WOTAN

Running pts/openarena-1.5.3, pts/tesseract-1.1.0, pts/unigine-valley-1.1.4, pts/xonotic-1.4.0 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1610118-KH-1610112KH64
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
WOTAN
October 10 2016
 
WOTAN-
October 10 2016
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


WOTANProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionWOTANWOTAN-Intel Core i7-2670QM @ 3.10GHz (8 Cores)Dell 0RP6C8Intel 2nd Generation Core Family DRAM2 x 4096 MB DDR3-1333MHz Samsung1000GB Samsung SSD 850NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M 1024MB (594/896MHz)Realtek ALC269VBRealtek RTL8101/2/6E + Intel Centrino Wireless-N 1030Ubuntu 16.044.4.0-42-lowlatency (x86_64)Unity 7.4.0X Server 1.18.4NVIDIA 370.284.5.0GCC 5.4.0 20160609ext41920x10808192MBext4 (ecryptfs)OpenBenchmarking.orgProcessor Details- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave

WOTAN vs. WOTAN- ComparisonPhoronix Test SuiteBaseline+57.3%+57.3%+114.6%+114.6%+171.9%+171.9%+229.2%+229.2%1920 x 1080229.3%1920 x 1080 - Windowed19.9%1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen19.5%1920 x 1080 - Ultimate17.4%1920 x 108013.1%OpenArenaUnigine ValleyUnigine ValleyXonoticTesseractWOTANWOTAN-

WOTANopenarena: 1920 x 1080tesseract: 1920 x 1080unigine-valley: 1920 x 1080 - Windowedunigine-valley: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreenxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultimategputest: Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Windowedgputest: Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - FullscreenWOTANWOTAN-82.3344.406.516.6337.2010867131762539.245.435.5531.70OpenBenchmarking.org

OpenArena

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080WOTANWOTAN-20406080100SE +/- 26.61, N = 6SE +/- 0.00, N = 382.3325.00MIN: 2
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080WOTANWOTAN-1632486480Min: 55.7 / Avg: 82.33 / Max: 215.4Min: 25 / Avg: 25 / Max: 25

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame TimeWOTANWOTAN-714212835Min: 11 / Avg: 17.94 / Max: 31Min: 12 / Avg: 19.81 / Max: 29

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080WOTANWOTAN-1020304050SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 344.4039.24
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080WOTANWOTAN-918273645Min: 44.22 / Avg: 44.4 / Max: 44.49Min: 39.06 / Avg: 39.24 / Max: 39.58

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL GL3 Core Profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: WindowedWOTANWOTAN-246810SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 66.515.43
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: WindowedWOTANWOTAN-3691215Min: 6.51 / Avg: 6.51 / Max: 6.51Min: 5.1 / Avg: 5.43 / Max: 5.61

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWOTANWOTAN-246810SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 66.635.55
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWOTANWOTAN-3691215Min: 6.62 / Avg: 6.63 / Max: 6.63Min: 5.13 / Avg: 5.55 / Max: 5.65

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateWOTANWOTAN-918273645SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 337.2031.70MIN: 17 / MAX: 64MIN: 15 / MAX: 54
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateWOTANWOTAN-816243240Min: 37.2 / Avg: 37.2 / Max: 37.2Min: 31.59 / Avg: 31.7 / Max: 31.84

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: WindowedWOTAN2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 114.52, N = 310867

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWOTAN3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 4.16, N = 313176