HUKR200 Intel Xeon X3350 testing with a Dell 0TY019 and AMD ES1000 on Ubuntu 16.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. HUKR200: Processor: Intel Xeon X3350 @ 2.67GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Dell 0TY019, Chipset: Intel 3200/3210 + ICH9R, Memory: 4 x 2048 MB DDR2-667MHz, Disk: 2 x 250GB Western Digital WD2502ABYS-1 + 1000GB Expansion + 500GB HDP725050GLA360, Graphics: AMD ES1000, Network: Broadcom Limited NetXtreme BCM5721 Gigabit PCI OS: Ubuntu 16.10, Kernel: 4.8.0-27-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 6.2.0 20161005, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 AIO-Stress 0.21 Test: Random Write MB/s > Higher Is Better HUKR200 . 181.02 |============================================================= FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better HUKR200 . 20.07 |============================================================== FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads Files/s > Higher Is Better HUKR200 . 43.90 |============================================================== FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better HUKR200 . 20.22 |============================================================== FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync Files/s > Higher Is Better HUKR200 . 783.40 |============================================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better HUKR200 . 6581.34 |============================================================ Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better HUKR200 . 3765.97 |============================================================ Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better HUKR200 . 4458.26 |============================================================ Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better HUKR200 . 4458.20 |============================================================ Loopback TCP Network Performance Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopback Seconds < Lower Is Better HUKR200 . 20.12 |============================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better HUKR200 . 599.57 |============================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better HUKR200 . 328.08 |============================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better HUKR200 . 76.47 |============================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better HUKR200 . 771.40 |============================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better HUKR200 . 1035.34 |============================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better HUKR200 . 786.58 |=============================================================