jxrendermark-nouveau-2 Intel Core i7-5820K with eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6144MB on Ubuntu 16.04 jxrendermark-nouveau-2: Processor: Intel Pentium P6100 @ 2.00GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: LENOVO, Chipset: Intel Core DRAM, Memory: 3072MB, Disk: 500GB Western Digital WD5000BEVT-2, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce 310M 512MB (405/405MHz), Audio: Intel 5 /3400, Network: Realtek RTL8101E/RTL8102E + Broadcom BCM4313 802.11bgn Wireless OS: Debian 8.5, Kernel: 3.16.0-4-amd64 (x86_64), Desktop: LXDE 0.7.2, Display Server: X Server 1.16.4, Display Driver: nouveau 1.0.11, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 10.3.2 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.9.2, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1366x768 Compare results jxrendermark: Processor: Intel Pentium P6100 @ 2.00GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: LENOVO, Chipset: Intel Core DRAM, Memory: 3072MB, Disk: 500GB Western Digital WD5000BEVT-2, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce 310M 512MB (405/405MHz), Audio: Intel 5 /3400, Network: Realtek RTL8101E/RTL8102E + Broadcom BCM4313 802.11bgn Wireless OS: Debian 8.5, Kernel: 3.16.0-4-amd64 (x86_64), Desktop: LXDE 0.7.2, Display Server: X Server 1.16.4, Display Driver: nouveau 1.0.11, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 10.3.2 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.9.2, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1366x768 jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42: Processor: Intel Core i7-5820K @ 4.60GHz (12 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS X99-DELUXE II, Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 129024MB, Disk: 7 x 6001GB HGST HDN726060AL + 4001GB Seagate ST4000DX001-1CE1 + 3001GB TOSHIBA DT01ACA3 + 3 x 410GB Toshiba MKNSSDE3480GB + 256GB PLEXTOR PX-256M6 + 480GB Toshiba MKNSSDE3480GB + 512GB Samsung SSD 840 + 4001GB Western Digital WD4001FAEX-0, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6144MB (1189/3505MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Network: Intel Connection + Broadcom BCM4360 802.11ac Wireless OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.4.0-31-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Xfce 4.12, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 361.42, OpenGL: 4.5.0, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: btrfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 151068.03 |=========== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 153275.31 |=========== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 372996.11 |========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 31363.34 |======= Compare results jxrendermark ............ 31035.69 |======= jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 113002.20 |========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 37372.65 |=== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 38046.90 |=== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 336944.88 |========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 256x256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 10555.16 |= Compare results jxrendermark ............ 10623.82 |= jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 274533.40 |========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 512x512 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 2792.26 | Compare results jxrendermark ............ 2789.32 | jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 171272.86 |========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 20886.39 |========= Compare results jxrendermark ............ 21729.75 |========= jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 66010.53 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 256x256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 13513.88 |====== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 14112.17 |====== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 63883.12 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 512x512 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 7581.11 |=== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 7928.06 |==== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 59349.66 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 58914.13 |========= Compare results jxrendermark ............ 60318.60 |========== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 163790.56 |========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 1024x1024 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 1904.56 |= Compare results jxrendermark ............ 2016.90 |= jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 77911.82 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 1024x1024 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 4091.51 |=== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 4175.88 |=== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 35716.15 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 24675.49 |======= Compare results jxrendermark ............ 24343.33 |======= jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 96184.07 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 256x256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 9430.60 |======= Compare results jxrendermark ............ 9698.11 |======== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 34252.35 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 512x512 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 3989.34 |=== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 3966.49 |=== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 33615.46 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 51715.66 |======== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 52075.67 |======== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 165996.91 |========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 51580.14 |============ Compare results jxrendermark ............ 50902.14 |============ jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 114813.04 |========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 1024x1024 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 2041.72 |== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 1934.21 |== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 30027.25 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 25939.25 |===== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 26409.41 |===== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 148030.52 |========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 256x256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 10352.32 |== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 10490.78 |== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 113939.75 |========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 512x512 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 3734.91 |= Compare results jxrendermark ............ 3749.23 |= jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 87303.82 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 32945.51 |============= Compare results jxrendermark ............ 33010.68 |============= jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 66195.97 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 256x256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 19111.16 |======== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 19808.09 |======== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 65491.27 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 512x512 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 10830.67 |===== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 10648.18 |===== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 59479.59 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 17525.05 |======= Compare results jxrendermark ............ 17619.71 |======= jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 64791.81 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 10254.44 |=== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 10275.53 |=== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 84379.92 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 12609.66 |==== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 12642.06 |==== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 82631.70 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 1024x1024 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 1843.19 |= Compare results jxrendermark ............ 1860.88 |= jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 69043.20 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 1024x1024 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 5485.90 |==== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 5797.42 |==== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 35972.75 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 1953.14 |= Compare results jxrendermark ............ 1997.66 |= jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 58921.93 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 256x256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 496.94 | Compare results jxrendermark ............ 519.57 | jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 50018.14 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 512x512 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 133.35 | Compare results jxrendermark ............ 132.47 | jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 37489.46 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 1365.21 | Compare results jxrendermark ............ 1470.44 |= jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 76700.35 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 256x256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 334.44 | Compare results jxrendermark ............ 345.31 | jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 64033.43 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 512x512 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 186.50 | Compare results jxrendermark ............ 186.73 | jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 50080.52 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 2211.20 |= Compare results jxrendermark ............ 2570.70 |= jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 74812.75 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 256x256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 623.89 | Compare results jxrendermark ............ 615.06 | jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 61999.62 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 512x512 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 290.52 | Compare results jxrendermark ............ 290.26 | jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 48972.08 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 91625.39 |====== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 91073.60 |====== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 375668.37 |========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 1024x1024 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 126.81 | Compare results jxrendermark ............ 132.80 | jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 21405.25 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 1024x1024 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 114.22 | Compare results jxrendermark ............ 112.71 | jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 25208.76 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 1024x1024 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 154.25 | Compare results jxrendermark ............ 153.73 | jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 24534.02 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 51008.72 |======== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 51390.03 |======== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 166261.90 |========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 30610.13 |== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 30553.24 |== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 333364.34 |========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 256x256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 9531.28 |= Compare results jxrendermark ............ 9671.84 |= jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 270014.53 |========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 512x512 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 3399.54 |= Compare results jxrendermark ............ 2749.77 | jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 166832.00 |========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 52788.15 |======== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 52355.90 |======== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 171524.17 |========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 23857.64 |==== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 23932.48 |==== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 148818.19 |========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 256x256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 8739.58 |== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 8672.55 |== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 139750.64 |========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 512x512 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 2593.24 |= Compare results jxrendermark ............ 2690.16 |= jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 102647.92 |========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 1024x1024 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 2066.24 |= Compare results jxrendermark ............ 2096.12 |= jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 77288.59 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 25422.96 |===== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 26681.13 |===== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 145583.13 |========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 256x256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 9647.42 |== Compare results jxrendermark ............ 9660.58 |== jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 112647.73 |========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 512x512 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 3880.66 |= Compare results jxrendermark ............ 3890.56 |= jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 91778.34 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 1024x1024 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 1644.81 |= Compare results jxrendermark ............ 1710.03 |= jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 76106.85 |=========================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 1024x1024 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better jxrendermark-nouveau-2 .................. 2014.97 |= Compare results jxrendermark ............ 2050.55 |= jxrendermark-nouveau-2_vs_nvidia_361.42 . 69054.54 |===========================