bork IO scheduler testing
HDD vs SD-card comparison using different elevators


SD-noop: 

	Processor: Unknown @ 1.50GHz (4 Cores), Memory: 2048MB, Disk: 60GB A + 16GB NCard + 32GB 00000

	OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 3.14.65-61 (aarch64), Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609 + LLVM 3.8.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x1440

SD-cfq: 

	Processor: Unknown @ 1.50GHz (4 Cores), Memory: 2048MB, Disk: 60GB A + 16GB NCard + 32GB 00000

	OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 3.14.65-61 (aarch64), Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609 + LLVM 3.8.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x1440

HDD-cfq: 

	Processor: Unknown @ 1.50GHz (4 Cores), Memory: 2048MB, Disk: 60GB A + 16GB NCard + 32GB 00000

	OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 3.14.65-61 (aarch64), Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609 + LLVM 3.8.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x1440

HDD-deadline: 

	Processor: Unknown @ 1.50GHz (4 Cores), Memory: 2048MB, Disk: 60GB A + 16GB NCard + 32GB 00000

	OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 3.14.65-61 (aarch64), Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609 + LLVM 3.8.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x1440

SD-deadline: 

	Processor: Unknown @ 1.50GHz (4 Cores), Memory: 2048MB, Disk: 60GB A + 16GB NCard + 32GB 00000

	OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 3.14.65-61 (aarch64), Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609 + LLVM 3.8.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x1440


Bork File Encrypter 1.4
File Encryption Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
SD-noop ...... 259.92 |==================================================
SD-cfq ....... 230.96 |=============================================
HDD-cfq ...... 289.11 |========================================================
HDD-deadline . 187.52 |====================================
SD-deadline .. 256.27 |==================================================