GeForce GTX 970 Stressingh Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 testing with a MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0 and Device 8187MB on Ubuntu 16.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1606143-HA-GEFORCEGT54 GeForce GTX 1070 Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 950 PRO 256GB, Graphics: Device 8187MB (27/4006MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.4.0-22-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Driver: NVIDIA 367.18, OpenGL: 4.5.0, Vulkan: 1.0.8, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413 + CUDA 8.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-browser-plugin --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-gtk-cairo --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-java-home --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,java,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-arch-directory=amd64 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-tune=generic -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveOpenCL Notes: GPU Compute Cores: 1920System Notes: GPU Compute Cores: 1920.
GeForce GTX 970 Stressingh OpenBenchmarking.org Phoronix Test Suite Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores) MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0 Intel Sky Lake 16384MB Samsung SSD 950 PRO 256GB Device 8187MB (27/4006MHz) Realtek ALC1150 Intel Connection Ubuntu 16.04 4.4.0-22-generic (x86_64) Unity 7.4.0 NVIDIA 367.18 4.5.0 1.0.8 GCC 5.3.1 20160413 + CUDA 8.0 ext4 3840x2160 Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Driver OpenGL Vulkan Compiler File-System Screen Resolution GeForce GTX 970 Stressingh Benchmarks System Logs - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-browser-plugin --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-gtk-cairo --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-java-home --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,java,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-arch-directory=amd64 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-tune=generic -v - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave - GPU Compute Cores: 1920 - GPU Compute Cores: 1920.
GeForce GTX 970 Stressingh dota2: 3840 x 2160 - OpenGL dota2: 3840 x 2160 - Vulkan f12015: 2560 x 1440 - Ultra Quality portal: 3840 x 2160 financebench: Black-Scholes OpenCL financebench: Monte-Carlo OpenCL mixbench: Single Precision mixbench: Double Precision mixbench: Integer luxmark: GPU - Luxball HDR luxmark: GPU - Microphone luxmark: GPU - Hotel caffe: CUDA cuda-mini-nbody: Original cuda-mini-nbody: SOA Data Layout cuda-mini-nbody: Flush Denormals To Zero cuda-mini-nbody: Cache Blocking cuda-mini-nbody: Loop Unrolling gputest: Furmark - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen gputest: TessMark - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen gputest: GiMark - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen gputest: Pixmark Piano - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen gputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen gputest: Triangle - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen gputest: Plot3D - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen tesseract: 3840 x 2160 xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Low xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - High xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultra xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultimate openarena: 1920 x 1080 unigine-valley: 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen unigine-heaven: 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen insurgency: 3840 x 2160 shoc: CUDA - Bus Speed Download shoc: CUDA - Bus Speed Readback shoc: CUDA - Max SP Flops shoc: CUDA - Texture Read Bandwidth shoc: CUDA - FFT SP shoc: CUDA - MD5 Hash shoc: CUDA - Triad shoc: OpenCL - Bus Speed Download shoc: OpenCL - Bus Speed Readback shoc: OpenCL - Max SP Flops shoc: OpenCL - Texture Read Bandwidth shoc: OpenCL - FFT SP shoc: OpenCL - MD5 Hash shoc: OpenCL - Triad GeForce GTX 1070 99.27 85 84.07 351.99 9.61 599.56 6597.43 225.27 2042.94 15805 7346 3027 11636.87 39.17 37.27 37.07 17.98 18.60 2810 13166 6200 558 1739 181186 85205 242.87 428.96 329.00 258.14 182.73 490.90 38.31 30.84 207.67 12.36 13.17 7081.79 504.47 375.21 8.45 14.66 12.38 13.18 7096.38 452.63 290.58 8.37 11.57 OpenBenchmarking.org
Dota 2 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Dota 2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Renderer: OpenGL GeForce GTX 1070 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 99.27
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 36.0 50.6 58.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Dota 2 GPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 74.8 164.9 198.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Dota 2 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Dota 2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Renderer: Vulkan GeForce GTX 1070 20 40 60 80 100 85
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 46.0 50.6 58.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Dota 2 GPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 41.0 121.0 198.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Dota 2 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
F1 2015 This is a benchmark of F1 2015 via Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you have rights to F1 2015. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better F1 2015 Test: 2560 x 1440 - Ultra Quality GeForce GTX 1070 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 2.97, N = 3 84.07 MIN: 60.97 / MAX: 105.31
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 45.0 60.4 67.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better F1 2015 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 82.3 179.5 210.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better F1 2015 System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Portal OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Portal Resolution: 3840 x 2160 GeForce GTX 1070 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 351.99
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 50.0 55.2 59.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Portal GPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 72.4 144.2 203.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Portal System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FinanceBench 2016-06-06 GPU Temperature Monitor GeForce GTX 1070 11 22 33 44 55 50.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FinanceBench 2016-06-06 System Power Consumption Monitor GeForce GTX 1070 14 28 42 56 70 63.4
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 43.0 44.8 46.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FinanceBench 2016-06-06 GPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 63.7 81.1 92.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FinanceBench 2016-06-06 System Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Mixbench 2016-06-06 GPU Temperature Monitor GeForce GTX 1070 9 18 27 36 45 41.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Mixbench 2016-06-06 System Power Consumption Monitor GeForce GTX 1070 20 40 60 80 100 103.6
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Mixbench 2016-06-06 GPU Temperature Monitor GeForce GTX 1070 9 18 27 36 45 41.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Mixbench 2016-06-06 System Power Consumption Monitor GeForce GTX 1070 9 18 27 36 45 40.3
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Mixbench 2016-06-06 GPU Temperature Monitor GeForce GTX 1070 10 20 30 40 50 42.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Mixbench 2016-06-06 System Power Consumption Monitor GeForce GTX 1070 11 22 33 44 55 48.7
LuxMark LuxMark is a multi-platform OpenGL benchmark using LuxRender / SLG2. LuxMark supports targeting different OpenCL devices and has multiple scenes available for rendering. LuxMark is a fully open-source OpenCL program with real-world rendering examples. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better LuxMark 3.0 OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR GeForce GTX 1070 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 86.50, N = 3 15805
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 43.0 64.6 70.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LuxMark 3.0 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 40.1 166.9 175.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LuxMark 3.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 55.0 63.6 66.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LuxMark 3.0 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 58.9 149.1 155.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LuxMark 3.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 52.0 69.5 73.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LuxMark 3.0 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 49.6 180.5 186.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LuxMark 3.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Caffe AlexNet OpenBenchmarking.org Milli-Seconds, Fewer Is Better Caffe AlexNet 2016-06-11 Build: CUDA GeForce GTX 1070 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 10.24, N = 3 11636.87 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fPIC -O2 -lcaffe -lglog -lgflags -lprotobuf -lboost_system -lboost_filesystem -lm -lhdf5_hl -lhdf5 -lleveldb -lsnappy -llmdb -lopencv_core -lopencv_highgui -lopencv_imgproc -lboost_thread -lstdc++ -lcblas -latlas
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 63.0 65.3 67.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Caffe AlexNet 2016-06-11 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 42.3 126.4 177.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Caffe AlexNet 2016-06-11 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 54.0 68.0 73.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 82.5 178.5 198.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 63.0 69.6 73.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 41.9 171.5 191.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 57.0 68.5 74.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 66.0 171.8 191.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 57.0 65.2 70.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 42.3 163.9 188.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 59.0 64.1 69.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 41.9 130.9 189.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 54.0 63.7 68.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 40.9 182.0 205.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen GeForce GTX 1070 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 43.33, N = 3 13166
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 49.0 62.8 69.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 41.0 159.7 195.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen GeForce GTX 1070 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 14.11, N = 3 6200
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 45.0 63.2 66.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 40.3 187.9 198.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen GeForce GTX 1070 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 2.52, N = 3 558
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 52.0 69.6 74.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 81.3 182.8 194.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen GeForce GTX 1070 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 4.91, N = 3 1739
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 56.0 71.1 75.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 42.4 176.3 193.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen GeForce GTX 1070 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 520.27, N = 3 181186
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 55.0 56.5 58.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 GPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 65.4 125.5 131.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen GeForce GTX 1070 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 111.22, N = 3 85205
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 48.0 59.6 63.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 41.0 148.5 157.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 54.0 61.2 64.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 42.0 157.8 189.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 48.0 51.4 54.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8 GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 40.7 109.7 131.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8 System Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High GeForce GTX 1070 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.51, N = 3 329.00 MIN: 218 / MAX: 455
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 46.0 53.5 57.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8 GPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 69.7 156.8 197.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra GeForce GTX 1070 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 258.14 MIN: 149 / MAX: 368
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 46.0 57.7 64.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 40.6 164.9 195.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate GeForce GTX 1070 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 182.73 MIN: 59 / MAX: 300
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 50.0 63.1 70.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 85.3 171.3 194.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame Time GeForce GTX 1070 3 6 9 12 15 Min: 1 / Avg: 1.82 / Max: 7
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 55.0 56.0 58.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 GPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 42.0 93.3 142.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 System Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Unigine Valley This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL GL3 Core Profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen GeForce GTX 1070 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 38.31
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 50.0 68.9 73.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 68.0 190.9 198.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 54.0 66.5 70.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 86.0 186.2 199.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Insurgency This is a benchmark of the Source Engine Insurgency game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that Insurgency is already installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Insurgency Resolution: 3840 x 2160 GeForce GTX 1070 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 207.67
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 51.0 57.5 61.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Insurgency GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 42.0 163.4 208.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Insurgency System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 GPU Temperature Monitor GeForce GTX 1070 11 22 33 44 55 49.00
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 41.2 67.9 94.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 System Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 GPU Temperature Monitor GeForce GTX 1070 11 22 33 44 55 47.00
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 49.9 66.6 83.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 System Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 51.0 59.9 65.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 79.6 128.7 169.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 51.0 58.2 61.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 42.5 139.3 147.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 System Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 GPU Temperature Monitor GeForce GTX 1070 12 24 36 48 60 52.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 System Power Consumption Monitor GeForce GTX 1070 9 18 27 36 45 41.6
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 GPU Temperature Monitor GeForce GTX 1070 11 22 33 44 55 47.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 System Power Consumption Monitor GeForce GTX 1070 9 18 27 36 45 41.2
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 44.0 44.5 45.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 GPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 40.9 56.7 72.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 System Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 42.0 43.0 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 GPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 System Power Consumption Monitor GeForce GTX 1070 20 40 60 80 100 93.4
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 GPU Temperature Monitor GeForce GTX 1070 10 20 30 40 50 43.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 System Power Consumption Monitor GeForce GTX 1070 20 40 60 80 100 92.0
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 47.0 59.9 64.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 41.4 125.7 189.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 52.0 53.4 54.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 41.0 102.4 131.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 System Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 GPU Temperature Monitor GeForce GTX 1070 11 22 33 44 55 48.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 System Power Consumption Monitor GeForce GTX 1070 9 18 27 36 45 41.1
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 GPU Temperature Monitor GeForce GTX 1070 10 20 30 40 50 45.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 System Power Consumption Monitor GeForce GTX 1070 9 18 27 36 45 40.7
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 GPU Temperature Monitor GeForce GTX 1070 10 20 30 40 50 43.00
Min Avg Max GeForce GTX 1070 40.4 62.9 85.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 System Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
GPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius GPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring GeForce GTX 1070 14 28 42 56 70 Min: 35 / Avg: 60.94 / Max: 75
System Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts System Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring GeForce GTX 1070 40 80 120 160 200 Min: 40.1 / Avg: 143.04 / Max: 210.4
GeForce GTX 1070 Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 950 PRO 256GB, Graphics: Device 8187MB (27/4006MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.4.0-22-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Driver: NVIDIA 367.18, OpenGL: 4.5.0, Vulkan: 1.0.8, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413 + CUDA 8.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-browser-plugin --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-gtk-cairo --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-java-home --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,java,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-arch-directory=amd64 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-tune=generic -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveOpenCL Notes: GPU Compute Cores: 1920System Notes: GPU Compute Cores: 1920.
Testing initiated at 13 June 2016 21:33 by user phoronix.