Note_Inspiron_3420_Ubuntu
Intel Core i3-3110M testing with a Dell 04XGDT and Intel HD 4000 on Ubuntu 16.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Western Digital WD2500BEVT-2: 

	Processor: Intel Core i3-3110M @ 2.40GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Dell 04XGDT, Chipset: Intel 3rd Gen Core DRAM, Memory: 4096MB, Disk: 250GB Western Digital WD2500BEVT-2, Graphics: Intel HD 4000 (1000MHz), Audio: Cirrus Logic CS4213, Network: Realtek RTL8101/2/6E + Qualcomm Atheros AR9485 Wireless

	OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.4.0-31-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: intel 2.99.917, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1366x768

bench1: 

	Processor: Intel Core i3-3110M @ 2.40GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Dell 04XGDT, Chipset: Intel 3rd Gen Core DRAM, Memory: 4096MB, Disk: 250GB Western Digital WD2500BEVT-2, Graphics: Intel HD 4000 (1000MHz), Audio: Cirrus Logic CS4213, Network: Realtek RTL8101/2/6E + Qualcomm Atheros AR9485 Wireless

	OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.4.0-38-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: intel 2.99.917, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 11.2.0, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1366x768


FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
Western Digital WD2500BEVT-2 . 13.37 |=========================================
bench1 ....................... 13.15 |========================================


FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads
Files/s > Higher Is Better
Western Digital WD2500BEVT-2 . 20.20 |==================================
bench1 ....................... 24.27 |=========================================


FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
Western Digital WD2500BEVT-2 . 11.08 |===============================
bench1 ....................... 14.43 |=========================================


FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync
Files/s > Higher Is Better
Western Digital WD2500BEVT-2 . 46.72 |===================================
bench1 ....................... 54.73 |=========================================


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Copy
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Western Digital WD2500BEVT-2 . 6838.01 |===================================
bench1 ....................... 7558.80 |=======================================


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Scale
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Western Digital WD2500BEVT-2 . 6793.60 |===================================
bench1 ....................... 7517.47 |=======================================


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Triad
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Western Digital WD2500BEVT-2 . 7706.30 |===================================
bench1 ....................... 8522.55 |=======================================


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Add
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Western Digital WD2500BEVT-2 . 7502.65 |==================================
bench1 ....................... 8519.28 |=======================================


Loopback TCP Network Performance
Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopback
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Western Digital WD2500BEVT-2 . 20.74 |=========================================
bench1 ....................... 15.96 |================================


C-Ray 1.1
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Western Digital WD2500BEVT-2 . 96.11 |=========================================
bench1 ....................... 88.52 |======================================