-409pmUbuntu-1604PC-367vs37514K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 136.03, N = 3SE +/- 354.77, N = 36178364658
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenFeb18-2017-409pmUbuntu-1604PC-367vs37511K22K33K44K55KMin: 61562 / Avg: 61783.33 / Max: 62031Min: 64017 / Avg: 64658 / Max: 65242